Skip to main content

Supporting User-Defined Notations When Integrating Scientific Text-Editors with Proof Assistance Systems

  • Conference paper
Towards Mechanized Mathematical Assistants (MKM 2007, Calculemus 2007)

Abstract

In order to foster the use of proof assistance systems, we integrated the proof assistance system Ωmega with the standard scientific text-editor \({\rm\kern-.15em T\kern-.1667em\lower.7ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX}\) \(_{\rm {\sc MACS}}\). We aim at a document-centric approach to formalizing and verifying mathematics and software. Assisted by the proof assistance system, the author writes her document entirely inside the text-editor in a language she is used to, that is a mixture of natural language and formulas in \({\rm L\kern-.36em\raise.3ex\hbox{\sc a}\kern-.15em T\kern-.1667em\lower.7ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX}\) style. We present a basic mechanism that allows the author to define her own notation inside a document in a natural way, and use it to parse the formulas written by the author as well as to render the formulas generated by the proof assistance system. To make this mechanism effectively usable in an interactive and dynamic authoring environment, we extend it to efficiently accommodate modifications of notations, to track dependencies to ensure the right order of notations and formulas, to use the hierarchical structure of theories to prevent ambiguities, and to reuse concepts together with their notation from other documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) Version 2.0. W3c recommendation 21 february 2001. Technical report (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2

  2. Asperti, A., Sacerdoti-Coen, C., Tassi, E., Zacchiroli, S.: User interaction with the matita proof assistant. Journal of Automated Reasoning, Special Issue on User Interfaces for Theorem Proving (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coen, C.S., Zacchiroli, S.: Efficient ambiguous parsing of mathematical formulae. In: Asperti, A., Bancerek, G., Trybulec, A. (eds.) MKM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3119, pp. 347–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kamareddine, F., Maarek, M., Wells, J.B.: Toward an object-oriented structure for mathematical text. In: Kohlhase, M. (ed.) MKM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3863, pp. 217–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kohlhase, M.: OMDoc – An Open Markup Format for Mathematical Documents [version 1.2]. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4180. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mossakowski, T., Autexier, S., Hutter, D.: Development graphs - proof management for structured specifications. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, special issue on Algebraic Specification and Development Techniques 67(1-2), 114–145 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Nipkow, T., Paulson, L.C., Wenzel, M.: Isabelle/HOL. LNCS, vol. 2283. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Padovani, L., Zacchiroli, S.: From notation to semantics: There and back again! In: Borwein, J.M., Farmer, W.M. (eds.) MKM 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4108, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bundy, A., McCasland, R.: Mathsaid: A mathematical theorem discovery tool. In: Proceedings of SYNASC 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van der Hoeven, J.: Gnu TEXMACS: A free, structured, wysiwyg and technical text editor. Number 39-40 in Cahiers GUTenberg (May 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner, M.: Mediation between text-editors and proof assistance systems. Diploma thesis, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wagner, M., Autexier, S., Benzmüller, C.: PlatΩ: A mediator between text-editors and proof assistance systems. In: Autexier, S., Benzmüller, C. (eds.) UITP 2006. 7th Workshop on User Interfaces for Theorem Provers. ENTCS, Elsevier, North-Holland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Waite, W., Goos, G.: Compiler Construction. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilhelm, R., Maurer, D.: Übersetzerbau - Theorie, Konstruktion, Generierung, 2. Auflage. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Manuel Kauers Manfred Kerber Robert Miner Wolfgang Windsteiger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Autexier, S., Fiedler, A., Neumann, T., Wagner, M. (2007). Supporting User-Defined Notations When Integrating Scientific Text-Editors with Proof Assistance Systems. In: Kauers, M., Kerber, M., Miner, R., Windsteiger, W. (eds) Towards Mechanized Mathematical Assistants. MKM Calculemus 2007 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4573. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73086-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73086-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73083-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73086-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics