Skip to main content

Supporting Factors to Improve the Explanatory Potential of Contrast Set Mining: Analyzing Brain Ischaemia Data

  • Conference paper
11th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biomedical Engineering and Computing 2007

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 16))

  • 61 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of exploratory pattern mining is to find patterns that exhibit yet unknown relationships in data and to provide insightful representations of detected relationships. This paper explores contrast set mining and an approach to improving its explanatory potential by using the so called supporting factors that provide additional descriptions of the detected patterns. The proposed methodology is described in a medical data analysis problem of distinguishing between similar diseases in the analysis of patients suffering from brain ischaemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Wrobel (1997) An algorithm for multi-relational discovery of subgroups. In Proc. of the First European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1997, pp. 78–87, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bay S D, Pazzani M J (2001) Detecting group differences: Mining contrast sets. Data Min Knowl Discov 5(3):213–246

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong G, Li J (1999) Efficient Mining of Emerging Patterns: Discovering Trends and Differences. In Proc. of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 1999, pp 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quinlan J R (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufman Publishers Inc

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark P, Niblett T (1989) The CN2 induction algorithm. Machine Learning 3(4):261–283, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gamberger D, Lavrac Nada, Krstacic G (2003) Active subgroup mining: a case study in coronary heart disease risk group detection. Artif intell med [Print ed.] 28:27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kralj P, Lavrac N, Gramberger D, Krstacic A (2007) Contrast Set Mining through Subgroup Discovery: Applied to Brain Ischaemina Data. In proc. of the11th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2007, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Victor M, Ropper A H (2001) Cerebrovascular disease. In Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology, 2001, pp. 821–924

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fürnkranz J (2001) Round robin rule learning. In Proc. of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2001, pp 146–153

    Google Scholar 

  10. Demsar J, Zupan B, Leban G (2004) Orange: From Experimental Machine Learning to Interactive Data Mining, White Paper (www.ailab.si/orange), Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kavsek B, Lavrac N (2006) APRIORI-SD: Adapting association rule learning to subgroup discovery. Appl artif intell 2006, pp.543–583

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gamberger D, Lavrac N, Krstacic G (2003) Active subgroup mining: a case study in coronary heart disease risk group detection. Artif intell med 28:27–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lowry R (2007) Concepts and applications of inferential statistics. http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/webtext.html

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lavrac N, Cestnik B, Gamberger D, Flach P (2004) Decision support through subgroup discovery: three case studies and the lessons learned. Mach. learn. [Print ed.], 2004, vol. 57, pp. 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kralj, P., Lavrac, N., Gamberger, D., Krstacic, A. (2007). Supporting Factors to Improve the Explanatory Potential of Contrast Set Mining: Analyzing Brain Ischaemia Data. In: Jarm, T., Kramar, P., Zupanic, A. (eds) 11th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biomedical Engineering and Computing 2007. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 16. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73044-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73044-6_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73043-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73044-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics