Skip to main content

Biological Inspiration for Artificial Immune Systems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Artificial Immune Systems (ICARIS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4628))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Artificial immune systems (AISs) to date have generally been inspired by naive biological metaphors. This has limited the effectiveness of these systems. In this position paper two ways in which AISs could be made more biologically realistic are discussed. We propose that AISs should draw their inspiration from organisms which possess only innate immune systems, and that AISs should employ systemic models of the immune system to structure their overall design. An outline of plant and invertebrate immune systems is presented, and a number of contemporary systemic models are reviewed. The implications for interdisciplinary research that more biologically-realistic AISs could have is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hart, E., Timmis, J.: Application Areas of AIS: The Past, The Present and The Future. In: Jacob, C., Pilat, M.L., Bentley, P.J., Timmis, J.I. (eds.) ICARIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3627, pp. 483–497. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Timmis, J.: Artificial immune systems - today and tomorrow. Natural Computing 6(1), 1–18 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Litman, G.W., Cannon, J.P., Dishaw, L.J.: Reconstructing immune phylogeny: new perspectives. Nature Reviews in Immunology 5, 866–879 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Immune Systems. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg (2002-2006), http://www.artificial-immune-systems.org/

  5. Germain, R.N.: An innately interesting decade of research in immunology. Nature Medicine 10(12), 1307–1320 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones, J.D.G., Dangl, J.L.: The Plant Immune System. Nature 444, 323–329 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dangl, J.L., Jones, J.D.G.: Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411, 826–833 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kessler, A., Baldwin, I.T.: Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 53, 299–328 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boehm, T.: Quality Control in Self/Nonself Discrimination. Cell 125(5), 845–858 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nasrallah, J.B.: Recognition and Rejection of Self in Plant Reproduction. Science 296, 305–308 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loker, E.S., Adema, C.M., Zhang, S.M., Kepler, T.B.: Invertebrate immune systems - not homogeneous, not simple, not well understood. Immunological Reviews 198, 10–24 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtz, J., Armitage, S.A.: Alternative adaptive immunity in invertebrates. Trends in Immunology 27(11), 493–496 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dong, Y., Taylor, H.E., Dimopoulos, G.: AgDscam, a Hypervariable Immunoglobulin Domain-Containing Receptor of the Anopheles gambiae Innate Immune System. PLoS Biology 4(7), 1137–1146 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, S.-M., Adema, C.M., Kepler, T.B., Loker, E.S.: Diversification of Ig Superfamily Genes in an Invertebrate. Science 305(5681), 251–254 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurtz, J.: Specific memory within innate immune systems. Trends in Immunology 26(4), 186–192 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Litman, G.F., Anderson, M.K., Rast, J.: Evolution of antigen binding receptors. Annual Review of Immunology 17, 109–147 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pancer, Z., Saha, N.R., Kasamatsu, J., Suzuki, T., Amemiya, C.T., Kasahara, M., Cooper, M.D.: Variable lymphocyte receptors in hagfish. PNAS 102(26), 9224–9229 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alder, M.N., Rogozin, I.B., Iyer, L.M., Glazko, G.V., Cooper, M.D., Pancer, Z.: Diversity and function of adaptive immune receptors in a jawless vertebrate. Science 310(5756), 1970–1973 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Twycross, J., Aickelin, U.: Towards a Conceptual Framework for Innate Immunity. In: Jacob, C., Pilat, M.L., Bentley, P.J., Timmis, J.I. (eds.) ICARIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3627, pp. 112–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Twycross, J.: Integrated Innate and Adaptive Artificial Immune Systems applied to Process Anomaly Detection. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Langman, R.E., Cohn, M.: A short history of time and space in immune discrimination. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 44(3), 544–548 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Matzinger, P.: Essay 1: the Danger model in its historical context. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 54(1-2), 4–9 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. HMS Beagle: The Great Debate: The web debate on self-nonself. Salk Institute (1997), http://cig.salk.edu/bicd_140_W99/debate/debate.htm

  24. Sakaguchi, S.: Regulatory T cells: Meden Agan. Immunological Reviews 212(1), 5–7 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pradeu, T., Carosella, E.D.: The Self Model and the Conception of Biological Identity in Immunology. Biology and Philosophy 21(2), 235–252 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Burnet, F.M.: The Clonal Selection Theory of Acquired Immunity. Vanderbilt University Press (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bretscher, P., Cohn, M.: A Theory of Self-Nonself Discrimination. Science 169, 1042–1049 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tauber, A.I.: The elusive immune self: a case of category errors. Perspectives in biology and medicine 42(4), 459–474 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Janeway, C.A.: Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology LIV, 1–13 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Medzhitov, R., Janeway, C.A.: Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system. Science 296, 298–300 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Matzinger, P.: Tolerance, Danger, and the Extended Family. Annual Review of Immunology 12, 991–1045 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Matzinger, P.: Friendly and dangerous signals: is the tissue in control?. Nature Immunology 8(1), 11–13 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson, C., Matzinger, P.: Anderson and Matzinger: Round 3. Seminars in Immunology 12, 331–341 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Canguilhem, G.: The Normal and the Pathological. Zone Books (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Haraway, D.: The Biopolitics of Postmodern Bodies: Constitutions of Self in Immune System Discourse. In: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 203–230. Free Association Books (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen, I.R.: The cognitive principle challenges clonal selection. Immunology Today 13(11), 441–444 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cohen, I.R.: Tending Adam’s Garden: Evolving the Cognitive Immune Self. Academic Press, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Andrews, P.S., Timmis, J.: Inspiration for the Next Generation of Artificial Immune Systems. In: Jacob, C., Pilat, M.L., Bentley, P.J., Timmis, J.I. (eds.) ICARIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3627, pp. 126–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cunliffe, J.: Morphostasis and immunity. Medical Hypotheses 44(2), 89–96 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cunliffe, J.: Tissue Homeostasis and Immunity - More on Models. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 64(3), 172–176 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dembic, Z.: Do we need integrity? Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 44(3), 549–550 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dembic, Z.: Immune system protects integrity of tissues. Molecular immunology 37(10), 563–569 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Leandro Nunes de Castro Fernando José Von Zuben Helder Knidel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Twycross, J., Aickelin, U. (2007). Biological Inspiration for Artificial Immune Systems. In: de Castro, L.N., Von Zuben, F.J., Knidel, H. (eds) Artificial Immune Systems. ICARIS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4628. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73922-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73922-7_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73921-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73922-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics