Abstract
Earthquake Alarms Systems, ElarmS, is a methodology for providing warning of forthcoming ground shaking during earthquakes. The approach uses a network of seismic instruments to detect the first-arriving energy at the surface, the P-waves, and translate the information contained in these low amplitude waves into a prediction of the peak ground shaking that follows. The instruments closest to the epicenter are the first to detect the seismic energy, and by using a seismic network this information can be integrated to produce a map of future ground shaking everywhere. The ElarmS methodology uses the frequency content of the P-wave arrival to estimate earthquake magnitude, arrival times to determine location, and then predicts the ground shaking using a radial attenuation relation. All data is gathered continuously and the hazard map updated every second. As observations of peak ground shaking are also made close to the epicenter they are integrated into the hazard assessment. Here, the methodology is applied to a set of 32 earthquakes in southern California to assess the accuracy and timeliness of warning if such a system was implemented using the existing seismic network. If there was no data telemetry delays the first warning would be available before the S-wave arrival at the epicenter for 56% of the earthquakes. The average absolute magnitude error at this time is 0.44 units and the error in the average absolute peak ground acceleration [ln(PGApredicted) — ln(PGAobserved)] is 1.08. Within 5 sec warning are available for 97% of the events, the average magnitude error is 0.33 units, and the average PGA error is 1.00. To further assess the utility of ElarmS implementation in California, probabilistic warning time distribution functions are determined for cities in northern California. Using the set of future likely earthquakes provided by the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2003) the warning times that the ElarmS methodology could provide (if implemented) can be estimated, and a probability of occurrence associated. The alarm time is defined as the time when 4 sec of P-wave data is available at 4 seismic stations. At this point in time the average magnitude error is 0.5 units. The warning times range from zero seconds to over a minute, the most likely warning times range from seconds to a few tens of seconds depending on location. The largest magnitude earthquakes are also associated with the greatest warning times and it is more likely than not, that San Francisco would receive more than 20 sec warning for earthquakes generating the most damaging ground shaking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismo Res Lett 68, 94–127
Allen RM, Kanamori H (2003) The potential for earthquake early warning in Southern California. Science 300:786–789
Boese M, Erdik M, Wenzel F (2004) Real-time prediction of ground motion from p-wave records. Eos Trans AGU Fall Meet Suppl 85, Abstract S21A.0251
Bolt BA (1968) The focus of the 1906 California earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 50:457–471
Boore DM (1977) Strong-motion recordings of California earthquake of April 18, 1906. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67:561–577
Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes; a summary of recent work. Seismo Res Lett 68:128–153
Campbell KW (1981) Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 71:2039–2070
Campbell KW (1997), Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismo Res Lett 68:154–179
Cooper JD (1868) Earthquake indicator. In: Evening Bulletin (ed) San Francisco
Erdik MO, Fahjan Y, Ozel O, Alcik H, Aydin M, Gul M (2003) Istanbul earthquake early warning and rapid response system. Eos Trans AGU Fall Meet Suppl 84, Abstract S42B.0153
Espinosa Aranda JM, Jimenez A, Ibarrola G, Alcantar F, Aguilar A, Inostroza M, Maldonado S (1995) Mexico city seismic alert system. Seismo Res Lett 66:42–52
Field EH (2000) A modified ground-motion attenuation relationship for southern california that accounts for detailed site classification and a basin-depth effect. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:S209–S221
Frankel A, Mueller C, Barnhard T, Perkins D, Leyendecker EV, Dickman N, Hanson S, Hopper M (1996) National seismic hazard maps. U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 96-532, Denver
Fukushima Y, Irikura K (1982) Attenuation characteristics of peak ground motions in the 1995 Hyogo-Ken. J Phys Earth 45:135–146
Grasso VF, Allen RM (in review) Uncertainty in real-time earthquake hazard predictions
Heaton TH (1985) A model for a seismic computerized alert network. Science 228;987–990
Horiuchi S, Negishi H, Abe K, Kamimura A, Fujinawa Y (2005) An automatic processing system for broadcasting earthquake alarms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:708–718
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 71:2011–2038
Kamigaichi O (2004) Jma earthquake early warning. J Japan Assoc Earthquake Eng 4
Lockman A, Allen RM (2005) Single station earthquake characterization for early warning. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:2029–2039
Lockman A, Allen RM (2007) Magnitude-period scaling relations for Japan and the Pacific Northwest: Implications for earthquake early warning. Bull Seismol Soc Am
Lomax A (2005) A reanalysis of the hypocentral location and related observations for the great 1906 California earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:861–877
Nakamura Y (1988) On the urgent earthquake detection and alarm system (Uredas). Proc. 9th World Conf. Earthquake Eng., VII, 673–678
Nakamura Y (1996) Real-time information systems for hazards mitigation. Proceedings of Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2134
Nakamura Y (2004) Uredas, urgent earthquake detection and alarm system, now and future. Proc. 13th World Conf. Earthquake Eng., August 2004, Paper No. 908
Odaka T, Ashiya K, Tsukada S, Sato S, Ohtake K, Nozaka D (2003) A new method of quickly estimating epicentral distance and magnitude from a single seismic record. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:526–532
Olson E, Allen RM (2005) The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture. Nature 438:212–215
Richter CF (1958) Elementary seismology. W. H. Freeman, 768 pp
Sadigh K, Chang CY, Egan JA, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismo Res Lett 68:180–189
Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15:557–564
Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H, Scrivner CW, Worden CB (1999) Trinet “shakemaps”: Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in Southern California. Earthquake Spectra 15:537–555
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2003) Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay region: 2003 to 2031. U.S. Geological Survey
Wu Y-M, Kanamori H (2005) Experiment on an onsite early warning method for the Taiwan early warning system. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:347–353
Wu Y-M, Kanamori H, Allen RM, Hauksson E (in review) An onsite earthquake early warning method for the Southern California seismic network. Bull Seism Soc Am
Wu Y-M, Teng T-l (2002) A virtual subnetwork approach to earthquake early warning. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2008–2018
Wu YM, Kanamori H (2005) Rapid assessment of damage potential of earthquakes in Taiwan from the beginning of p waves. Bull Seism Soc Am 95:1181–1185
Wu YM, Shin TC, Tsai YB (1998) Quick and reliable determination of magnitude for seismic early warning. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:1254–1259
Zoback ML, Jachens RC, Olson JA (1999) Abrupt along-strike change in tectonic style: San Andreas fault zone, San Francisco Peninsula. J Geophys Res 104:10719–10742
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, R.M. (2007). The ElarmS Earthquake Early Warning Methodology and Application across California. In: Gasparini, P., Manfredi, G., Zschau, J. (eds) Earthquake Early Warning Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72241-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72241-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72240-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72241-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)