Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Rural Analysis and Management pp 125–158Cite as

A Synthetic Approach

  • Chapter

  • 862 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Bibliography Used

  • D. Alard and I. Poudevigne, ‘Factors controlling plant diversity in a rural landscape: a functional approach’, Landscape and Urban Planning 46 (1999), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Appleton and A. Lovett, ‘GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining “sufficient” realism for environmental decision-making’, Landscape and Urban Planning 65 (2003), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Appleton, A. Lovett, G. Sunnenberg and T. Dockerty, ‘Rural landscape visualisation from GIS databases: a comparison of approaches, options and problems’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26 (2002), 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Arriaza, J. F. Canas-Ortega, J. A. Canas-Madueno and P. Ruiz-Aviles, ‘Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes’, Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2004), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Brans, C. Macharis, P. L. Kunsch, A. Chevalier and M. Schwaninger, ’Combining multicriteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic processes. An iterative real-time procedure’, European Journal of Operational Research 109 (1998), 428–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Brush, R. E. Chenoweth and T. Barman, ‘Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes’, Landscape and Urban Planning 47 (2000), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Burel and J. Baudry, ‘Social, aesthetic and ecological aspects of hedgerows in rural landscapes as a framework for greenways’, Landscape and Urban Planning 33 (1995), 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Claval, ‘Reading the rural landscapes’, Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. D’haeze, J. Deckers, D. Raes, T. A. Phong and H. V. Loi, ‘Environmental and socio-economic impacts of institutional reforms on the agricultural sector of Vietnam: Land suitability assessment for Robusta coffee in the Dak Gan region’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105 (2005), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Erickson, R. L. Ryan and R. De Young, ‘Woodlots in the rural landscape: landowner motivations and management attitudes in a Michigan (USA) case study’, Landscape and Urban Planning 58 (2002), 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Fedorowick, ‘A landscape restoration framework for wildlife and agriculture in the rural landscape’, Landscape and Urban Planning 27 (1993), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. N. Fu, H. J. Guo, A. G. Chen and J. Y. Cui, ‘Fallow agroecosystem dynamics and socioeconomic development in China: Two case studies in Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Yunnan Province’, Mountain Research And Development 25 (2005), 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Brown, I. Washitani, A. Tsunekawa, M. Yokohari (Eds.), Satoyama. The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2003, 229 pp., ISBN 4-431-00007-0 (85 figures)’,

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. W. Guo, X. M. Xiao, Y. L. Gan and Y. J. Zheng, ‘Landscape planning for a rural ecosystem: case study of a resettlement area for residents from land submerged by the Three Gorges Reservoir, China’, Landscape Ecology 18 (2003), 503–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. P. Hanley, C. L. Mason and J. B. McCarter, ‘Landscape management system: Bringing training to rural forest managers’, Journal Of Forestry 100 (2002), 5–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Herben, Z. Munzbergova, M. Milden, J. Ehrlen, S. A. O. Cousins and O. Eriksson, ‘Long-term spatial dynamics of Succisa pratensis in a changing rural landscape: linking dynamical modelling with historical maps’, Journal Of Ecology 94 (2006), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. K. Hong, N. Nakagoshi and M. Kamada, ‘Human Impacts On Pine-Dominated Vegetation In Rural Landscapes In Korea And Western Japan’, Vegetatio 116 (1995), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Hovardas and G. P. Stamou, ‘Structural and narrative reconstruction of rural residents’ representations of “nature”, “wildlife”, and “landscape”’, Biodiversity And Conservation 15 (2006), 1745–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Iiyama, M. Kamada and N. Nakagoshi, ‘Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan’, Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Iiyama, M. Kamada and N. Nakagoshi, ‘Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan (vol 70, pg 301, 2005)’, Landscape and Urban Planning 73 (2005), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. Kato, M. Yokohari and R. D. Brown, ‘Integration and visualization of the ecological value of rural landscapes in maintaining the physical environment of Japan’, Landscape and Urban Planning 39 (1997), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Kennedy and N. E. Koch, ‘Viewing and managing natural resources as human-ecosystem relationships’, Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004), 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Kunsch, A. Chevalier and J. P. Brans, ‘Comparing the adaptive control methodology (ACM) to the financial planning practice of a large international group’, European Journal of Operational Research 132 (2001), 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Lafortezza and R. D. Brown, ‘A framework for landscape ecological design of new patches in the rural landscape’, Environmental Management 34 (2004), 461–473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. LaGro, ‘Landscape context of rural residential development in southeastern Wisconsin (USA)’, Landscape Ecology 13 (1998), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Lee, F. Pena-Mora and M. Park, ‘Quality and change management model for large scale concurrent design and construction projects’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-Asce 131 (2005), 890–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Lee, F. Pena-Mora and M. Park, ‘Web-enabled system dynamics model for error and change management on concurrent design and construction projects’, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 20 (2006), 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. H. Lee, F. Pena-Mora and M. Park, ‘Dynamic planning and control methodology for strategic and operational construction project management’, Automation in Construction 15 (2006), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Lynch and R. H. Gimblett, ‘Perceptual values in the cultural landscape: A computer model for assessing and mapping perceived mystery in rural environments’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 16 (1992), 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Lynch and R. H. Gimblett, ‘Perceptual Values In The Cultural Landscape - A Computer-Model For Assessing And Mapping Perceived Mystery In Rural Environments’, Computers Environment And Urban Systems 16 (1992), 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. E. Maani and V. Maharaj, ‘Links between systems thinking and complex decision making’, System Dynamics Review 20 (2004), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Makhzoumi, ‘The changing role of rural landscapes: olive and carob multi-use tree plantations in the semiarid Mediterranean’, Landscape and Urban Planning 37 (1997), 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Moss and L. S. Davis, ‘Measurement of spatial change in the forest component of the rural landscape of southern Ontario’, Applied Geography 14 (1994), 214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Nagaike and T. Kamitani, ‘Factors affecting changes in landscape diversity in rural areas of the Fagus crenata forest region of central Japan’, Landscape and Urban Planning 43 (1999), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. Natori, W. Fukui and M. Hikasa, ‘Empowering nature conservation in Japanese rural areas: a planning strategy integrating visual and biological landscape perspectives’, Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005), 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Nautiyal, R. K. Maikhuri, R. L. Semwal, K. S. Rao and K. G. Saxena, ‘Agroforestry systems in the rural landscape - a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India’, Agroforestry Systems 41 (1998), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Neal, ‘Rural landscapes, representations and racism: examining multicultural citizenship and policy-making in the English countryside’, Ethnic And Racial Studies 25 (2002), 442–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Olsson and C. Folke, ‘Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: A study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden’, Ecosystems 4 (2001), 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Palang, S. Helmfrid, M. Antrop and H. Alumae, ‘Rural Landscapes: past processes and future strategies’, Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Palang, A. Printsmann, E. K. Gyuro, M. Urbanc, E. Skowronek and W. Woloszyn, ‘The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe’, Landscape Ecology 21 (2006), 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Paquette and G. Domon, ‘Changing ruralities, changing landscapes: exploring social recomposition using a multi-scale approach’, Journal of Rural Studies 19 (2003), 425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Pauwels and H. Gulinck, ‘Changing minor rural road networks in relation to landscape sustainability and farming practices in West Europe’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 77 (2000), 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Pinto-Correia, ‘Future development in Portuguese rural areas: how to manage agricultural support for landscape conservation?’ Landscape and Urban Planning 50 (2000), 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Poudevigne and D. Alard, ‘Landscape and agricultural patterns in rural areas: a case study in the Brionne basin, Normandy, France’, Journal Of Environmental Management 50 (1997), 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Poudevigne, S. vanRooij, P. Morin and D. Alard, ‘Dynamics of rural landscapes and their main driving factors: A case study in the Seine Valley, Normandy, France’, Landscape and Urban Planning 38 (1997), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Purtauf, J. Dauber and V. Wolters, ‘Carabid communities in the spatio-temporal mosaic of a rural landscape’, Landscape and Urban Planning 67 (2004), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Selman and N. Doar, ‘An Investigation Of The Potential For Landscape Ecology To Act As A Basis For Rural Land-Use Plans’, Journal of Environmental Management 35 (1992), 281–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Skowronek, R. Krukowska, A. Swieca and A. Tucki, ‘The evolution of rural landscapes in mid-eastern Poland as exemplified by selected villages’, Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Tahvanainen, L. Tyrvainen and I. Nousiainen, ‘Effect of afforestation on the scenic value of rural landscape’, Scandinavian Journal Of Forest Research 11 (1996), 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Tress, G. Tress and G. Fry, ‘Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice’, Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Tyrvainen and L. Tahvanainen, ‘Using computer graphics for assessing the aesthetic value of large-scale rural landscapes’, Scandinavian Journal Of Forest Research 14 (1999), 282–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. H. P. van der Vaart, ‘Towards a new rural landscape: consequences of non-agricultural re-use of redundant farm buildings in Friesland’, Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005), 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Vogeler, ‘State hegemony in transforming the in rural landscapes of eastern Germany: 1945-1994’, Annals Of The Association Of American Geographers 86 (1996), 432–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Volker, ‘Adapted Farming Systems For A Rural Landscape - A Social Typology Of Dutch Farmers’, Sociologia Ruralis 32 (1992), 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Volker, ‘Local commitment for sustainable rural landscape development’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 63 (1997), 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Z. R. Yu, J. Baudry, B. P. Zhao, H. Zhang and S. Q. Li, ‘Vegetation components of a subtropical rural landscape in China’, Critical Reviews In Plant Sciences 18 (1999), 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Z. Z. Zhou, ‘Landscape changes in a rural area in China’, Landscape and Urban Planning 47 (2000), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental Sciences, ICAM, Avda. Carlos III s/n, 45004, Toledo, Spain

    Francisco J. Tapiador

Authors
  1. Francisco J. Tapiador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tapiador, F.J. (2008). A Synthetic Approach. In: Rural Analysis and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73343-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation