Abstract
The Electoral College remains a controversial feature of U.S. political decision-making. After most U.S. presidential elections, there are calls for passage of a constitutional amendment to either abolish it or to ‘reform’ it substantially. There are numerous complaints about the Electoral College, of which the most important is the potential for the winner of the Electoral College majority to be a popular vote loser. Consider three assertions that often surface in the debates about the political impact of the Electoral College.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Banzhaf, J.F. (1965) Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis, Rutgers Law Review 19: 317–343.
Brams, S.J. and Davis, M. (1974) The 3/2ths Rule in Presidential Campaigning, American Political Science Review 68: 113–134.
Chamberlain, G. and Rothschild, M. (1981) A Note on the Probability of Casting a Decisive Vote, Journal of Economic Theory 25: 152–162.
Cox, G.W. (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems, Cambridge University Press.
Duverger, M. (1959) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, John Wiley.
Edwards, G.C. (2004) Why the Electoral College is Bad for America, Yale University Press.
Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M. (1998)The Measurement of Voting Power. Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes, Edward Elgar.
Gaines, B. (1999). Duverger’s Law and the Meaning of Canadian Exceptionalism, Comparative Political Studies 32: 835–861.
Gelman, A. Katz, J. and Bafumi, J. (2004) Standard Voting Power Indexes Do Not Work: An Empirical Analysis, British Journal of Political Science 34: 657–674.
Good, I.J. and Meyer, L.S. (1975) Estimating the Efficacy of a Vote, Behavioral Science 20: 25–33.
Grofman, B., Koetzle, W. and Brunell, T. (1997) An Integrated Perspective on the Three Potential Sources of Partisan Bias: Malapportionment, Turnout Differences, and the Geographic Distribution of Party Vote Shares, Electoral Studies 16: 457–470.
Groseclose, T. and Snyder, J.M. (2000) Vote Buying, Supermajorities, and Flooded Coalitions, American Political Science Review 94: 683–684.
Kimberling, W.C. (2004) The Electoral College, U.S. Federal Election Commission, Office of Election Administration.
Madison, J. (1823) ‘Letter to John Hay, August 23, 1823’, in Max Farrand (ed.) The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 (rev. ed.) vol. 3, Yale University Press (1966).
Natapoff, A. (2004) ‘The Electoral College’, Presentation to the Colloquium Series of the Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, October 2004.
Owen, G. (1972) Multilinear Extensions of Games, Management Science 18: 64–79.
Owen, G. (1975) Evaluation of a Presidential Election Game, American Political Science Review 69: 947–953.
Owen, G. (1995) Game Theory, Academic Press.
Shapley, L.S. Mann, I. (1962) Values of Large Games, VI: Evaluating the Electoral College Exactly, RM-3158-PR. The RAND Corporation.
Shaw, D. (2003) A Simple Game: Uncovering Campaign Effects in the 2000 Presidential Election. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, University of Texas, Austin.
Tufte, E. (1973) The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems, American Political Science Review 67: 540–554.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Owen, G., Lindner, I., Grofman, B. (2008). Modified Power Indices for Indirect Voting. In: Braham, M., Steffen, F. (eds) Power, Freedom, and Voting. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73382-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73382-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73381-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73382-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)