Abstract
As is the case with other surgical specialties, urologic practice has witnessed major breakthroughs throughout its history. Achievements such as the introduction of anesthesia in the 1840s and that of introducing penicillin in the 1940s have had a profound and lasting affect on the way urology is practiced. It is on this very same note that the revolution in information technology has to be seen, as current advances will undoubtedly again alter urology as we now know it. These exciting new frontiers have been made possible by the rapid expansion of the Internet, development in telecommunication infrastructures, an ever-multiplying computing power, and the increasing sophistication of robotics. Consequently, telesurgical urology became an inevitability, dictated not only by the incipient possibility but also by needs and necessities inherent to the specialty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
 1. Bauer J, Lee BR, Stoianovici D et al (2001) Remote percutaneous renal access using a new automated telesurgical robotic system. Telemed J E Health 7:341–346
 2. Bove P Stoianovici D, Micali S et al (2003) Is telesurgery a new reality? Our experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous procedures. J Endourol 17:137–142
 3. Buckingham RA, Buckingham RO (1995) Robots in operating theatres. BMJ 311:1479–1482
 4. Chinzei K, Miller K (2001) Towards MRI-guided surgical manipulator. Med Sci Monit 7:153–163
 5. Davies B (2001) A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 214:129–140
 6. Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ et al (1989) A surgeon robot prostatectomy–a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol 13:273–277
 7. Dimaio SP, Pieper S, Chinzei K et al (2006) Robot-assisted needle placement in open-MRI: system architecture, integration and validation. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:126–131
 8. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G (2006) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 51:45–55
 9. Fichtinger G, Deweese TL, Patriciu A et al (2002) System for robotically assisted prostate biopsy and therapy with intraoperative CT guidance. Acad Radiol 9:60–74
Fichtinger G, Burdette EC, Tanacs A et al (2006) Robotically assisted prostate brachytherapy with transrectal ultrasound guidance–phantom experiments. Brachytherapy 5:14–26
Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q Et Al (1997) The Probot–an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 211:317–325
Ho G, Ng WS, Teo MY et al (2001) Experimental Study of transurethral robotic laser resection of the prostate using the Lasertrode Lightguide. J Biomed Opt 6:244–251
Janetschek G, Bartsch G, Kavoussi LR (1998) Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. J Urol 160:1413
Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R et al (2007) da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51:186–91
Lee BR, Bishoff JT, Janetschek G et al (1998) A novel method of surgical instruction: international telementoring. World J Urol 16:367–370
Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L et al (2000) Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29:665–668
Link RE, Schulam PG, Kavoussi LR (2001) Telesurgery: remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy. Urol Clin North Am 28:177–188
Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380
Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F et al (2002) Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg 235:487–492
Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B et al (2002) Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute Experience. Urology 60:864–868
Moinzadeh A, Gill IS (2004) Robotic adrenalectomy. Urol Clin North Am 31:753–756
Muntener M, Ursu D, Patriciu A et al (2006) Robotic prostate surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 3:575–584
Nag S, Beyer D, Friedland J et al (1999) American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:789–799
Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Al Zahrani H et al (2004) Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 64:919–924
Nathoo N, Cavusoglu MC, Vogelbaum MA et al (2005) In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future. Neurosurgery 56:421–433
Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM (2004) Computer-assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol 171:2629–2631
Olsen LH, Deding D, Yeung CK et al (2003) Computer assisted laparoscopic pneumovesical ureter reimplantation a.m. Cohen: initial experience in a pig model. Apmis Suppl 109:23–25
Rassweiler J, Binder J, Frede T (2001) Robotics and telesurgery: will they change our future? Curr Opin Urol 11:309–320
Rassweiler J, Safi KC, Subotic S et al (2005) Robotics and telesurgery–an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:109–122
Razdan S, Bagley DH, Mcginnis DE (2005) Minimizing minimally invasive surgery: the 5-mm trocar laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 19:533–536
Rovetta A (1999) Tests on reliability of a prostate biopsy telerobotic system. Stud Health Technol Inform 62:302–307
Rovetta A, Sala R (1995) Execution of robot-assisted biopsies within the clinical context. J Image Guid Surg 1:280–287
Sala LG, Matsunaga GS, Corica FA et al (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and totally intracorporeal ileal neobladder. J Endourol 20:233–235
Satava RM (1999) Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg 134:1197–1202
Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M (2004) Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol 171:1720–1725
Su LM, Stoianovici D, Jarrett TW et al (2002) Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access. J Endourol 16:471–475
Varkarakis IM, Rais-Bahrami S, Kavoussi LR et al (2005) Robotic surgery and telesurgery in urology. Urology 65:840–846
Wagner AA, Varkarakis IM, Link RE et al (2006) Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study. Urology 68:70–74
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rawashdeh, Y., Olsen, H. (2008). Telesurgery in Urology. In: Kumar, S., Marescaux, J. (eds) Telesurgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72999-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72999-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72998-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72999-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)