Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integration der Dopplersonographie in das klinische Management

  • Chapter
Dopplersonographie in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie

  • 763 Accesses

Auszug

Die Einführung einer neuen Methode wie die der Dopplersonographie (DS) in die Klinik läuft aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht optimalerweise in 3 Schritten ab:

  1. 1.

    Zunächst muss sichergestellt werden, dass eine klinisch interessierende Messung wie das Blutströmungsverhalten im fetomaternalen Gefäßsystem mit einer geeigneten Messmethode (Dopplersonographie) überprüft werden kann (Fitzgerald u. Drumm 1977; McCallum et al. 1978).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Agarwal N, Suneja A, Arora S, Tandon OP, Sircar S (2004) Role of uterine artery velocimetry using color-flow Doppler and electromyography of uterus in prediction of preterm labor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30(6):402–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP (1995) Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1379–1387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almstrom H, Axelsson O, Cnattingius S (1992) Comparison of umbilicalartery velocimetry and cardiotocography for surveillance of smallfor-gestational-age fetuses. Lancet 340:936–940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arduini D, Rizzo G, Romanini C (1993) The development of abnormal heart rate patterns after absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: analysis of risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:43–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baschat AA (2005) Arterial and venous Doppler in the diagnosis and management of early onset fetal growth restriction. Early Hum Dev. 81(11):877–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie RB, Dornan JC (1989) Antenatal screening for intrauterine growth retardation with umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography. Br Med J 298:631–635

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clerici G, Luzietti R, Di Renzo GC (2001) Monitoring of antepartum and intrapartum fetal hypoxemia: pathophysiological basis and available techniques Biol Neonate 79:246–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies JA, Gallivan S, Spencer JA (1992) Randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy. Lancet 340:1299–1303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Divon MY (1995) Randomized controlled trials of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: how many are too many. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol:377–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrazzi E, Bozzo M, Rigano S, Bellotti M, Morabito A, Pardi G, Battaglia FC, Galan HL (2002) Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 19(2):140–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald DE, Drumm JE (1977) Non-invasive measurement of human circulation using ultrasound: a new method. Br Med J 2:1450–1451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon R, Van den Hof M, Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2003) The use of fetal Doppler in obstetrics. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 25(7):601–614

    Google Scholar 

  • GRIT Study Group (1996) The GRIT Study Group. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 67:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haram K, Softeland E, Bukowski R (2006) Intrauterine growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 93(1):5–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington KF, Campbell S, Bewley S, Bower S (1991) Doppler velocimetry studies of the uterine artery in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intra-uterine growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 42:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington K, Cooper D, Lees C, Hecher K, Campbell S (1996) Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:182–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness UF, Mari G (2004) Diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Perinatol. 31(4):743–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyna C (2003) Verlauf und Prognose von Schwangerschaften mit pränatal diagnostiziertem pathologischem Doppler in der A. umbilicalis. Medizinische Fakultät Charité der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Dissertationsschrift

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecher K, Campbell S, Doyle P, Harrington K, Nicolaides K (1995) Assessment of fetal compromise by Doppler ultrasound investigation of the fetal circulation. Arterial, intracardiac, and venous blood flow velocity studies. Circulation 91:129–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone FD, Prescott R, Hoskins P, Greer IA, McGlew T, Compton M (1993) The effect of introduction of umbilical Doppler recordings to obstetric practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:733–741

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP, Kostense PJ, Arduini D, Montenegro N, Todros T (1994) Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 344:1664–1668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiserud T, Eik-Nes SH, Blaas HG, Hellevik LR (1991) Ultrasonographic velocimetry of the ductus venosus. Lancet 338:1412–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdi W, Fayyad A, Thakur V, Harrington K. (2004) Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 10;117(1):20–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera J, Tomaselli J, Urlesberger B, Maurer U, Hausier M, Gradnitzer E, Burmucic K, Muller W (2002) Absent or reversed end-diastolic blood flow in the umbilical artery and abnormal Doppler cerebroplacental ratio—cognitive, neurological and somatic development at 3 to 6 years. Early Hum Dev. 69(1–2):47–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kywon JY, Kwon HS, Kim YH, Park YW (2006) Abnormal Doppler velocimetry is related to adverse perinatal outcome for borderline amniotic fluid index during third trimester. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 32(6)545–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees C, Baumgartner H (2005) The TRUFFLE study-a collaborative publicly funded project from concept to reality: how to negotiate an ethical, administrative and funding obstacle course in the European Union. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 25(2):105–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mason GC, Lilford RJ, Porter J, Nelson E, Tyrell S (1993) Randomised comparison of routine versus highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:130–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum WD, Williams CS, Napel S, Daigle RE (1978) Fetal blood velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 132:425–429

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mires GJ, Williams FL, Leslie J, Howie PW (1998) Assesment of uterine arterial notching as a screening test for adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:317–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newnham JP, Patterson LL, James IR, Diepeveen DA, Reid SE (1990) An evaluation of the efficacy of Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis as a screening test in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162(2):403–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini U, Nicolaidis P, Fisk NM, Vaughan Jl, Fusi L, Gleeson R, Rodeck CH (1990) Limited role of fetal blood sampling in prediction of outcome in intrauterine growth retardation. Lancet 336:768–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson JP (1999) Doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancies. In: Enkin MW, JNC Keirse, MJ Renfrew, JP Neilson (eds) Pregnancy and childbirth module. Oxord: Update software. (Cochrane database of systematic reviews)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaides KH, Spencer K, Avgidou K, Faiola S, Falcon O (2005) Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated twostage first-trimester screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 25(3):221–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oepkes D, Seaward PG, Vandenbussche FP, DIAMOND Study Group (2006) Doppler ultrasonography versus amniocentesis to predict fetal anemia. N Engl J Med 13;355(2):156–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan T, Sbracia M, D’Ancona RL, Copel JA, Mari G (1998) Arterial and venous Doppler velocimetry in the severely growth-restricted fetus and associations with adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:39–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park YW, Cho JS, Kim HS, Kim JS, Song CH (1996) The clinical implication of early diastolic notch in the third trimester Doppler waveform analysis of the uterine artery. J Ultrasound Med 15:47–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park YW, Cho JS, Choi HM, Kim TY, Lee SH, Yu JK, Kim JW (2000) Clinical significance of early diastolic notch depth: uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in the third trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 182(5):1204–1209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piazze J, Padula F, Cerekja A, Cosmi EV, Anceschi MM (2005) Prognostic value of umbilical-middle cerebral artery pulsatility index ratio in fetuses with growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 91(3)233–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM (1993) Doppler-Ultraschall: Patientensicherheit und Einbindung der Methode in das klinische Management. Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 33(1):113–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM (1997) Indikation zur Dopplersonographie während der Schwangerschaft. Arch Gynecol Obstet 260:153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM (2003) Standards in der Perinatalmedizin-Dopplersonographie in der Schwangerschaft. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 63:21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM (2007) Dopplersonographie: Sicherheitsaspekte. In: Steiner H, Schneider KTM (Hrsg.) Dopplersonographie und Geburtshilfe. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York; (im Druck)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM, Amberg-Wendland D, Renz S, Fürstenau U (1991) Prospektiv randomisierte Untersuchung zum klinischen Wert der Dopplersonographie als Screeningverfahren. Gynäkol Rundschau 31:139–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skodler WD, Philipp K, Pateisky N, Reinold E (1989) Practical use of blood flow with pulsed ultrasound in the 3d trimester of an at-risk pregnancy. Ultraschall Med 10:230–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Spiegelhalter DJ, Levene M; GRIT Study Group (2004) Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 364(9433)513–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valcamonico A, Danti L, Frusca T, Soregaroli M, Zucca S, Abrami F, Tiberti A (1994) Absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: risk of neonatal morbidity and brain damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:796–801

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wienerroither H, Steiner H, Tomaselli J, Lobendanz M, Thun-Hohenstein L (2001) Intrauterine blood flow and long-term intellectual, neurologic, and social development. Obstet Gynecol. 97(3):449–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München

    K. T. M. Schneider Prof.Dr.med.

Authors
  1. K. T. M. Schneider Prof.Dr.med.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich

    Horst Steiner

  2. Klinikum rechts der Isar, Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München

    Karl-Theo M. Schneider

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneider, K.T.M. (2008). Integration der Dopplersonographie in das klinische Management. In: Steiner, H., Schneider, KT.M. (eds) Dopplersonographie in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72371-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72371-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72370-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72371-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation