Skip to main content

Hardness Results for Tournament Isomorphism and Automorphism

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2007 (MFCS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4708))

Abstract

A tournament is a graph in which each pair of distinct vertices is connected by exactly one directed edge. Tournaments are an important graph class, for which isomorphism testing seems to be easier to compute than for the isomorphism problem of general graphs. We show that tournament isomorphism and tournament automorphism is hard under DLOGTIME uniform AC0 many-one reductions for the complexity classes NL, C=L, PL (probabilistic logarithmic space), for logarithmic space modular counting classes Mod kL with odd k ≥ 3 and for DET, the class of problems, NC1 reducible to the determinant. These lower bounds have been proven for graph isomorphism, see [21].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arvind, V., Beigel, R., Lozano, A.: The Complexity of Modular Graph Automorphism. Symp. on Theoret. Aspects of Computer Sci., 172–182 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arvind, V., Das, B., Mukhopadhyay, P.: On Isomorphism and Canonization of Tournaments and Hypertournaments. In: Asano, T. (ed.) ISAAC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4288, pp. 449–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Allender, E., Ogihara, M.: Relationships among PL, and the determinant. RAIRO Inform. Theor. Appl. 30, 1–21 (1996)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvarez, C., Jenner, B.: A very hard logspace counting class. Theoretical Computer Science 107, 3–30 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrington, D.A.M., Immerman, N., Straubing, H.: On uniformity within NC1. J. Comput. System Sci. 41, 274–306 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Babai, L., Luks, E.: Canonical labeling of graphs. Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 171–183 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boppana, R., Hastad, J., Zachos, S.: Does co-NP have short interactive proofs? Inform. Process. Lett. 25, 27–32 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Buntrock, G., Damm, C., Hertrampf, U., Meinel, C.: Structure and importance of logspace-MOD-classes. Math. System Theory 25, 223–237 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Buss, S.R.: Alogtime algorithms for tree isomorphism, comparison, and canonization. In: Gottlob, G., Leitsch, A., Mundici, D. (eds.) KGC 1997. LNCS, vol. 1289, pp. 18–33. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cook, S.A.: A taxonomy of problems with fast parallel algorithms. Information and Control 64, 2–22 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill, J.: Computational complexity of probabilistic Turing machines. SIAM J. Comput. 6, 675–695 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Gross, J.L., Yellen, J.: Discrete Mathematics and its Applications - Handbook of Graph Theory. CRC Press LLC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hopcroft, J.E., Tarjan, R.E.: A V 2 algorithm for determining isomorphism of planar graphs, pp. 32–34 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Köbler, J., Schöning, U., Torán, J.: The Graph Isomorphism Problem - Its Structural Complexity. In: Prog. Theor. Comp.Sci., Birkhaeuser, Boston, MA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindell, S.: A logspace algorithm for tree canonization. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 400–404 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luks, E.: Isomorphism of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time. J. Comput. System Sci. 25, 42–65 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Luks, E.: Parallel algorithms for perumtation groups and graph isomorphism. In: Proc. of the 27th IEEE Symp. on Found. of Comp. Sci., pp. 292–302 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, G.L., Reif, J.H.: Parallel tree contraction Part 2: further applications. SIAM Journal on Computing 20(6), 1128–1147 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruzzo, W., Simon, J., Tompa, M.: Space bounded hierarchies and probabilistic computations. J. Comput. System Sci. 28, 216–230 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Schöning, U.: Graph isomorphism is in the low hierarchy. J. Comput. System Sci. 37, 312–323 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Torán, J.: On the Hardness of Graph Isomorphism. SIAM J. Comput. 33(5), 1093–1108 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Luděk Kučera Antonín Kučera

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wagner, F. (2007). Hardness Results for Tournament Isomorphism and Automorphism. In: Kučera, L., Kučera, A. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2007. MFCS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4708. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74456-6_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74456-6_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74455-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74456-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics