Abstract
The deficiencies of any kind of central planning are exposed by comparison with the paradigm of complex, evolutionary systems. Ideologically, market-democracies borrow that paradigm, subject to the distortions imposed by economic and political concentrations of power that seek control of resources. Economic space-time (geography) is a resource very much subject to such would-be concentrations of control by “top-down” forms of planning. In the U.S. particularly, the dichotomization of “land use” and “transport” planning and the ongoing contention about how such planning should be allocated and supported by models, illustrates the divergence between the ideological theory and contention for control. This paper traces some history of that contention and offers the scale hierarchy as a prescriptive framework that respects both the evolved governance hierarchy and the distributed preferences and uncertainties such governance must accommodate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Prigogine, Ilya, 1980, From Being to Becoming—Time and Complexity, W.H. Freeman, NY.
Weiner, Edward, 1992, Urban Transportation Planning in the United States, USDOT, Washington, DC.
Salthe, S.N., 1985, Evolving Hierarchical Systems, Columbia University Press, NY; Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology, MIT Press, 1994. There are several later papers either individually or joint by Nelson and Salthe that further elaborate the scale hierarchy concept.
Hayek, 1978, Law Liberty and Legislation, University of Chicago Press.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2000, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC.
Mowbray, A.Q., 1969, Road to Ruin, Lippincott, NY.
FHWA, 2002, TRANSIMS information at http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/transims/
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., and Cambridge Systematics, Inc., 1997, Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual, http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/mvrcm/
Allen, P.M. et. al, The Dynamics of Urban Evolution, Volume 1: Inter-Urban Evolution and Volume 2: Intra-Urban Evolution, Final Report, October 1978. USDOT-RSPA, Cambridge, MA.
_____, 1981, Urban Evolution, Self-Organisation and Decision Making, Environment and Planning A, pp 167–183.
Allen, P.M., 1997, Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Models of Complexity, Gordon and Breach, Environmental Problems and Social Dynamics Series.
BPR (Bureau of Public Roads), 1939, Toll Roads and Free Roads, Report to Congress, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 NECSI Cambridge, Massachusetts
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nelson, G.G., Allen, P.M. (2008). Self-Organizing Geography. In: Minai, A.A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IV. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73849-7_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73849-7_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73848-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73849-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)