Skip to main content

Structured Anaphora to Quantifier Domains: A Unified Account of Quantificational and Modal Subordination

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logic, Language, Information and Computation (WoLLIC 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4576))

  • 660 Accesses

Abstract

The paper proposes an account of the contrast (noticed in [9]) between the interpretations of the following two discourses: Harvey courts a girl at every convention. {She is very pretty. vs. She always comes to the banquet with him.}. The initial sentence is ambiguous between two quantifier scopings, but the first discourse as a whole allows only for the wide-scope indefinite reading, while the second allows for both. This cross-sentential interaction between quantifier scope and anaphora is captured by means of a new dynamic system couched in classical type logic, which extends Compositional DRT ([16]) with plural information states (modeled, following [24], as sets of variable assignments). Given the underlying type logic, compositionality at sub-clausal level follows automatically and standard techniques from Montague semantics become available. The paper also shows that modal subordination (A wolf might come in. It would eat Harvey first) can be analyzed in a parallel way, i.e. the system captures the anaphoric and quantificational parallels between the individual and modal domains argued for in . In the process, we see that modal/individual-level quantifiers enter anaphoric connections as a matter of course, usually functioning simultaneously as both indefinites and pronouns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bittner, M.: Topical Referents for Individuals and Possibilities. In: Hastings, R., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 11, CLC, Cornell University, pp. 36–55 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brasoveanu, A.: Structured Nominal and Modal Reference. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University (2007a)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brasoveanu, A.: Donkey Pluralities: Plural Information States vs. Non-atomic Individuals. In: The Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farkas, D.F.: Varieties of Indefinites. In: Jackson, B. (ed.) The Proceedings of SALT 12, CLC, Cornell University, pp. 59–84 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frank, A.: Context Dependence in Modal Constructions. PhD dissertation, Stuttgart University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gallin, D.: Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic with Applications to Montague Semantics. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Amsterdam (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Geurts, B.: Presuppositions and Pronouns. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kamp, H.: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Part 1, pp. 277–322. Mathematical Center, Amsterdam (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karttunen, L.: Discourse Referents. In: McCawley, J.D. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 7, pp. 363–385. Academic Press, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kratzer, A.: The National Category of Modality. In: Eikmeyer, H.J., Rieser, H. (eds.) Words, Worlds, and Contexts, pp. 38–74. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krifka, M.: Parametric Sum Individuals for Plural Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 555–598 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heim, I.: The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, UMass Amherst (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heim, I.: E-Type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137–177 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis, D.: Adverbs of Quantification. In: Keenan, E. (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 3–15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muskens, R.: Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 143–186 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nouwen, R.: Plural Pronominal Anaphora in Context. PhD Dissertation, University of Utrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Partee, B.: Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70, 601–609 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Partee, B.: Nominal and Temporal Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pelletier, F.J., Schubert, L.K.: Generically Speaking or Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics. In: Chierchia, G., Partee, B.H., Turner, R. (eds.) Properties, Types, and Meanings, vol. 2, pp. 193–268. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, C.: Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity. PhD dissertation, UMass Amherst (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schlenker, P.: Ontological Symmetry in Language: A Brief Manifesto. In: Mind & Language ( to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stone, M.: Reference to Possible Worlds. RuCCS Report 49, Rutgers University, New Brunswick (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van den Berg, M.: Some Aspects of the Internal Structure of Discourse. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Rooy, R.: Modal subordination in Questions. In: Hulstijn, J., Nijholt, A. (eds.) The Proceedings of Twendial 1998, pp. 237–248 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, L., McCready, E., Asher, N.: Information Dependency in Quantificational Subordination. In: Turner, K., von Heusinger, K. (eds.) Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, 2006, Elsevier, Amsterdam (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Daniel Leivant Ruy de Queiroz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brasoveanu, A. (2007). Structured Anaphora to Quantifier Domains: A Unified Account of Quantificational and Modal Subordination. In: Leivant, D., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information and Computation. WoLLIC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4576. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73445-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73445-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73443-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73445-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics