Skip to main content

Seismic Early Warning Systems: Procedure for Automated Decision Making

  • Chapter

Abstract

Earthquake Early Warning Systems (EWS) potentially allow mitigation measures to be carried out from the moment in which a seismic event is detected, depending on the amount of warning time available. Examples of such measures are evacuation of buildings, shut-down of critical systems (nuclear reactors, industrial chemical processes, etc.) and stopping of high-speed trains.

In areas close to faults, where seismic EWS are especially relevant, only tens of seconds of warning are available. Such short warning times mean that to be effective a seismic EWS must depend on automated procedures, including those for decision making about whether to activate mitigation measures; the time is too short to require human intervention when the event is first detected. As a result of the automation, careful attention must be paid to the design of the local seismic EWS for each critical facility; in particular, a means of controlling the trade-off between false alarms and missed alarms is desirable.

To investigate this trade-off, the consequences of the two alternatives of taking mitigation actions or not acting must be analyzed, accounting for significant uncertainty in the predictions.

A feasibility assessment of any proposed regional EWS is of critical importance, and it should involve an examination of whether the requirements, in terms of warning time available and the probability of making wrong decisions, are met. A methodology is presented for estimating the probabilities of making wrong decisions that can be incorporated in a feasibility assessment of proposed EWS. To illustrate the methodology we consider the case of feasibility assessment of a seismic EWS for Southern California.

We, also, present a decision-making procedure based on the real-time evaluation of the consequences of taking no action and of activating mitigation measures which is based on the probabilities of false and missed alerts. The threshold at which mitigating actions should be taken is quantified based on a cost-benefit analysis. The method is applied to the M 4.75 Yorba Linda seismic event occurred on 3 September 2002, in Orange County, California.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen RM (2004) Rapid Magnitude Determination for Earthquake Early Warning. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Multidisciplinary Approach to Seismic Risk Problems, Sant’Angelo dei Lombardi, September 22, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RM, Kanamori H (2003) The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Southern California. Science 300:786–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barroso LR, Winterstein S (2002) Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Controlled Steel Moment-resisting Frame Structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31:2049–2066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates S, Cullen A, Raftery A (2003) Bayesian Uncertainty Assessment in Multicompartment Deterministic Simulation Models for Environmental Risk Assessment. Environmetrics 14:355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cua G (2004) Creating the Virtual Seismologist: developments in ground motion characterization and seismic early warning. PhD Thesis in Civil Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, December 2004, http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechETD:etd-02092005-125601

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua G, Heaton T (2004) Characterizing Average Properties of Southern California Ground Motion Envelopes. In: 2004 SCEC Annual Meeting Proceedings and Abstracts, vol XIV

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua G, Heaton T (2004) Illustrating the Virtual Seismologist (VS) Method for Seismic Early Warning on the 3 September 2002 M=4.75 Yorba Linda, California Earthquake. In: 2004 SCEC Annual Meeting Proceedings and Abstracts, vol XIV

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso VF, Beck JL, Manfredi G (2005a) Seismic Early Warning Systems: Procedure for Automated Decision Making. Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Report Number EERL 2005-02

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso VF, Iervolino I, Occhiuzzi A, Manfredi G (2005b) Critical Issues of Seismic Early Warning Systems for Structural Control. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, Rome, Italy, June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanda K, Kobori T, Ikeda Y, Koshida H (1994) The Development of a Pre-arrival Transmission System for Earthquake Information Applied to Seismic Response Controlled Structures. In; Proceedings of 1st World Conference on Structural Control, 2, IASC, California, USA, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WHK, Espinosa-Aranda JM (1998) Earthquake Early Warning Systems: Current Status and Perspectives. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Early Warning Systems for Natural Disaster Reduction, pp 409–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Occhiuzzi A, Grasso VF, Manfredi G (2004)Early Warning Systems from a Structural Control Perspective. In: Proceedings 3rd European Conference on Structural Control, Vienna University of Technology, Austria, July 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Paté-Cornell E (1986) Warning Systems in Risk Managment. Risk Analysis 6(2):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter KA, Beck JL, Shaikhutdinov RV (2002) Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables. Earthquake Spectra 18:719–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter KA, Beck JL, Shaikhutdinov RV, Au SK, Mizukoshi K, Miyamura M, Ishida H, Moroi T, Tsukada Y, Masuda M (2004) Effect of Seismic Risk on Lifetime Property Values. Earthquake Spectra 20:1211–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saita J, Nakamura Y (1998) UrEDAS: The Early Warning System for Mitigation of Disasters caused by Earthquakes and Tsunamis. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Early Warning Systems for Natural Disaster Reduction, EWC98, pp 453–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Seismological Research Letters (1997) Issue on Ground Motion Attenuation Models. 68(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald A (1947) Sequential Analysis. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, and Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland M (2001) Earthquake Alarm, Rapid Response and Early Warning Systems: Low Cost Systems for Seismic Risk Reduction. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Disaster Reduction, Reston, Virginia, U.S., August 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland M, Griesser L, Kuendig C (2000) Seismic Early Warning System for a Nuclear Power Plant. In: Proceedings of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grasso, V.F., Beck, J.L., Manfredi, G. (2007). Seismic Early Warning Systems: Procedure for Automated Decision Making. In: Gasparini, P., Manfredi, G., Zschau, J. (eds) Earthquake Early Warning Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72241-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics