Abstract
In a traditional choreography a choreographer determines the motions of a dancer or a group of dancers. Information theory shows that there is a limit to the complexity that can be created in any given amount of time. This is true even when building on previous work, since movements and their interactions have to be communicated to the dancers. When creating a group work, choreographers circumvent this problem by focusing either on the movements of individual dancers (giving rise to intricate movements but within a simple spatiotemporal organization) or on the overall structure (intricate patterns but simple movements) or by creating room for the dancers to fill in part of the movements. Complexity theory offers a different paradigm towards the generation of enticing patterns. Flocks of birds or schools of fish for instance are considered ‘beautiful’ but lack a central governing agent. Computer simulations show that a few simple rules can give rise to the emergence of the kind of patterns seen in flocks or swarms. In these models individual agents are represented by dots or equivalent shapes. To be of use to choreography and to be implemented on or rather with dancers, some additional rules will therefore have to be introduced. A number of possible rules are presented, which were extracted from ‘real life’ experiments with dancers. The current framework for modeling flocking behavior, based on local interactions between single agents, will be extended to include more general forms of interaction. Dancers may for instance perceive the global structure they form, e.g. a line or a cluster, and then put that knowledge to creative use according to some pre-established rules, e.g. if there is a line, form a circle or if there is a cluster spread out in all directions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Adami, C., & Cerf, N.J. 2000, Physical complexity of symbolic sequences. Physica D 137, 62–69.
Birkhoff, G.D., 1956, Mathematics of Aesthetics, in The World of Mathematics Vol. 4 edited by J.R. Newman, Simon and Schuster (New York), 2185–2195.
Birkhoff, G.D., 1933, Aesthetic Measure, Harvard University Press (Cambridge, MA).
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G., 2000, Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour, Nature 406, 39–42.
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G., 1999, Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems, Oxford University Press (Oxford).
Csahók, Z., & Vicsek, T., 1995, Lattice gas model for collective biological motion, Physical Review E 52, 5297.
Cszikszentmihalyi, M., 1992, Flow. The Psychology of Happines, Rider (London).
Czirok, A., Stanley, H.E., & Vicsek, T., 1997, Spontaneously ordered motion of self-propelled particles, Journal of Physics A 30, 1375.
Gell-Mann, M., 1994, The Quark and the Jaguar. Adventures in the Simple and Complex, Abacus (London).
Helbing, D., & Molnár, P., 1995, Social force model for pedestrian dynamics, Physical Review E 51, 4282–4286.
Helbing, D., 2001, Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 73, 1067–1141.
Helbing, D., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T., 2000, Simulating dynamical features of escape panic, Nature 407, 487–490.
Holland, J.H., 1995, Hidden Order. How adaptation builds complexity, Helix Books (Reading, MA).
Holland, J.H., 1998, Emergence. From chaos to order, Perseus Books (Reading, MA).
Koshelev, M., 1998, Towards The Use of Aesthetics in Decision Making: Kolmogorov Complexity Formalizes Birkhoff’s Idea, Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science, 66, 166–170.
Kreinovich, V., Longpre, L., & Koshelev, M., 1998, Kolmogorov complexity, statistical regularization of inverse problems, and Birkhoff’s formalization of beauty, in Bayesian Inference for Inverse Problems, Proceedings of the SPIE/International Society for Optical Engineering edited by A. Mohamad-Djafari, 3459, 159–170.
Li, M., & Vitanyi, P.M.B., 1997, An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications 2nd edition, Springer (New York).
Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., & Barabasi, A.-L., 2000, The sound of many hands clapping, Nature 403, 849–850.
Ramachandran, V.S., & Hirstein, W., 1999, The science of art. A neurological theory of aesthetic experience, Journal of Consciousness Studies 6,6–7, 15–51.
Reynolds, C.W., 1987, Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model, Computer Graphics 21,4, 25–34.
Rietstap, I. 2002, Danstaal Forsythe te complex voor publiek [transl.: Dance language Forsythe too complex for audience], NRC Handelsblad, 15 April.
Toner, J., & Tu, Y., 1998 Flocks, herds and schools: a quantitative theory of flocking, Physical Review E 58, 4828–4858.
Wolpert, D.H., & Turner, K., 1999, An introduction to collective intelligence, in Handbook of Agent Technology edited by J.M. Bradshaw, AAAI Press/MIT Press (Cambridge, MA).
Zeki, S., 1999, Inner vision. An exploration of art and the brain, Oxford University Press (Oxford).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 NECSI Cambridge, Massachusetts
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hagendoorn, I. (2008). Emergent Patterns in Dance Improvisation and Choreography. In: Minai, A.A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IV. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73849-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73849-7_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73848-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73849-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)