Abstract
Numerous attempts have been made to improve image reconstruction algorithms in EIT. In contrast, the magnitude of measurement errors of an EIT system was not an exploratory focus in the past. Especially in absolute EIT (a-EIT) where the resistivity of the examined object is determined on an absolute scale the influence of these errors can not be ignored since systematic errors are not cancelled by dividing the raw data by reference data (cf. Sheffield back projection). We present very simple phantoms and provocative adapters for a 16 electrode system using adjacent drive pattern to determine the measurement errors. The trans-impedance of each phantom is determined by only one component and output voltage is constant for all combinations of current injection and measurement. Therefore the electrical properties of the phantoms can be determined fast and precisely. Input and output impedance can be chosen independently of output voltage similar to that of the human thorax. Parameters like the absolute error of each driving/sensing channel, signal to noise ratio in each channel and especially the several kinds of crosstalk can be determined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hahn G, Frerichs I, Beer M, Schröder T, Hellige G (1999) Evaluation of the performance of electrical impedance tomography systems. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:122-123
Hahn G, Beer M, Frerichs I, Dudykevych T, Schröder T, Hellige G (2000) A simple method to check the dynamic performance of electrical impedance tomography systems. Physiological Measurement 21:53-60
Hahn G, Dudykevych T, Frerichs I, Thiel F, Hellige G (2002) A high performance electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system for clinical evaluation studies and space application. 2nd European Medical & Biological Engineering Conference EMBEC’02, Vienna, Dec 04 - 08. H Hutten and P Krösl (Graz: Verlag der TU Graz), 110-111
Griffiths H, Zhang Z (1989) A dual-frequency electrical impedance tomography system. Physics in medicine and biology 34:1465-1476
McEwan A, Romsauerova A, Yerworth R, Horesh L, Bayford R, Holder D (2006) Design and calibration of a compact multi-frequency EIT system for acute stroke imaging. Physiol Meas 27:S199-210
Yerworth RJ, Bayford RH, Cusick G, Conway M, Holder DS (2002) Design and performance of the UCLH mark 1b 64 channel electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system, optimized for imaging brain function. Physiol Meas 23:149-158
Griffiths H (1988) A phantom for electrical impedance tomography. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 9(Suppl A):15-20
Griffiths H (1995) A Cole phantom for EIT. Physiol Meas 16:A29-38
Griffiths H, Williams RJ (1997) The Cardiff Cole Phantom - A comparison of its theoretical and practical characteristics. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Nice, 328
Rigaud B, Chauveau N, Ayeva B, Fargues F, Martinez E, Morucci J-P (1996) Modular Cole phantom for parametric electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: 18th Ann Conf, Amsterdam, 372-373
Rigaud B, Morucci JP (1996) Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine. Part III: Impedance imaging. First section: general concepts and hardware. Critical reviews in biomedical engineering 24:467-597
Schlappa J, Annese E, Griffiths H (2000) Systematic errors in multi-frequency EIT. Physiol Meas 21:111-118
Schneider ID, Kleffel R, Jennings D, Courtenay AJ (2000) Design of an electrical impedance tomography phantom using active elements. Medical & biological engineering & computing 38:390-394
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hahn, G., Just, A., Hellige, G. (2007). Determination of the dynamic measurement error of EIT systems. In: Scharfetter, H., Merwa, R. (eds) 13th International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance and the 8th Conference on Electrical Impedance Tomography. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73841-1_84
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73841-1_84
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73840-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73841-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)