Abstract
The paper proposes an account of the contrast (noticed in [9]) between the interpretations of the following two discourses: Harvey courts a girl at every convention. {She is very pretty. vs. She always comes to the banquet with him.}. The initial sentence is ambiguous between two quantifier scopings, but the first discourse as a whole allows only for the wide-scope indefinite reading, while the second allows for both. This cross-sentential interaction between quantifier scope and anaphora is captured by means of a new dynamic system couched in classical type logic, which extends Compositional DRT ([16]) with plural information states (modeled, following [24], as sets of variable assignments). Given the underlying type logic, compositionality at sub-clausal level follows automatically and standard techniques from Montague semantics become available. The paper also shows that modal subordination (A wolf might come in. It would eat Harvey first) can be analyzed in a parallel way, i.e. the system captures the anaphoric and quantificational parallels between the individual and modal domains argued for in . In the process, we see that modal/individual-level quantifiers enter anaphoric connections as a matter of course, usually functioning simultaneously as both indefinites and pronouns.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bittner, M.: Topical Referents for Individuals and Possibilities. In: Hastings, R., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 11, CLC, Cornell University, pp. 36–55 (2001)
Brasoveanu, A.: Structured Nominal and Modal Reference. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University (2007a)
Brasoveanu, A.: Donkey Pluralities: Plural Information States vs. Non-atomic Individuals. In: The Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 (to appear)
Farkas, D.F.: Varieties of Indefinites. In: Jackson, B. (ed.) The Proceedings of SALT 12, CLC, Cornell University, pp. 59–84 (2002)
Frank, A.: Context Dependence in Modal Constructions. PhD dissertation, Stuttgart University (1996)
Gallin, D.: Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic with Applications to Montague Semantics. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Amsterdam (1975)
Geurts, B.: Presuppositions and Pronouns. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)
Kamp, H.: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Part 1, pp. 277–322. Mathematical Center, Amsterdam (1981)
Karttunen, L.: Discourse Referents. In: McCawley, J.D. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 7, pp. 363–385. Academic Press, New York (1976)
Kratzer, A.: The National Category of Modality. In: Eikmeyer, H.J., Rieser, H. (eds.) Words, Worlds, and Contexts, pp. 38–74. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1981)
Krifka, M.: Parametric Sum Individuals for Plural Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 555–598 (1996)
Heim, I.: The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, UMass Amherst (1982)
Heim, I.: E-Type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137–177 (1990)
Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press (1973)
Lewis, D.: Adverbs of Quantification. In: Keenan, E. (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 3–15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975)
Muskens, R.: Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 143–186 (1996)
Nouwen, R.: Plural Pronominal Anaphora in Context. PhD Dissertation, University of Utrecht (2003)
Partee, B.: Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70, 601–609 (1973)
Partee, B.: Nominal and Temporal Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286 (1984)
Pelletier, F.J., Schubert, L.K.: Generically Speaking or Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics. In: Chierchia, G., Partee, B.H., Turner, R. (eds.) Properties, Types, and Meanings, vol. 2, pp. 193–268. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1989)
Roberts, C.: Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity. PhD dissertation, UMass Amherst (1987)
Schlenker, P.: Ontological Symmetry in Language: A Brief Manifesto. In: Mind & Language ( to appear)
Stone, M.: Reference to Possible Worlds. RuCCS Report 49, Rutgers University, New Brunswick (1999)
van den Berg, M.: Some Aspects of the Internal Structure of Discourse. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam (1996)
van Rooy, R.: Modal subordination in Questions. In: Hulstijn, J., Nijholt, A. (eds.) The Proceedings of Twendial 1998, pp. 237–248 (1998)
Wang, L., McCready, E., Asher, N.: Information Dependency in Quantificational Subordination. In: Turner, K., von Heusinger, K. (eds.) Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, 2006, Elsevier, Amsterdam (forthcoming)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brasoveanu, A. (2007). Structured Anaphora to Quantifier Domains: A Unified Account of Quantificational and Modal Subordination. In: Leivant, D., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information and Computation. WoLLIC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4576. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73445-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73445-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73443-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73445-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)