Skip to main content

Dilip Abreu on Hugo F. Sonnenschein

  • Chapter
Foundations in Microeconomic Theory
  • 2138 Accesses

Abstract

I came to Princeton in Fall 1980 to begin, as it turned out, three of the most important years of my life. I am, professionally, what was coaxed into shape there. Hugo was a central element of this defining experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abreu, D., and H. Matsushima (1990): “Virtual Implementation in Iteratively Undominated Strategies: Incomplete Information,” mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Abreu, D., and H. Matsushima (1991): “Response to Glazer and Rosenthal,” forthcoming in Econometrica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abreu, D., and A. Sen (1990): “Subgame Perfect Implementation: A Necessary and Almost Sufficient Condition,” Journal of Economic Theory, 50, 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -Aupbreu, D., and A. Sen (1991): “Virtual Implementation in Nash Equilibrium,” Econometrica, 59, 997–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D. (1984): “Rationalizable Strategic Behavior,” Econometrica, 52, 1007–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgers, T. (1991): “A Note on Implementation and Strong Dominance,” mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilov, V. (1992): “Implementation via Nash Equilibria,” Econometrica, 60, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M., and R. Farquharson (1961): “Stability in Voting,” Econometrica, 29, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquharson, R. (1957/1969): Theory of Voting. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. (1973): “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result,” Econometrica, 41, 587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -Gibbard, A. (1977):“Manipulation of Schemes that Mix Voting with Chance,” Econometrica, 45, 665–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Gibbard, A. (1978): “Straightforwardness of Game Forms with Lotteries as Outcomes,” Econometrica, 46, 595–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, J., and R. W. Rosenthal (1991): “A Note on Abreu-Matsushima Mechanisms,” forthcoming in Econometrica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O., and J. Moore (1988): “Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation,” Econometrica, 56, 755–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M., and S. Srivastava (1989): “Implementation via Backward Induction,” mimeo, Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L. (1972): “On Informationally Decentralized Systems,” in Decision and Organization, ed. by R. Radner and C. B. McGuire. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (1989): “Implementation in Undominated Strategies: A Look at Bounded Mechanisms,” forthcoming in Review of Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E. (1977): “Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality,” mimeo, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Maskin, E.(1985): “The Theory of Implementation in Nash Equilibrium,” in Social Goal and Social Organization, ed. by L. Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler, and H. Sonnenschein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E., and J. Moore (1986): “Implementation and Renegotiation,” mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsushima, H. (1988): “A New Approach to the Implementation Problem,” Journal of Economic Theory, 45, 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1991): “Implementation, Contracts and Renegotiation in Environments with Complete Information,” to appear in Advances in Economic Theory: Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of the Econometric Society, ed. by J.-J. Laffont. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J., and R. Repuixo (1988): “Subgame Perfect Implementation,” Econometrica, 56, 1191–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1979): “Dominance Solvable Voting Scheme,” Econometrica, 47, 1337–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -Moulin, H. (1980): “Implementing Efficient, Anonymous and Neutral Social Choice Functions,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 7, 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Moulin, H. (1981): “Implementing Just and Efficient Decision-Making,” Journal of Public Economics, 16, 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Moulin, H. (1983): The Strategy of Social Choice. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, T., and S. Srivastava (1991): “Nash Implementation Using Undominated Strategies,” Econometrica, 59, 479–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P. K. (1973): “On the Stability of Sincere Voting Situations,” Journal of Economic Theory, 6, 558–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (1984): “Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection,” Econometrica, 52, 1029–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postlewaite, A., and D. Wettstein (1989): “Feasible and Continuous Implementation,” Review of Economic Studies, 56, 603–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, M. (1975): “Strategy-Proofness and Arrow’s Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Choice Functions,” Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1960): “Utility, Strategy and Social Decision Rules,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 507–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser, R. (1969): “Majority Rule with Lotteries on Alternatives,” Review of Economic Studies, 42, 696–703.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abreu, D., Matsushima, H. (2008). Dilip Abreu on Hugo F. Sonnenschein. In: Jackson, M.O., McLennan, A. (eds) Foundations in Microeconomic Theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74057-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics