Skip to main content

Heider vs Simmel: Emergent Features in Dynamic Structures

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 4503))

Abstract

Heider’s balance theory is ubiquitous in the field of social networks as an explanation for why we so frequently observe symmetry and transitivity in social relations. We propose that Simmelian tie theory could explain the same phenomena without resorting to motivational tautologies that characterize psychological explanations. Further, while both theories predict the same equilibrium state, we argue that they suggest different processes by which this equilibrium is reached. We develop a dynamic exponential random graph model (ERGM) and apply it to the classic panel data collected by Newcomb to empirically explore these two theories. We find strong evidence that Simmelian triads exist and are stable beyond what would be expected through Heiderian tendencies in the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Heider, F.: Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology 21, 107–112 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, J.A.: Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations 30, 181–187 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Flament, C.: Independent generalizations of balance. In: Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S. (eds.) Perspectives on Social Network Research, pp. 187–200. Academic Press, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doreian, P., Krackhardt, D.: Pre-transitive balance mechanisms for signed networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25, 43–67 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cartwright, D., Harary, F.: Structural balance: a generalization of heider’s theory. Psychological Review 63, 277–293 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, J.A.: The davis /holland /leinhardt studies: An overview. In: Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S. (eds.) Perspectives on Social Network Research, pp. 51–62. Academic Press, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: Some evidence on the transitivity of positive interpersonal sentiment. American Journal of Sociology 72, 1205–1209 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: Local structure in social networks. In: Heise, D.R. (ed.) Sociological Methodology, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krackhardt, D., Kilduff, M.: Whether close or far: Perceptions of balance in friendship networks in organizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, 770–782 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simmel, G.: The Sociology of Georg Simmel. The Free Press, New York (1908/1950)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krackhardt, D.: Simmelian ties: Super strong and sticky. In: Kramer, R., Neale, M. (eds.) Power and Influence in Organizations, pp. 21–38. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luce, R.D., Perry, A.D.: A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika 14, 95–116 (1949)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gower, J.C.: The analysis of asymmetry and orthogonality. In: Barra, J., Boudreau, F., Romier, G. (eds.) Recent Developments in Statistics, pp. 109–123. North-Holland, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman, L.C.: Uncovering organizational hierarchies. Computational and Mathematical Organizational Theory 3(1), 5–18 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Newcomb, T.N.: The Acquaintance Process. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krackhardt, D.: The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 16, 183–210 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lorrain, F., White, H.: Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks blockstructures with covariates. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1, 49–80 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76(373) (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frank, O., Strauss, D.: Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(395), 832–842 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Morris, M.: Local rules and global properties: Modeling the emergence of network structure. In: Breiger, R., Carley, K., Pattison, P. (eds.) Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis, pp. 174–186. Committee on Human Factors, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter, D.R., Handcock, M.S.: Inference in curved exponential family models for networks. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15, 482–500 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D.R., Butts, C.T., Goodreau, S.M., Morris, M.: statnet: An R package for the Statistical Modeling of Social Networks. (2003), http://csde.washington.edu/statnet

  23. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Edoardo Airoldi David M. Blei Stephen E. Fienberg Anna Goldenberg Eric P. Xing Alice X. Zheng

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krackhardt, D., Handcock, M.S. (2007). Heider vs Simmel: Emergent Features in Dynamic Structures. In: Airoldi, E., Blei, D.M., Fienberg, S.E., Goldenberg, A., Xing, E.P., Zheng, A.X. (eds) Statistical Network Analysis: Models, Issues, and New Directions. ICML 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4503. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73133-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73133-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73132-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73133-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics