Advertisement

Implementation alternatives for an integrated 3D Information Model

  • Ludvig Emgård
  • Sisi Zlatanova
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

The 3DIM (3D Integrated Model) is an information model under development which intends to integrate geographic features on the earth surface as well as above and below the earth surface into a common semantic-geometric model. We present and discuss two alternative implementations of the information model for DBMS. In the first alternative semantics are separated from geometry and organized into two table groups while in the second alternative semantic tables incorporates the geometry of the objects.

Keywords

Earth Surface Semantic Feature Semantic Model Implementation Alternative Individual Polygon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arens C, Stoter J, van Oosterom P (2005) Modelling 3D spatial objects in a geo-DBMS using a 3D primitive. Computers & Geosciences 31 (2005) 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billen R, Zlatanova S (2003) Conceptual issues in 3D Urban GIS, In: GIM International, Vol. 17, No. 1, January 2003, pp.33–35Google Scholar
  3. Breuning M, Zlatanova S (2006) 3D Geo-DBMS, In: 3D large scale data integration: challenges and opportunities, CRC Press, Taylor&Francis Group, pp. 87–135Google Scholar
  4. Caglioni M (2006) Ontologies of Urban Models, Technical report n°4, Short Term Scientific Mission Report, Urban Ontologies for an improved communication in urban civil engineering projects, Towntology Project 5p, http://www.towntology.net/Documents/STSM-Caglioni.pdf [last accessed 2007-08-27]
  5. Coors V (2003) 3D-GIS in networking environments, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Volume 27, Number 4, July 2003, pp. 345–357(13)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Emgård L, Zlatanova S (2007) Design of an integrated 3D information model, in: Coors, Rumor, Fendel&Zlatanova UDMS Annual 2007, Taylor & Francis, 26th proceedings of UDMS, 10–12 October 2007, Stuttgart, (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Gröger G, Kolbe T, Czerwinski A (2006) OpenGIS CityGML Implementation Specification. http://www.citygml.org/docs/CityGML_Specification_0.3.0_OGC_06-057.pdf [last accessed 2007-08-27]
  8. Haist J, Coors V (2005) The W3DS-Interface of CityServer3D In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Next Generation 3D City Models 2005, Bonn pp.63–67Google Scholar
  9. Herring J (2001): The OpenGIS Abstract Specification, Topic 1: Feature Geometry (ISO 19107 Spatial Schema), Version 5. OGC Document Number 01-101. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/as [last accessed 2007-08-27]
  10. INSPIRE, The European Parliament (2007) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) (PE-CONS 3685/2006, 2004/0175 (COD) C6-0445/2006) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/FindByProcnum.do?lang=2&procnum=COD/2000/0175 [last accessed 2007-08-27]
  11. Kofler M (1998) R-trees for the visualisation of large 3D GIS databases, PhD thesis, TU, Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
  12. Köninger A, Bartel S (1998) 3D-GIS for Urban Purposes. GeoInformatica 2:1,pp 79–103 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Louwsma J, Zlatanova S, van Lammeren R, van Oosterom P (2006) Specifying and implementing constraints in GIS — with examples from a geo-virtual reality system, GeoInformatica 10 (2006): pp 531–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. NADM (2004) North American Geologic Map Data Model Steering Committee Conceptual Model 1.0—A conceptual model for geologic map information: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004–1334, 58 p., accessed online at URL http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1334. Also published as Geo-logical Survey of Canada Open File 4737, 1 CD-ROM.
  15. OGC 1999 OpenGIS Simple Features Specification For SQL, Revision 1.1 http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sfs [last accessed 2007-08-31]
  16. Oracle (2007) Oracle Spatial 11g Planned features presentation materialGoogle Scholar
  17. Pantazis D (1997) CON.G.O.O.: A conceptual formalism for geographic database design. In Geographic Information Research, Bridging the Atlantic (London: Taylor & Francis), pp. 348–367.Google Scholar
  18. Penninga, F., van Osteroom, P. & Kazar, B. 2006. A Tetrahedronized Irregular Network Based DBMS approach for 3D Topographic Data Modeling. Progress in Spatial Data Handling Google Scholar
  19. Plümer L, Kolbe T, Gröger G, Schmittwilken, J & Stroh V (2007) 3D-Geodatenbank Berlin, Dokumentation V1.0. http://www.3dcitydb.org/index.php?id=259 [last accessed 2007-08-27]
  20. Stoter J, Zlatanova S (2003) Visualisation and editing of 3D objects organised in a DBMS, J., In: Proceedings of the EuroSDR Com V. Workshop on Visu alisation and Rendering, 22–24 January 2003, Enschede, The Netherlands, 16pGoogle Scholar
  21. Zlatanova S, (2000) 3D GIS for urban development, PhD thesis, ISBN 90-6164-178-0, ICG, TUGraz, Austria, ITC publication 69, ISBN 90-6164-178-0Google Scholar
  22. Zlatanova S, Stoter J (2006) The role of DBMS in the new generation GIS architecture, in: Rana & Sharma (eds.) Frontiers of Geographic Information Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg ISBN-1-3-540-25685-7, pp. 155–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ludvig Emgård
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sisi Zlatanova
    • 1
  1. 1.OTB, section GIS TechnologyDelft University of Technologythe Netherlands
  2. 2.SWECO Position ABSweden

Personalised recommendations