For many years, gadolinium based contrast agents have been considered quite safe, with minimal associated risk. However, gadolinium based contrast agents are not inert drugs. They may cause acute non-renal adverse reactions (e.g. anaphylactoid reactions), acute renal adverse reactions (e.g. contrast induced nephropathy), delayed adverse reactions (nephrogenic systemic fibrosis), problems at the site of injection (e.g. local necrosis) and laboratory abnormalities. The use of contrast enhanced MRI has increased over the past decade, as a variety of new applications have been described and put into clinical practice. Consequently, the number of administrations of gadolinium based contrast agents have also increased considerably. This chapter focuses on acute adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast agents which are similar to reactions which occur after iodine based contrast media. Delayed adverse reactions, extravasation and laboratory abnormalities are covered in Chaps 24, 15 and 14, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balzer JO, Loewe C, Davis K et al (2003) Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material. Eur Radiol 13:2067–2074
Bellin MF, Deray G, Assogba U et al (1992) Gd-DOTA: evaluation of its renal tolerance in patients with chronic renal failure. Magn Reson Imaging 10:115–118
Briguori C, Colombo A, Airoldi F, Melzi G et al (2006) Gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrotoxicity in patients undergoing coronary artery procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67:175–180
Brown JJ, Kristy RM, Stevens GR et al (2002) The OptiMARK clinical development program: summary of safety data. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:446–455
Demaerel P, Marchal G, Wilms G et al (1994) Gadodiamide injection at 0.1 and 0.3 mmol/kg body weight: a phase III double-blind, parallel, randomised clinical investigation of known or suspected central nervous system lesions at 1.5T. Neuroradiology 36:355–359
De Ridder F, de Maeseneer M, Stadnik T et al (2001) Severe adverse reactions with contrast agents for magnetic resonance: clinical experience in 30000 MR examinations. JBR-BTR 84:150–152
Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Strouse PJ, Jan SC (2007) Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing IV contrast media in children and adults. Am J Roentgenol 189:1533–1538
Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Strouse PJ, Jan SC (2008) Allergic-like breakthrough reactions to gadolinium contrast agents after corticosteroid and antihistamine premedication. Am J Roentgenol 190:187–190
Elmståhl B, Leander P, Grant D et al (2007) Histomorphological changes after renal X-ray arteriography using iodine and gadolinium contrast media in an ischemic porcine model. Acta Radiol 23:1–11
Elmståhl B, Nyman U, Leander P, Chai CM, Frennby B, Almen T (2004) Gadolinium contrast media are more nephrotoxic than a low-osmolar iodine medium employing doses with equal X-ray attenuation in renal arteriography: an experimental study in pigs. Acad Radiol 11:1219–1228
Ergun I, Keven K, Uruc I et al (2006) The safety of gadolinium in patients with stage 3 and 4 renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:697–700
Greenen RWF, Krestin GP (2006) Non-tissue specific extracellular MR contrast media. In: Thomsen HS (ed). Contrast media: Safety issues and ESUR Guidelines. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 107–120
Herborn CU, Honold E, Wolf M et al (2007) Clinical safety and diagnostic value of the gadolinium chelate gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA). Invest Radiol 42:58–62
Haustein J, Laniado M, Niendorf HP et al (1993) Triple-dose versus standard-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: a randomized study in 199 patients. Radiology 186:855–860
Joffe P, Thomsen HS, Meusel M (1998) Pharmacokinetics of gadodiamide injection in patients with severe renal insufficiency and patients undergoing hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Acad Radiol 5:491–502
Kirchin MA, Runge VM (2003) Contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Safety update. Top Magn Reson Imaging 14:426–435
Li A, Wong CS, Wong MK, Lee CM, Au Yeung MC (2006) Acute adverse reactions to magnetic resonance contrast media: gadolinium chelates. Br J Radiol 79:368–371
Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA, Cohen RH (1996) Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases. Am J Roentgenol 167:847–849
Murphy KPJ, Szopinski KT, Cohan RH, Mermillod B, Ellis JH (1999) Occurrence of adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast material and management of patients at increased risk: a survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Fellowship Directors. Acad Radiol 6:656–664
Niendorf HP, Dinger JC, Haustein J et al (1991a) Tolerance data of Gd-DTPA: a review. Eur J Radiol 13:15–20
Niendorf H P, Haustein J, Cornelius I, Alhassan A, Clauss W (1991b). Safety of gadolinium-DTPA: extended clinical experience. Magn Reson Med 22:222–228
Oudkerk M, Sijens PE, van Beek EJR et al (1995) Safety and efficacy of Gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) versus Magnevist (Gd-DTPA) in magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system. Invest Radiol 30:75–78
Runge VM (2000) Safety of approved MR contrast media for intravenous injection. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:205–213
Sam II AD, Morasch MD, Collins J, Song G, Chen R, Pereles FS (2003) Safety of gadolinium contrast angiography in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 38:313–318
Shellock FG, Kanal E (1999) Safety of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:477–484
Swan SK, Baker JF, Free R, Tucker RM et al (1999a) Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of gadoversetamide injection (OptiMARK) in subjects with central nervous system or liver pathology and varying degrees of renal function. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:317–321
Swan SK, Lambrecht LJ, Townsend R, Davies et al (1999b) Safety and pharmacokinetic profile of gadobenate dimeglumine in subjects with renal impairment. Invest Radiol 34:443–448
Thomsen HS (1997) Frequency of acute adverse events to a nonionic lowosmolar contrast medium: the effect of verbal interview. Pharmacol Toxicol 80:108–110
Thomsen HS (2004) Gadolinium-based contrast media may be nephrotoxic even at approved doses (case report). Eur Radiol 14:1654–1656
Thomsen HS, Almén T, Morcos SK, Members of Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (2002) Gadolinium-containing contrast media for radiographic examinations: a position paper. Eur Radiol 12:2600–2605
Thurnher SA, Capelastagui A, del Olmo FH et al (2001) Safety and effectiveness of single- versus triple-dose gadodiamide injection-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen: a phase III double-blind multicenter study. Radiology 219:137–146
Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P et al (2001) Renal tolerance of a neutral gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) in patients with chronic renal failure: results of a randomized study. Radiology 218:651–657
Tresley RM, Stone LA, Fields N et al (1997) Clinical safety of serial monthly administrations of gadopentetate dimeglumine in patients with multiple sclerosis: implications for natural history and early-phase treatment trials. Neurology 48:832–835
Yoshikawa K, Davies A (1997) Safety of ProHance in special populations. Eur Radiol 7(Suppl 5):S246–S250
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heinz-Peer, G. (2009). Acute Adverse Reactions. In: Thomsen, H.S., Webb, J.A.W. (eds) Contrast Media. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72784-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72784-2_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72783-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72784-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)