Abstract
The following note reviews some of the potential issues facing the group in their negotiations. It may provide a starting point for the negotiation. The financial expert, also called mediator in this note, does not, at this point in time, exclude from consideration any reasonable arguments in supporting an individual country’s position. The starting point for the negotiations is the ‘Agreement on Succession Issues’ signed by all five successor States of the former SFRY.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aldrich, George H. (1996): “The Jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal”, Oxford University Press.
American Arbitration Association (AAA) website: www.adr.org.
Czaplinski, Wladyslaw (1999): “Equity and equitable principles in the law of state succession”, in Succession of States, ed. by Mojmir Mrak, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, London, Boston.
Circuvic, Milutin and Srboljub Jovic (1985): “Savings of Households in Yugoslavia”, in Financial and Banking System of Yugoslavia, ed. Milutin Circovic and Negoslav Ostojic, Research Centre for Cooperation with Developing Countries, RCCDC, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia.
Council of Europe, Minutes of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, Strasbourg, 24 January 2000.
Drummond, Paolo (2000): “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Banking Soundness and Recent Lessons”. IMF, Working Paper/00/145.
Economic Commission for Europe (UN): “Economic Survey of Europe”, 2001, No. 1 (pp. 97–101 “Reforming Yugoslavia’s economy”).
European Commission (2000): “Slovenia’s progress towards accession (Slovenia 2000)”, 8 November 2000 (http://europa.eu.int/comm/engargement).
Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina (2000), Decision on admissibility and merits, Case nos. CH/97/48, CH/97/52.CH/97/105, and CH/97/108 Milovan POROPAT, Senija POROPAT, Murdifa SEREMET, and Muhamed HRELJA against BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA and the FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (9 June 2000); (www.gwde.de/∼ujvr/ hrch/0000-0999/0048).
IMF, Country Report 01/50 on the Republic of Croatia (March 2001).
IMF, Country Report 01/76 on the Republic of Slovenia (May 2001).
IMF, Country Report 01/93 on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (June 2001).
IMF, Country Report 01/106 on Bosnia and Herzegovina (July 2001).
IMF, Country Report 01/07 on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: Membership and Request for Emergency Postconflict Assistance – Staff Report, and Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion (January 2001).
IMF: “Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions”, Several Annual Reports.
Kapstein, Ethan B. (1992): “Between power and purpose: central bankers and the politics of regulatory convergence”, International Organisation 46, 1, winter 1992.
Kapstein, Ethan B. (1994): “Governing the Global Economy, International Finance and the State”, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, London.
Kaufman, Georg G. and Steven A. Seelig (2001): “Post-Resolution Treatment of Depositors at Failed Banks: Implications for the Severity of Banking Crises, Systemic Risk and Too-Big-To-Fail”, IMF, Working Paper/01/83 IMF Country Report 01/76 on the Republic of Slovenia (May).
Mrak, Mojmir (1999): “Apportionment and Succession of External Debts: The case of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia”, Research Reports No. 259, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (WIIW), August.
Petrakos, George (2001): “Fragmentation or Integration in the Balkans? Strategies of Development for the 21st Century” in The Development of the Balkan Region, ed. By George Petrakos and Stoyan Totev, Ashgate.
Petrovic, Pavle, Zeljko Bogetic and Zorica Vujosevic (1999): “The Yugoslav Hyperinflation of 19921994: Causes, Dynamics, and Money Supply Process”, Journal of Comparative Economics 27, pp. 335–353.
Staniè, Ana (2001): “Financial Aspects of State Succession: The Case of Yugoslavia”, EJIL, Vol. 12 No. 4. pp. 751–779.
Submissions received by Dr. Hans Meyer: Bosnia and Herzegovina (28 September 2001), Republic of Croatia (24 October 2001), Republic of Macedonia (28 September 2001), Republic of Slovenia (28 September 2001), Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (26 October 2001).
Trifkoviæ, Miloš (1999): “Fundamental controversies in succession to the former SFR Yugoslavia”, in Succession of States ed. by Mojmir Mrak, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, London, Boston.
White, William R. (1999): “Evolving International Financial Markets: Some Implications for Central Banks”, BIS Working Papers, No. 66, April, (www.bis.org).
World Bank (2001): “Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: Breaking with the Past: The path to stability and growth”, Volume I: The Economic, Social and Institutional Reform Agenda.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). The successor states of the former Yugoslavia – mediation under Art. 7, Annex C of the Vienna Agreement on Succession Issues – a major review. In: Challenges at the Bank for International Settlements. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72790-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72790-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72789-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72790-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)