Skip to main content

Designing Efficient Evolutionary Algorithms for Cluster Optimization: A Study on Locality

  • Chapter
Advances in Metaheuristics for Hard Optimization

Part of the book series: Natural Computing Series ((NCS))

Abstract

Cluster geometry optimization is an important problem from the Chemistry area. Hybrid approaches combining evolutionary algorithms and gradient-driven local search methods are one of the most efficient techniques to perform a meaningful exploration of the solution space to ensure the discovery of low energy geometries. Here we performa comprehensive study on the locality properties of this approach to gain insight to the algorithm’s strengths andweaknesses.Theanalysis is accomplished through the application of several static measures to randomly generated solutions in order to establish the main properties of an extended set of mutation and crossover operators. Locality analysis is complemented with additional results obtained from optimization runs. The combination of the outcomes allows us to propose a robust hybrid algorithm that is able to quickly discover the arrangement of the cluster’s particles that correspond to optimal or near-optimal solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. E. Jones. On the Determination of Molecular Fields. II. From the Equation of State of a Gas. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 106, 463–477, 1924

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. E. Lennard-Jones. Cohesion. Proc. Phys. Soc., 43, 461–482, 1931

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Morse. Diatomic Molecules According to the Wave Mechanics. II. Vibrational Levels. Phys. Rev., 34, 57–64, 1929

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. K. Doye, R. Leary, M. Locatelli and F. Schoen. Global Optimization of Morse Clusters by Potential Energy Transformations, Informs Journal on Computing, 16, 371–379, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. L. Johnston. Evolving Better Nanoparticles: Genetic Algorithms for Optimising Cluster Geometries, Dalton Transactions, 22, 4193–4207, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. M. Deaven and K. Ho. Molecular Geometry Optimization with a Genetic Algorithm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 288–291, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Hartke. Global Geometry Optimization of Atomic and molecular Clusters by Genetic Algorithms, In L. Spector et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), 1284–1291

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Hartke. Application of Evolutionary Algorithms to Global Cluster Geometry Optimization, In R. L. Johnston (Ed.), Applications of Evolutionary Computation in Chemistry, Structure and Bonding, 110, 33–53, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Manby, R. L. Johnston and C. Roberts. Predatory Genetic Algorithms. Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 38, 111–122, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Pullan. An Unbiased Population-Based Search for the Geometry Optimization of Lennard-Jones Clusters: 2≤N≤372. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 6(9), 899–906, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Roberts, R. L. Johnston and N. Wilson (2000). A Genetic Algorithm for the Structural Optimization of Morse Clusters. Theor. Chem. Acc., 104, 123–130, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Zeiri. Prediction of the Lowest Energy Structure of Clusters Using a Genetic Algorithm, Phys. Rev., 51, 2769–2772, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Gottlieb and C. Eckert. A Comparison of Two Representations for the Fixed Charge Transportation Problem, In M. Schoenauer et al. (Eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VI), 345–354, Spinger-Verlag LNCS, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Gottlieb and G. Raidl. Characterizing Locality in Decoder-Based EAs for the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem, In C. Fonlupt et al. (Eds.), Artificial Evolution: Fourth European Conference, 38–52, Springer-Verlag LNCS, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Raidl and J. Gottlieb. Empirical Analysis of Locality, Heritability and Heuristic Bias in Evolutionary Algorithms: A Case Study for the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem. Evolutionary Computation, 13(4), 441–475, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Rothlauf and D. Goldberg, Prüfernumbers and Genetic Algorithms: A Lesson on Hoe the Low Locality on an Encoding Can Harm the Performance of Gas, In M. Schoeneauer et al. (Eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI, 395–404, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Rothlauf. On the Locality of Representations, In E. Cantú-Paz et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2003), Part II, 1608–1609, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Sendhoff, M. Kreutz and W. Seelen. A Condition for the Genotype-Phenotype Mapping: Causality. In T. Bäck (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA-97), 73–80, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. B. Pereira, J. M. C. Marques, T. Leitão, J. Tavares. Analysis of Locality in Hybrid Evolutionary Cluster Optimization. In G. Yen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2006), pp. 8049–8056, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. P. K. Doye and D. J. Wales. Structural Consequences of the Range of the Interatomic Potential. A Menagerie of Clusters. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 93, 4233–4243, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. J. Wales et al. The Cambridge Cluster Database, URL: http://www-wales.ch.cam.ac.uk/CCD.html, accessed on January 2007

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal. On the Limited Memory Method for Large Scale Optimization, Mathematical Programming B, 45, 503–528, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Nocedal. Large Scale Unconstrained Optimization, In A. Watson and I. Duff (Eds.), The State of the Art in Numerical Analysis, 311–338, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Wright. The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Genetics, Vol. 1, 356–366, 1932

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Jones and S. Forrest. Fitness Distance Correlation as a Measure of Problem Difficulty for Genetic Algorithms. In L. Eshelman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA-95), 184–192, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Merz. Memetic Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems: Fitness Landscapes and Effective Search Strategies. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Siegen, Germany, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. D. Weinberger. Correlated and Uncorrelated Fitness Landscapes and How to Tell the Difference, Biological Cybernetics, 63, 325–336, 1990

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. W. Hart, T. Kammeyer, R. Belew. The Role of Development in Genetic Algorithms. In D. Whitley and M. Vose, (Eds.), Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 3, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 315–332, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. Thierens, D. Goldberg. Mixing in Genetic Algorithms. In S. Forrest (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA-93), Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 38–45, 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pereira, F., Marques, J., Leitão, T., Tavares, J. (2007). Designing Efficient Evolutionary Algorithms for Cluster Optimization: A Study on Locality. In: Siarry, P., Michalewicz, Z. (eds) Advances in Metaheuristics for Hard Optimization. Natural Computing Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72960-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72960-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72959-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72960-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics