Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Species Diversity of Browsing and Grazing Ungulates: Consequences for the Structure and Abundance of Secondary Production

  • Chapter
The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 195))

There are two fundamentally different ways to look on the way consumers use their resources. The first is that different species partition the resource in a particular manner, so that some species get a particular part and other species another part. In this view, the sum of the shares is equal to the total. The second way of looking at resource partitioning is shaped by thoughts about niche differentiation: species differ in their ability to extract particular resources from a continuum, and because they are different there is an additive effect if different species utilise an area together. Specialization leads to increased partitioning of resources which leads to a higher total offtake. We are interested in the question, then, whether increased species richness of vertebrates that make use of the vegetation—that is, ungulate grazers and browsers—leads to an increased offtake of the plant biomass in an area, and subsequently whether, if true, this translates into higher herbivore biomass and/or productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abaye AO, Allen VG, Fontenot JP (1994). Influencing of grazing cattle and sheep together and separately on animal performance and forage quality. J Anim Sci 72:1013–1022.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo Filho JA de, Gadelha JA, Viana OJ (1982) Complementary grazing by cattle, sheep and goat on the “Caatinga” of northeast Brazil. Proc Third International Conference on Goat Production and Disease, Dairy Goat Journal Pub Co, Scottsdale, AZ pp 532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo Filho, AJ de, Gadelha JA, Leite ER, Souza PZ, Crispim SMA, Rego MC (1996) Botanical and chemical composition of the diet of sheep and goats grazing together in the Inhamuns region, Ceara. Rev Soc Brasil Zootech 25:383–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucamp AJ (1976) The role of the browser in the bushveld of the Eastern Cape. Proc of the Grassland Soc Southern Afr 11:135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi S, Goyal SP, Sankar K (2003) Niche relationships of an ungulate assemblage in a dry tropical forest. J Mammal 84:981–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi S, Mishra C, Bhatnagar YC (2004) Conflicts between traditional pastoralism and conservation of Himalayan ibex (Capra sibirica) in the Trans-Himalayan mountains. Anim Conserv 7:121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond EM, Chase JM (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at local and regional spatial scales. Ecol Lett 5:467–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breebaart L, Brikraj R, O’Connor TG (2002) Dietary overlap between Boer goats and indigenous browsers in a South African savanna. Afr J Range Forage Sci 19:13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brelin B (1979) Mixed grazing with sheep and cattle compared with single grazing. Swed J Agr Res 9:113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Palmer MA, Collins SL (2002) Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation. Nature 415:426–429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark L (1980) Sheep and cattle on saltbush. Rural Res 107:13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuartas P, Gordon IJ, Hester AJ, Perez Barberia FJ, Hulbert IAR (2000) The effect of heather fragmentation and mixed grazing on the diet of sheep Ovis aries and red deer Cervus elaphus. Acta Theriol 45:309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming DHM (1993) Multispecies systems: progress, prospects and challenges in sustaining range animal production and biodiversity in East and southern Africa. Proceedings of the World Conference on Animal Production, Edmonton, Canada, vol 1, pp 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox-Ganser JM (1990) Comparative grazing behavior of cattle, goats and sheep. Thesis, West Virginia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer J, Hanekamp WJA (1992) Combined grazing system of yearling heifers and sheep. Rapport Proefstation voor de Rundveehouderij, Schapenhouderij en Paardenhouderij 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker B (1997) Calculating stocking rates for game ranches: substitution ratios for use in the Mopani Veld. Afr Jour Range Forage Sci 14:62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Pozo M, Osoro K, Celaya R (1998) The effects of complementary grazing by goats on sward composition and on sheep performance managed during lactation in perennial ryegrass and white clover pastures. Small Ruminant Res 29:173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit CT (1960) On competition. Landbouwpublicaties, Wageningen, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson IA, Frame J, Arnold DP (1981) Mixed grazing of sheep versus cattle only in an intensive grassland system. Anim Prod 33:265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson CH (1979) Goats and/or cattle on mopani veld. Proc Grassland Soc Southern Afr 14:119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Toit JT (1990) Feeding-height stratification among African browsing ruminants. Afr J Ecol 28:55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Toit JT, Bryant JP, Frisby K (1990) Regrowth and palatability of acacia shoots following pruning by African savanna browsers. Ecology 71:149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Toit JT, Cumming DHM (1999) Functional significance of ungulate diversity in African savannas and the ecological implications of the spread of pastoralism. Biodivers Conserv 8:1643–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Toit PCV, Blom CD, Immelman WF (1995) Diet selection by sheep and goats in the arid Karoo. Afr J Range Forage Sci 12:16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar A, Gonzalez JE (1976) Study on the competitive consumption of large herbivores of the flooded area of the Llanos with special reference to the capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris). Agron Trop 26:215–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt KAM, Kadlec JA (2001) Species traits, species richness and the resilience of wetlands after disturbance. J Aquat Plant Manage 39:36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt KAM, Ritchie ME (2002) The effects of aquatic plant species richness on wetland ecosystem processes. Ecology 83:2911–2924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CR (1972) The food habits of wild ungulates in Uganda by analyses of stomach contents. E Afr Wildl J 10:17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher GEJ, Scanlan S, Waterhouse A (1994) The ecology of sheep and goat grazing in semi-natural hill pastures of Scotland. In: ‘t Mannetje L, Frame J (eds) Grassland and society, Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, NL, pp 286–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • French NR (1985) Herbivore overlap and competition in Kenya rangeland. Afr J Ecol 23:259–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz H, Duncan P (1994) On the carrying capacity for large ungulates of African savanna ecosystems. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 256:77–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz H, Duncan P, Gordon J, Illius AW (2002) Megaherbivores influence trophic guilds structure in African ungulate communities. Oecologia 131:620–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz H, Loison A (2006) Large herbivores across biomes. In: Danell K, Bergström R, Duncan P, Pastor J (eds) Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallina, S (1993) White-tailed deer and cattle diets at La Michellia, Durango, Mexico. J Range Manage 46:487–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamfeldt L, Hillebrand H, Jonsson PR (2005) Species richness changes across two trophic levels simultaneously affect prey and consumer biomass. Ecol Lett 8:696–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genin D, Villca Z, Abasto P (1994) Diet selection and utilization by llama and sheep in high-altitude arid rangeland of Bolivia. J Range Manage 47:245–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogan PJP, Barrett RH (1995) Elk and deer diets in a coastal prairie-scrub mosaic, California. J Range Manage 48:327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IJ (2003) Browsing and grazing ruminants: are they the same beasts? Forest Ecol Manag 181:13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IJ, Illius AW (1994) The functional significance of the browser–grazer dichotomy in African ruminants. Oecologia 98:167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton D (1976) Performance of sheep and cattle grazing together in different ratios. Aust J Exp Agr Anim Husb 16:5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RM, Reid LD (1975) Diet overlap of deer, elk, and cattle in southern Colorado. J Range Manage 28:43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy MB, Tainton NM (1995) The effects of mixed species grazing on the performance of cattle and sheep in Highland Sourveld. Afr J Range Forage Sci 12:97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, JA (1986) Comparative dietary ecology of a community of frugivorous forest ungulates in Zaire. Thesis, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiremath AJ, Ewel JJ (2001) Ecosystem nutrient use efficiency, productivity, and nutrient accrual in model tropical communities. Ecosystems 4:669–682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak M, Loreau M (2006) Reconciling empirical ecology with neutral community models. Ecology 87:1370–1377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, RR (1973) The ruminant stomach: stomach structure and feeding habits of East African game ruminants. East African Literature Bureau, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard RE, Hansen RM (1976) Diets of wild horses, cattle, and mule deer in the Piceance basin, Colorado. J Range Manage 29:389–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman J, Olff H (1998) Competition and facilitation in multi-species plant–herbivore systems of productive environments. Ecol Lett 1:25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1957) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kind of animals? Am Nat 93:145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illius AW, Gordon IJ (1987) The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants. J Anim Ecol 56:989–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis CM, Damuth J, Theodor JM (2000) Miocene ungulates and terrestrial productivity: where have all the browsers gone? Proc Nat Acad USA 97:7899–7904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell PA (1980) Ecology and management of game animals and domestic livestock in African savannas. In: Human ecology in savanna environments. Academic Press, London, pp 353–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Morin PJ (2005) Predator diet breadth influences the relative importance of bottom-up and top-down control of prey biomass and diversity. Am Nat 165:350–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, McPeek MA (2006) Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology 87:1399–1410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leite ER, de Araujo Filho JA, Pinto FC (1995) Combined grazing with goats and sheep in lowered caatinga: performance of pasture and of animals. Pesqui Agropecu Brasil 30:1129–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot CJ, Posselt J (1977) Eland (Taurotragus oryx) as a ranching animal complementary to cattle in Rhodesia. 2. Habitat and diet selection. Rhod Agr J 74:53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan JL, Jennings PG, McLaren LE (1991) Mixed grazing of cattle and sheep. Proc VI World Red Poll Congress, Jamaica Agricultural Development Foundation, Kingston, pp 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long ZT, Morin PJ (2005) Effects of organism size and community composition on ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8:1271–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 95:5632–5636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausi P et al (2001) Ecology, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–808.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucich GC, Hansen RM (1981) Autumn mule deer foods on heavily grazed cattle ranges in northwestern Colorado. J Range Manage 34:72–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahieu M, Aumont G, Michaux Y et al (1997) Mixed grazing sheep/cattle on irrigated pastures in Martinique (FWI). Prod Anim 10:55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhabu SW (2005) Resource partitioning within a browsing guild in a key habitat, the Chobe riverfront, Botswana. J Trop Ecol 21:641–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez A, Osoro K, Lemaire G (2002) Yearling calves live weight gains and productivity under single or mixed spring grazing with goat or sheep. In: Durand JL, Emile JC, Huyghe C (eds) Multi-function grasslands: quality forages, animal products and landscapes. Proc 19th European Grassland Federation Meeting, Versailles, pp 1050–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Ruess RW, Seagle SW (1988) Large mammals and process dynamics in African ecosystems. Biosci 38:794–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellink E (1995) Use of Sonoran rangelands: lessons from the Pleistocene. In: Steadman DW, Mead JI (eds) Late quaternary environments and deep history: a tribute to Paul S. Martin. Mammoth Site of Hot Springs, Hot Springs, SD, pp 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard C, Duncan P, Fleurance G, Georges JY, Lila M (2002) Comparative foraging and nutrition of horses and cattle in European wetlands. J Appl Ecol 39:120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton SJ (2000) Theme: interactions between diversity and animal production in natural rangelands. Afr J Range Forage Sci 17:1–3, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra C (2001) High altitude survival: conflicts between pastoralism and wildlife in the Trans-Himalaya. Thesis, Wageningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TD (1985) Goats in land and pasture. In: Copland JW (ed) Goat production and research in the tropics. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, pp 115–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwasi SM (2002) Compressed nature: co-existing grazers in a small reserve in Kenya. Thesis, Wageningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A (2000) Diet overlap among ruminants in Fennoscandia. Oecologia 124:130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan T, Connolly J (1989) Mixed versus mono-grazing by steers and sheep. Anim Prod 48:519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan T Pulina G, Sikosana JLN, Connolly J (1999) Mixed animal type grazing research under temperate and semi-arid conditions. Outlook Agr 28:117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oindo B (2002) Patterns of herbivore species richness in Kenya and current ecoclimatic stability. Biodivers Conserv 11:1205–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oindo B, Skidmore AK, Prins HHT (2001) Body size and abundance relationship: an index for diversity for herbivores. Biodivers Conserv 10:1923–1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olff H, Ritchie ME, Prins HHT (2002) Global environmental controls of diversity in large herbivores. Nature 415:901–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olson KC, Wiedmeier RD, Browne JE, Hurst RL (1999) Livestock response to multispecies and deferred-rotation grazing on forested rangeland. J Range Manage 52:462–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osoro K, Martinez A, Celaya R, Vassalo JM (2000) The effects of mixed grazing with goats on performance of yearling calves in perennial ryegrass with clover pastures. In: Rook AJ, Penning PD (eds) Grazing management: the principles and practice of grazing, for profit and environmental gain, within temperate grassland systems. BBSRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Aberystwyth, UK, pp 115–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (1985) The ecological potential of the kudu for commercial production in savanna regions. J Grassland Soc Southern Afr 2:7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (1988) Megaherbivores. The influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfisterer AB, Schmidt B (2002) Diversity-dependent production can decrease the stability of ecosystem functioning. Nature 416:84–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pordomingo AJ, Rucci T (2000) Red deer and cattle diet composition in La Pampa, Argentina. J Range Manage 53:649–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prins HHT, de Boer WF, van Oeveren H, Correira A, Mafuca J, Olff H (2006) Co-existence and niche segregation of three small bovids in southern Mozambique. Afr J Ecol 44:186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prins HHT, Olff H (1998) Species richness of African grazer assemblages: towards a functional explanation. In: Newbery DM, Prins HHT, Brown ND (eds) Dynamics of tropical communities. BES Symp vol 37, Blackwell, Oxford, p 449–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins CT, Spalinger DE, Van Hoven W (1995) Adaptations of ruminants to browse and grass diets: are anatomical-based browser–grazer interpretations valid? Oecologia 103:208–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CC, Ellis JE (1981) Feeding ecology and niche separation in some native and domestic ungulates on the shortgrass prairie. J Appl Ecol 18:343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha R, Wegge P, Koirala RA (2005) Summer diets of wild and domestic ungulates in Nepal Himalaya. J Zool 266:111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storms D, Said S, Fritz H, Hamann J-L, Saint-Andrieux C, Klein F (2006) Influence of hurricane Lothar on red and roe deer winter diets in the northern Vosges, France. Forest Ecol Manag 237:164–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thill RE, Martin A (1986) Deer and cattle diet overlap on Louisiana pine–bluestem range. J Wildl Manage 50:707–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1999) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997) Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 94:1857–1861.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C (2001) Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294:843–845.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J, Lawrence D, Symstad A, Hobbie S (2002) Effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning in managed ecosystems. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wieren SE (1996) Do large herbivores select a diet that maximizes short term digestible energy intake? Forest Ecol Manag 88:149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voeten MM, Prins HHT (1999) Resource partitioning between sympatric wild and domestic herbivores in the Tarangire region of Tanzania. Oecologia 120:287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, ES (1987) Ecology in relation to speciation rates: some case histories of Miocene–recent mammal clades. Evol Ecol 1:283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AD, Mulham WE (1980) Vegetation changes and animal productivity under sheep and goat grazing on an arid belah (Casuarina cristata)–rosewood (Heterodendrum oleifolium) woodland in western New South Wales. Aust Rangeland J 2:183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yachi S, Loreau M (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:1463–1468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Herbert H. T. Prins

  2. Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS UPR 1934, 79360, Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France

    Hervé Fritz

Authors
  1. Herbert H. T. Prins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hervé Fritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. PMB PO Aitkenvale, Qld 4814, Australia

    Iain J. Gordon

  2. Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Herbert H. T. Prins

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prins, H.H.T., Fritz, H. (2008). Species Diversity of Browsing and Grazing Ungulates: Consequences for the Structure and Abundance of Secondary Production. In: Gordon, I.J., Prins, H.H.T. (eds) The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing. Ecological Studies, vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72422-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation