Advertisement

DNS of Compressible Inert and Infinitely Fast Reacting Mixing Layers

  • Inga Mahle
  • Jörn Sesterhenn
  • Rainer Friedrich
Conference paper
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (NNFM) book series (NNFM, volume 96)

Abstract

This paper deals with the effects of heat release and compressibility on temporally evolving, turbulent mixing layers. Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) of such layers at two different convective Mach numbers are performed with and without combustion which allows to study the effects of heat release and compressibility separately and combined. It is shown that both, compressibility and heat release, dampen the turbulence activity and lead to a reduced growth of the mixing layer. Alterations in pressure fluctuations are a main reason for the changes. The effects of compressibility are not as strong in the reacting mixing layer as in the inert one. A significant difference between the inert and the reacting mixing layers at high convective Mach number is that entropic density fluctuations prevail over the acoustic ones when reaction takes place while both contribute to nearly equal parts in the non-reacting compressible flow.

Keywords

Heat Release Direct Numerical Simulation Mixture Fraction Reynolds Shear Stress Momentum Thickness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A.W. Vreman, N.D. Sandham, K.H. Luo: ”Compressible mixing layer growth rate and turbulence characteristics”. J. Fluid Mech. 320, 1996, 235–258.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S.P. Burke, T.E.W. Schumann: ”Diffusion flames”. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 20, 1928, 998–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Pantano, S. Sarkar: ”A study of compressibility effects in the high-speed turbulent shear layer using direct simulation”. J. Fluid Mech. 451, 2002, 329–371.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Sesterhenn: ”A characteristic-type formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations for high order upwind schemes”. Computers & Fluids 30, 2000, 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Williamson: ”Low-storage Runge-Kutta schemes”, J. Comput. Phys. 35, 1980, 48–56.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S.K. Lele: ”Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution”, J. Comput. Phys. 103, 1992, 16–42.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Sarkar: ”The high-speed turbulent shear layer”. In: ”Variable Density Fluid Turbulence, Fluid Mechanics and its Applications”, Eds: P. Chassaing, R.A. Antonia, F. Anselmet, L. Joly, S. Sarkar, Kluwer, 2002, 235–259.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inga Mahle
    • 1
  • Jörn Sesterhenn
    • 1
  • Rainer Friedrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachgebiet StrömungsmechanikTU MünchenGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations