Skip to main content

Further Reflections on the Expediency and Stability of Alliances

  • Chapter
Power, Freedom, and Voting

Abstract

The study of the formation and dissolution of alliances of voters aiming to increase their voting power is relatively new. The present note is a sequel to our earlier paper on this subject (see Felsenthal and Machover 2002). Since the latter’s publication, we have obtained some new results which can be viewed also as a complement to some of the results obtained by Gelman (2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andjiga, N.G., Badirou, D. and Mbih, B. (2006) On the Evaluation of Power in Parliaments and Government Formation, mimeo. http://crem.univ.rennes1.fr/site_francais/doctravail/2006/ie-200618.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, V.C.H. and Felsenthal, D.S. (2008) Coalition Formation Theories Revisited: An empirical investigation of Aumann’s Hypothesis, in M. Braham and F. Steffen (eds) Power, Freedom, and Voting, Springer, 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, E. (Interviewer) (1997) On the State of the Art in Game Theory: An Interview with Robert Aumann, in W. Albers et al. (eds) Understanding Strategic Interaction: Essays in Honor of Reinhard Selten, Springer. Reprinted in Games and Economic Behavior 24 (1998): 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M. (1998) The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M. (2000) Voting Power and Parliamentary Defections: the 1953–54 French National Assembly Revisited, mimeo. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/00000594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M. (2002) Annexations and Alliances: When are Blocs Advantageous A Priori? Social Choice and Welfare 19: 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. (2003) Forming Voting Blocs and Coalitions as a Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Possible Theoretical Explanation for Political Instability, Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 2, Article 13, 1–14. http://bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol2/iss1/art13

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (1982) Modification of the Banzhaf-Coleman Index for Games with A Priori Unions, in M.J. Holler (ed.) Power, Voting, and Voting Power, Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1959) A Test of the Adequacy of the Power Index, Behavioral Science 4: 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M. (1954) A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System, American Political Science Review 48: 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Felsenthal, D.S., Machover, M. (2008). Further Reflections on the Expediency and Stability of Alliances. In: Braham, M., Steffen, F. (eds) Power, Freedom, and Voting. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73382-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics