Skip to main content

Methodological Notes on Analysis, Synthesis and Management

  • Chapter
Rural Analysis and Management
  • 863 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Bibliography Used

  • C. J. Andrews, ‘Analyzing quality-of-place’, Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 28 (2001), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Blackorby, W. Bossert and D. Donaldson, ‘Intertemporal Population Ethics - Critical-Level Utilitarian Principles’, Econometrica 63 (1995), 1303–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Blowers, ‘Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology - Faludi, A’, Regional Studies 21 (1987), 279–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. S. Bolan, ‘Planning ethics: A reader in planning theory, practice and education - Hendler, S’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 (1996), 66–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Bonn and J. Fisher, ‘Corporate governance and business ethics: insights from the strategic planning experience’, Corporate Governance-an International Review 13 (2005), 730–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Bor, ‘Toward a New Planning Methodology’, Journal of Town Planning Institute 52 (1966), 405–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Brownhill and L. Merricks, ‘Ethics and science: Educating the public’, Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2002), 43–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • E. K. Burns, ‘Planning ethics: A reader in planning theory, practice and education’, Urban Geography 18 (1997), 469–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Burrows, ‘Essay Review - the Greening of Business and Its Relationship to Business Ethics’, Long Range Planning 26 (1993), 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Campbell and R. Marshall, ‘Moral obligations, planning, and the public interest: a commentary on current British practice’, Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 27 (2000), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Campbell and R. Marshall, ‘Towards justice in planning: A reappraisal’, European Planning Studies 14 (2006), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Catanese, ‘Ethics in Planning - Wachs, M’, Growth and Change 17 (1986), 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Cogan, ‘Planning ethics: A reader in planning theory, practice, and education - Hendler, S’, Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (1996), 264–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Collins, ‘Dilemmas of Planning Practice - Ethics, Legitimacy and the Validation of Knowledge - Thomas, H, Healey, P’, Regional Studies 26 (1992), 215–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Cormio, M. Dicorato, A. Minoia and M. Trovato, ‘A regional energy planning methodology including renewable energy sources and environmental constraints’, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 7 (2003), 99–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Cragg, D. Pearson and J. Cooney, ‘Ethics, surface mining and the environment’, Resources Policy 21 (1995), 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Darke, ‘Dilemmas of Planning Practice - Ethics, Legitimacy, and the Validation of Knowledge - Thomas, H, Healey, P’, Environment and Planning A 24 (1992), 452–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Darke, ‘Planning ethics: A reader in planning theory, practice and education - Hendler, S’, Environment and Planning A 29 (1997), 373–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Donnelley, ‘Nature, polis, ethics - Chicago regional planning’, Hastings Center Report 28 (1998), S1–S1.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Eriksson, A. Ek and G. Johansson, ‘Design and evaluation of a software prototype for participatory planning of environmental adaptations’, Ieee Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8 (2000), 94–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • A. Faludi, ‘Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology’, Urban Studies 20 (1983), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Faludi, ‘Why in planning The Myth of the Framework is anything but that’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (1998), 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. A. Fox, ‘Describing and measuring socioeconomic systems: Prerequisites to planning’, Social Indicators Research 39 (1996), 281–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Gleeson and R. Kearns, ‘Remoralising landscapes of care’, Environment and Planning D-Society & Space 19 (2001), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Goulet, ‘Ethics of Development-Planning’, Studies in Comparative International Development 11 (1976), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Gross and J. Talavage, ‘Multiple-Objective Planning Methodology for Information-Service Managers’, Information Processing & Management 15 (1979), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Holecek, ‘System Elements in Long-Term Planning Methodology’, Politicka Ekonomie 30 (1982), 1071–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Home, ‘Measuring Trends in Town-Planning Control through Decision Statistics’, Local Government Studies 13 (1987), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hooper, ‘Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology - Faludi, A’, Town Planning Review 57 (1986), 334–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Hoover, ‘A View of Ethics and Planning’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners 27 (1961), 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Howe and J. Kaufman, ‘Ethics and Professional Practice in Planning and Related Policy Professions’, Policy Studies Journal 9 (1981), 585–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. B. Johnson, ‘Ethical issues in risk communication: Continuing the discussion’, Risk Analysis 19 (1999), 335–348.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kihl, ‘Planning ethics: A reader in planning theory, practice, and education - Hendler, S’, Policy Studies Journal 23 (1995), 551–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. G. Kim, S. H. Yu and J. H. Lee, ‘Knowledge strategy planning: methodology and case’, Expert Systems with Applications 24 (2003), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. W. Lake, ‘Planning and Applied Geography - Positivism, Ethics, and Geographic Information-Systems’, Progress in Human Geography 17 (1993), 404–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Macbeth, ‘Towards an ethics platform for tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research 32 (2005), 962–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. J. Mandelbaum, ‘Ethics in Planning - Wachs, M’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5 (1986), 830–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. J. Mandelbaum, ‘Acting on Ethics in City-Planning - Howe, E’, Journal of Urban Affairs 17 (1995), 328–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Marcuse, ‘Professional Ethics and Beyond - Values in Planning’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners 42 (1976), 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Marcuse, ‘On Ethics, History, and Planning Practice’, Journal of the American Planning Association 55 (1989), 500–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Mitchell, ‘Ethics in Planning – Wachs, M’, Professional Geographer 38 (1986), 456–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. C. Perry, ‘Dilemmas of Planning Practice - Ethics, Legitimacy and the Validation of Knowledge - Thomas, H, Healey, P’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 (1994), 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Richmond, ‘Ethics in Planning - Wachs, M’, Journal of the American Planning Association 52 (1986), 370–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Rubenstein, ‘Acting on Ethics in City-Planning - Howe, E’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85 (1995), 612–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. E. Salkin, ‘Legal ethics and land-use planning’, Urban Lawyer 30 (1998), 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Thomas, ‘Planning ethics: A reader in planning theory, practices and education - Hendler, S’, Urban Studies 33 (1996), 1233–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Townley, ‘Managerial technologies, ethics and managing’, Journal of Management Studies 41 (2004), 424–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Tyrwhitt, ‘Idea Method - New Development in Regional Planning Methodology’, Ekistics 26 (1968), 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Verma and T. Clapp, ‘Planning ethics: A render in planning theory, practice and education’, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 15 (1998), 173–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wachs, ‘Ethics in Planning’. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Whitehead, ‘Addressing Planning Methodology - Unanswered Questions - a Review Article’, Town Planning Review 59 (1988), 325–328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tapiador, F.J. (2008). Methodological Notes on Analysis, Synthesis and Management. In: Rural Analysis and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73343-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics