Skip to main content

Creating a Fuzzy Believer to Model Human Newspaper Readers

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4509))

Abstract

We present a system capable of modeling human newspaper readers. It is based on the extraction of reported speech, which is subsequently converted into a fuzzy theory-based representation of single statements. A domain analysis then assigns statements to topics. A number of fuzzy set operators, including fuzzy belief revision, are applied to model different belief strategies. At the end, our system holds certain beliefs while rejecting others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballim, A., Wilks, Y.: Artificial Believers: The Ascription of Belief. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., Tablan, V.: GATE: A framework and graphical development environment for robust NLP tools and applications. In: Proc. of the 40th Anniversary Meeting of the ACL (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergler, S.: Conveying attitude with reported speech. In: Shanahan, J.C., Qu, Y., Wiebe, J. (eds.) Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergler, S., Doandes, M., Gerard, C., Witte, R.: Attributions. In: Qu, Y., Shanahan, J., Wiebe, J. (eds.): Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications, Stanford, California, USA, March 22–25, 2004, Technical Report SS-04-07, pp. 16-19. AAAI Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Witte, R., Bergler, S.: Fuzzy Coreference Resolution for Summarization. In: Proc. of 2003 Intl. Symposium on Reference Resolution and Its Applications to Question Answering and Summarization (ARQAS), Venice, Italy, June 23–24 2003, pp. 43–50 (2003), http://rene-witte.net

  6. Gerard, C.: Modelling Readers Of News Articles Using Nested Beliefs. Master’s thesis, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Quirk, R.: A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman Group Limited, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bergler, S.: The Evidential Analysis of Reported Speech. PhD thesis, Brandeis University, Massachusetts, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Briscoe, E., Carroll, J., Watson, R.: The Second Release of the RASP System. In: Proc. of the COLING/ACL 2006 Interactive Presentation Sessions (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, D.: Dependency Based Evaluation of MINIPAR. In: Proc. of the Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems, First Intl. Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (1998), http://www.ai.uga.edu/mc/dparser/dgpacmnew.pdf

  11. Gaizauskas, R., Hepple, M., Saggion, H., Greenwood, M.A., Humphreys, K.: SUPPLE: A practical parser for natural language engineering applications. In: Proc. of the 9th Intl. Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT2005), Vancouver (2005), www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/intranet/research/resmes/CS0508.pdf

  12. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Witte, R.: Architektur von Fuzzy-Informationssystemen. BoD, Norderstedt (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Witte, R.: Fuzzy Belief Revision. In: 9th Intl. Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR’02), Toulouse, France, April 19–21, 2002, pp. 311–320 (2002), http://rene-witte.net

  15. Dolan, B., Brockett, C., Quirk, C.: Mirosoft research paraphrase corpus (March 2005), Online: http://research.microsoft.com/research/nlp/msr_paraphrase.htm

  16. Bar-Haim, R., Dagan, I., Dolan, B., Ferro, L., Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Szpektor, I.: The Second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In: Proc. of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bethard, S., Yu, H., Thornton, A., Hatzivassiloglou, V., Jurafsky, D.: Automatic extraction of opinion propositions and their holders. In: Qu, Y., Shanahan, J., Wiebe, J. (eds.): Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications, Stanford, California, USA, March 22–25, 2004, Technical Report SS-04-07, pp. 20–27. AAAI Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gamon, M., Aue, A., Corston-Oliver, S., Ringger, E.K.: Pulse: Mining customer opinions from free text. In: Famili, A.F., Kok, J.N., Peña, J.M., Siebes, A., Feelders, A. (eds.) IDA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3646, pp. 121–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, S.M., Hovy, E.: Identifying and analyzing judgment opinions. In: Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, New York City, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2006, pp. 200–207 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B.: The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In: Proc. of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Snow, R., Vanderwende, L., Menezes, A.: Effectively using syntax for recognizing false entailment. In: Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, New York City, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2006, pp. 33–40 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. MacCartney, B., Grenager, T., de Marneffe, M.C., Cer, D., Manning, C.D.: Learning to recognize features of valid textual entailments. In: Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, New York City, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2006, pp. 41–48 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klebanov, B.B.: Measuring Semantic Relatedness Using People and WordNet. In: Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, New York City, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Doandes, M.: Profiling For Belief Acquisition From Reported Speech. Master’s thesis, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qu, Y., Shanahan, J., Wiebe, J. (eds.): Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications, Stanford, California, USA, March 22–25, 2004, Technical Report SS-04-07, AAAI Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, New York City, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ziad Kobti Dan Wu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krestel, R., Witte, R., Bergler, S. (2007). Creating a Fuzzy Believer to Model Human Newspaper Readers. In: Kobti, Z., Wu, D. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4509. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72665-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72665-4_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72664-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72665-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics