Abstract
In this paper a psychologist discusses the desirable relationship between the elderly and Artificial Objects based on some questions raised by an engineering researcher. Concretely, the paper discusses the differences between Objects, Machines, and Artificial Objects. Through this, it reveals the characteristic of Artificial Objects and presents the following four points that can be potentially problematic with respect to the relationship between such objects and the elderly. Moreover, these points should also be kept in mind by engineering researchers when developing Artificial Objects. 1) Artificial objects move autonomously, and therefore users can not take the role of initiator. That is, people must accommodate to artificial objects. 2) Artificial objects still only have a limited learning ability for creating relationships with their users, including the understanding of contexts and a shared history not unlike that between people. 3) Even with increased leaning ability as a result of increased efficacy and expanded operating capacity, which in turn leads to the creation of better relationships between artificial objects and persons, there are limitations to such relationships. 4) There is a need to point out the problem of initially focusing too heavily on the functions that artificial objects should have. Especially for the elderly, engineers should take time to consider the relationships of dependency that the objects they design will gradually foster over time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bernstein, N.A.: On Dexterity and Its Development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ (1996)
Erikson, J., Mataric, M.J., Winstein, C.J.: Hand-off Assistive Robotics for Post-Stroke Arm Rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/ 9h International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Chicago (2005), http://robotics.usc.edu/
Johnson, M.H., Motion, J.: Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition. Blackwell, US (1991)
Rowles, G.D., Oswald, F., Hunter, E.G.: Interior Living Environments in Old Age. In: Wahl, H.W., Scheidt, R.J. (eds.) Annual Review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol. 23, pp. 167–194. Springer, NY (2003)
Rubinstein, R.L.: The Significance of Personal Objects to Older People. Journal of Aging Studies 1(3), 225–238 (1987)
Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, NJ (1995)
Sherman, E., Newman, E.S.: The Meaning of Cherished Personal Possessions for the Elderly. INT’L Journal of Aging and Human Development 8(2), 181–192 (1977)
Sherman, E.: Reminiscentia: Cherished Objects as Memorabilia in Late-Life Reminiscence. INT’L Journal of Aging and Human Development 33(2), 89–100 (1991)
Sherman, E., Dacher, J.: Cherished Objects and the Home: Their Meaning and Roles in Late Life. In: Rowles, G.D., Chaudhury, H. (eds.) Home and Identity in Late Life, pp. 63–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Wapner, S., Demick, J., Redondo, J.P.: Cherished Possessions and Adaptation of Older People to Nursing Home. INT’L Journal of Aging and Human Development 31(3), 219–235 (1990)
Winnicott, D.W.: Playing and reality. Harmondsworth, Penguin (1974)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Matsumoto, K., Obinata, G. (2007). Toward a Desirable Relationship of Artificial Objects and the Elderly: From the Standpoint of Engineer and Psychologist Dialogue. In: Okadome, T., Yamazaki, T., Makhtari, M. (eds) Pervasive Computing for Quality of Life Enhancement. ICOST 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73035-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73035-4_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73034-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73035-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)