Advertisement

The gravitational lenses of Alpha Centauri A, B, C and of Barnard’s Star

Part of the Springer Praxis Books book series (PRAXIS)

Abstract

The gravitational lenses of the three nearest stars, Alpha Centauri A, B, and C (Proxima Centauri), are studied in this chapter. For each star, the minimal focal distance is found, and turns out to equal 679.262 AU, 563.484 AU and 112.138 AU, respectively, plus or minus the (large) uncertainties deriving from the uncertainties in the estimates of the star masses and radii. A comparison of these three minimal focal distances against the corresponding value for the Sun (550 AU, or, more correctly, 548.214 AU) is then made, but it is clearly pointed out that all these minimal focal distances are just the theoretical values given by Einstein’s deflection formula for a corresponding “naked star” (i.e., a star as if it had no corona!). The study of the true focal distances that follow from taking the corona into account is much more difficult and uncertain, and has to be delayed for further research. For the naked stars, we study the deflection of radio waves for four different frequencies: the water maser at 22 GHz, NASA’s Interstellar Probe (ISP) telecommunication frequency at 32 GHz (Ka band), the Cosmic Microwave Background peak frequency at 160.378 GHz and finally the positronium frequency at 203 GHz. For each frequency the antenna patterns of the three naked stars’ gravitational lenses are given. Finally, all the above data are derived also for the fourth star in increasing distance from the Sun—Barnard’s Star.

Keywords

Radio Wave Cosmic Microwave Background Star Mass Antenna Pattern Gravitational Lens 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    V. Eshleman, “Gravitational Lens of the Sun: Its Potential for Observations and Communications over Interstellar Distances,” Science, 205 (1979), 1133–1135.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Maccone, “Space Missions outside the Solar System to Exploit the Gravitational Lens of the Sun,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Space Missions and Astrodynamics, held in Turin, Italy, June 18, 1992, C. Maccone (editor), Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 47 (1994), 45–52.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Maccone, “The Gravitational Lenses of Alpha Centauri A, B, C and of Barnard’s Star,” Acta Astronautica, 47 (2000), 885–897.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    B. G. Andersson, and Slava G. Turyshe V, “550 AU Mission: Science Rationale, Goals and Requirements,” unpublished JPL internal report dated April 10, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. C. Ohanian, “On the Focusing of Gravitational Radiation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 9 (1974), 425–37.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Herlt, and H. Stephani, “Diffraction of a Plane Electromagnetic Wave at a Schwarzschild Black Hole,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 12 (1975), 81–93.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. Herlt, and H. Stephani, “Wave Optics of the Spherical Gravitational Lens. Part 1: Diffraction of a Plane Electromagnetic Wave by a Large Star,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 15 (1976), 45–65.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. L. West, “Design Issues for a Mission to Exploit the Gravitational Lens of the Sun at 550 AU,” Acta Astronautica, 44 (1999), 99–107.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    JPL’s DAstCom (= Data on Asteroids and Comets) database, included in the “MAnE” (= Mission Analysis Environment) package for mission design.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Maccone, “Cosmic Microwave Background and Gravitational Lens of the Sun,” Acta Astronautica, 46 (2000), 605–614.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. B. Guenther, and P. Demarque, “± Centauri A B”, Astrophysical Journal, 531 (2000), 503–520.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. F. Benedict, B. McArthur, E. Nelan, D. Story, A. L. Whipple, P. J. Shelus, W. H. Jeffreys, D. Hemenway, O. G. Franz, L. H. Wasserman et al., “Photometry of Proxima Centauri and Barnard’s Star Using Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor 3: A Search for Periodic Variations,” Astronomical Journal, 116 (1998), 429–439, see in particular Tables 1 and 2.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK 2009

Personalised recommendations