Skip to main content

Reducing the Representation Complexity of Lattice-Based Taxonomies

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Architectures for Smart Applications (ICCS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4604))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Representing concept lattices constructed from large contexts often results in heavy, complex diagrams that can be impractical to handle and, eventually, to make sense of. In this respect, many concepts could allegedly be dropped from the lattice without impairing its relevance towards a taxonomy description task at a certain level of detail. We propose a method where the notion of stability is introduced to select potentially more pertinent concepts. We present some theoretical properties of stability and discuss several use cases where taxonomy building is an issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wille, R.: Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 23, 493–515 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferré, S., Ridoux, O.: A file system based on concept analysis. In: Palamidessi, C., Moniz Pereira, L., Lloyd, J.W., Dahl, V., Furbach, U., Kerber, M., Lau, K.-K., Sagiv, Y., Stuckey, P.J. (eds.) CL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1861, pp. 1033–1047. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Stumme, G., Taouil, R., Bastide, Y., Pasquier, N., Lakhal, L.: Computing iceberg concept lattices with TITANIC. Data & Knowledge Engineering 42, 189–222 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Roth, C., Obiedkov, S., Kourie, D.G.: Towards concise representation for taxonomies of epistemic communities. In: Ben Yahia, S., Mephu Nguifo, E. (eds.) CLA 4th International Conference on Concept Lattices and their Applications, Tunis, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, pp. 205–218 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roth, C., Bourgine, P.: Lattice-based dynamic and overlapping taxonomies: The case of epistemic communities. Scientometrics 69(2), 429–447 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuznetsov, S.O.: Stability as an estimate of the degree of substantiation of hypotheses derived on the basis of operational similarity. Nauchn. Tekh. Inf., Ser.2 (Automat. Document. Math. Linguist.) 12, 21–29 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuznetsov, S.O.: On stability of a formal concept. In: SanJuan, E. (ed.) JIM, Metz, France (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuznetsov, S.O., Obiedkov, S.: Comparing performance of algorithms for generating concept lattices. J. Expt. Theor. Artif. Intell. 14(2/3), 189–216 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bayardo, Jr., R., Goethals, B., Zaki, M. (eds.): FIMI 2004. Proc. of the IEEE ICDM Workshop on Frequent Itemset Mining Implementations, CEUR-WS.org (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Godin, R., Missaoui, R., Allaoui, H.: Incremental concept formation algorithms based on Galois lattices. Computational Intelligence 11(2), 246–267 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haas, P.: Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46(1), 1–35 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Porter, M.F.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3), 130–137 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, A., Gardner, B.B., Gardner, M.R.: Deep South. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Freeman, L.C., White, D.R.: Using Galois lattices to represent network data. Sociological Methodology 23, 127–146 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman, L.: Finding social groups: A meta-analysis of the southern women data. In: Breiger, R., Carley, K., Pattison, P. (eds.) Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis, pp. 39–97. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Doreian, P.: On the delineation of small group structure. In: Hudson, H.C. (ed.) Classifying Social Data, pp. 215–230. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Atkin, R.: Mathematical Structure in Human Affairs. Heinemann Educational Books, London (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, J.H.: Stars, maximal rectangles, lattices: A new perspective on Q-analysis. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 24(3), 293–299 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wille, R.: Conceptual structures of multicontexts. In: Eklund, P.W., Mann, G.A., Ellis, G. (eds.) ICCS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1115, pp. 23–29. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Uta Priss Simon Polovina Richard Hill

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuznetsov, S., Obiedkov, S., Roth, C. (2007). Reducing the Representation Complexity of Lattice-Based Taxonomies. In: Priss, U., Polovina, S., Hill, R. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Architectures for Smart Applications. ICCS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4604. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73680-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73681-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics