Skip to main content

Bridging Organizational Structure and Information System Architecture Through Process

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4537))

Abstract

Because the architecture of an enterprise information system determines relations of its individual parts with its surrounding environment, an effective use of an information system (IS) requires, apart from other things, its painless integration into the enterprise management system. The IS architecture can be seen by different angles. The focus of this paper is in particular on the application architecture of an IS. The reason for analyzing organizational structure modeling approaches and IS architecture is to eliminate common semantic gaps between the languages used by IS users and designers. The architectural design of enterprise IS might be tightly interconnected with enterprise organizational architecture. However, in reality, architectural models of enterprise IS are not fairly understandable for users. For both of these architectural models the orientation on processes often is a joint base. Thus, process approach can prospectively bridge existing gaps between enterprise organizational models and IS architectures. In coherence with that goal the paper presents methodological aspects of how cross-organizational process support can be effectively used for designing the first stage of information system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, S., Baldwin, A., Li, B., Waskett, P.: Analytical Design Planning Technique (ADePT). A Dependency Structure Matrix Tool to Schedule the Building Design Process. Construction Management and Economics 2, 173–182 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brickley, J.A., Smith, C.W., Zimmerman, J.: Managerial Economics & Organizational architecture. Mc Graw-Hill/ Irwin, New York, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castro, J., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J.: Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering. The Tropos project. Information Systems 6, 365–389 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crowe, T.J., Fong, P.M., Bauman, T.A., Zayas-Castro, J.L: Quantitative Risk Level Eestimation of Business Process Reengineering Efforts. Business Process Management Journal 5, 490–511 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davenport, T.H., Stoddard, D.B.: Reengineering: business change of mythic proportions? MIS Quarterly. June, 121-127 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flinchbaugh, J.: Using Integrated Management Systems to Design a Lean Factor. Center for Quality of Management Journal 2, 23–30 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grant, D.: A wider view of business process reengineering. Communications of the ACM 2, 85–90 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldkuhl, G., Röstlinger, A.: Towards an integral understanding of organizations and information systems: Convergence of three theories. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Organizational Semiotics, Delft (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hess, T., Oesterle, H.: Methods for Business Process Redesign: Current State and Development Perspectives. Business Change and Reengineering 2, 73–83 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kosanke, K., Zelm, M.: CIMOSA modeling processes. Computers in Industry 2(3), 141–153 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, T.H., Walden, D.: Designing Integrated Management Systems. Center for Quality of Management Journal 1, 3–18 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lind, M.: Contextual Understanding of Information Systems – Characteristics of Process Oriented Information Systems. In: Campbell B., Underwood J., Bunker, D. (eds.) Proceeding of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2005), University of Technology, Sydney (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maull, R.S., Tranfield, D.R., Maull, W.: Factors Characterizing the Maturity of BPR Programmes. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 6, 59 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marash, S.A.: A Process Approach to ISO 9001: Quality Digest (2000), Retrieved January 20, 2000, from http://www.qualitydigest.com/Oct00/html/marash.html

  15. Modrák, V.: Evaluation of Structural Properties for Business Processes. In: Sixt International Conference of Enterprise Information Systems: ICEIS, - Proceedings, Universidade Portucalense, Portugal. Porto, 2004, pp. 619–622 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Modrák, V.: Business Process Improvement through Optimization of its Structural Properties. In: Fischer, L. (ed.) Workflow Handbook, Future Strategies, Book Division Lighthouse Point, FL, USA, 2005, pp. 75–90 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Österle, H.: Business in the Information Age – Heading for New Processes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Neill, P., Sohal, A.S.: Business Process Reengineering: Application and Success-an Australian study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 9(10), 832–864 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsiao R.: Why IT-enabled Change Fail. Working Paper of the National University of Singapore (2007). Retrieved, January 2007, from http://school.nus.edu.sg/Research/paperseries.htm

  20. Vasconcelos, A., Sousa, P., Tribolet, J.: Information System Architecture Evaluation: From Software to Enterprise Level Approaches. In: 12th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation (ECITE 2005), Turku, Finland September (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 3, 276–292 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang Wei Wang Lei Chen Clarence A. Ellis Ching-Hsien Hsu Ah Chung Tsoi Haixun Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Modrák, V. (2007). Bridging Organizational Structure and Information System Architecture Through Process. In: Chang, K.CC., et al. Advances in Web and Network Technologies, and Information Management. APWeb WAIM 2007 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4537. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72909-9_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72909-9_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72908-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72909-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics