Skip to main content

An Empirical Comparison of Ideal and Empirical ROC-Based Reject Rules

  • Conference paper
Book cover Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLDM 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4571))

  • 3655 Accesses

Abstract

Two class classifiers are used in many complex problems in which the classification results could have serious consequences. In such situations the cost for a wrong classification can be so high that can be convenient to avoid a decision and reject the sample. This paper presents a comparison between two different reject rules (the Chow’s and the ROC rule). In particular, the experiments show that the Chow’s rule is inappropriate when the estimates of the a posteriori probabilities are not reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Webb, A.R.: Statistical Pattern Recognition. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chow, C.K.: On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff. IEEE Trans. Information Theory IT 10, 41–46 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tortorella, F.: A ROC-based reject rule for dichotomizers. Pattern Recognition Letters 26, 167–180 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Santos-Pereira, C.M., Pires, A.M.: On optimal reject rules and ROC curves, Pattern Recognition Letters. Pattern Recognition Letters 26, 943–952 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie, J., Qiu, Z., Wu, J.: Bootstrap methods for reject rules of Fisher LDA. In: Proc. 18th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, 3rd edn., pp. 425–428. IEEE Press, NJ (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Trees, H.L.: Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory. Wiley, New York (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Provost, F., Fawcett, T.: Robust classification for imprecise environments. Machine Learning 42, 203–231 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Mukhopadhyay, N.: Probability and Statistical Inference. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Garthwaite, P.H., Jolliffe, I.T., Jones, B.: Statistical Inference, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Tortorella, F.: Reducing the classification cost of support vector classifiers through an ROC-based reject rule. Pattern Analysis and Applications 7, 128–143 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Blake, C., Keogh, E., Merz, C.J.: UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases, Irvine, University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science (1998), http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html

  12. Huang, J., Ling, C.X.: Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms, IEEE Trans. Knowledgde and Data Engineering 17, 299–310 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Petra Perner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marrocco, C., Molinara, M., Tortorella, F. (2007). An Empirical Comparison of Ideal and Empirical ROC-Based Reject Rules. In: Perner, P. (eds) Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. MLDM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4571. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73499-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73499-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73498-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73499-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics