Skip to main content

Towards Content-Aware Coding: User Study

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4471))

Abstract

Developing a content-aware coding scheme that delivers ensured QoE for end-users includes finding out which content information will be most needed; especially when wireless networks are used to send video information. Wireless in-home networks suffer from interference which creates variable throughput, which causes problems when sending video material from one device to another. Temporal and quality scaling provide classes for video adaptation methods that can handle this variable throughput. Presented research concerns the effect of temporal scaling versus quality scaling on different kinds of video content. We looked at the difference in perceived video quality between I-Frame Delay (temporal scaling) and TransCoding (quality scaling). Results show that I-Frame Delay scored better for video content without a lot of background movement, while TransCoding was scored better for scenes with lot of background movement. There are also indications that information about scene changes can be helpful to create content-aware coding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldridge, R., Ghanbari, M.: Bursty error model for digital transmission channels. Electronics Letters 31, 2144–2145 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siller, M., Woods, J.C.: QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission, 238-241 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tripathi, A., Claypool, M.: Improving Multimedia Streaming with Content-Aware Video Scaling. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Intelligent Multimedia Computing and Networking (IMMCN) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yuen, M., Wu, H.R.: A survey of hybrid MC/DPCM/DCT video coding distortions. Signal Processing 70, 247–278 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Meesters, L.M.J., Martens, J.-B.: Influence of processing method, bit-rate, and scene content on perceived and predicted image quality. In: Proceedings of SPIE 3959, pp. 45–55 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seyler, A., Budrikis, Z.: Detail perception after scene changes in television image presentations. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 11, 31–43 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jae, C.K., Jae-kyoon, K., Woongshik, Y.: Adaptive video coding rate control for better perceived picture quality in time-varying channels. 2, 521-525 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, D., et al.: Toward optimal rate control: a study of the impact of spatial resolution, frame rate, and quantization on subjective video quality and bit rate. 5150, 198-209 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy, J.D., Sasse, A., Miras, D.: Sharp or smooth?: comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video. In: CHI 2004, pp. 535–542 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hauske, G., Stockhammer, T., Hofmaier, R.: Subjective image quality of low-rate and low-resolution video sequences, 1-6 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haakma, R., Jarnikov, D., van der Stok, P.: Perceived quality of wirelessly transported videos. 1st, 213-239 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van den Ende, N., Haakma, R., Meesters, L.M.J.: Effect of MPEG-2 Compression Parameters on Perceived Video Image Quality. In: Society for Information Display, International Symposium, Seminar and Exhibition (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kozlov, S., van der Stok, P., Lukkien, J.: Adaptive scheduling of MPEG video frames during real-time wireless video streaming. In: Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM’05) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brouwers, C.J.J.: A real-time SNR scalable transcoder for MPEG-2 video streams. Eindhoven University of Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Masry, M., et al.: Subjective quality evaluation of low-bit-rate video. 4299, 102-113 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zink, M., et al.: Subjective impression of variations in layer encoded videos, 137-154 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hands, D.S., Avons, S.E.: Recency and duration neglect in subjective assessment of television picture quality. Applied Cognitive Psychology 15, 639–657 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Hesselle, H.: Toolkit for perception experiments: development, implementation and evaluation. Eindhoven University of Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thurstone, L.L.: A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review 34, 273–286 (1927)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boschman, M.C.: DifScal: A tool for analyzing difference ratins on an ordinal category scale. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 33, 10–20 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pablo Cesar Konstantinos Chorianopoulos Jens F. Jensen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van den Ende, N., de Hesselle, H., Meesters, L. (2007). Towards Content-Aware Coding: User Study. In: Cesar, P., Chorianopoulos, K., Jensen, J.F. (eds) Interactive TV: a Shared Experience. EuroITV 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4471. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72559-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72559-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72558-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72559-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics