Ontology for Land Development Decisions and Plans

  • Nikhil Kaza
  • Lewis D. Hopkins
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 61)


Urban Development Urban Planning Decision Situation Adjacent Property Urban Development Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Keita, A., Laurini, R., Roussey, C., Zimmerman, M.: Towards an ontology for urban planning: The towntology project. In: CD-ROM Proceedings of the 24th UDMS Symposium, Chioggia (2004) 12.I.1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hopkins, L.D.: Urban Development: The logic of making plans. Island Press, Washington, DC (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laurini, R.: Information Systems for Urban Planning. Taylor & Francis, New York, NY (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bratman, M.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hopkins, L.D., Kaza, N., Pallathucheril, V.G.: Representing urban development plans and regulations as data: A planning data model. Environment & Planning B : Planning and Design 32(4) (2005) 597-615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rinner, C.: Argumaps for spatial planning. In Laurini, R., ed.: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on TeleGeoProcessing, Lyon, France (1999) 95-102Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knaap, G.J., Ding, C., Hopkins, L.D.: The effect of light rail announcements on price gradients. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(1) (2001) 32-39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Urbana: 2005 Comprehensive Plan. City of Urbana, Urbana, IL. (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Couclelis, H.: Where has the future gone? Rethinking the role of integrated land-use models in spatial planning”. Environment & Planning A 37(8) (2005) 1353-1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Couclelis, H.: People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): Beyond the raster- vector debate in GIS. In Frank, A.U., Campari, I., Formentini, U., eds.: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag (1992) 65-77Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Campari, I.: Uncertain boundaries in urban space. In Burrough, P.A., Frank, A.U., eds.: Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. Talyor & Francis, London, UK (1996) 57-69Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Worboys, M.F., Duckham, M.: GIS: A Computing Perspective. 2nd. edn. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiggins, D.: Sameness and Substance. Blackwell, Oxford, UK (1980)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mark, D.M., Smith, B.: Ontology and geographic kinds. In: International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Vancouver, Canada (1998) 308-320Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levin, P.H.: Government and the Planning Process. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London, UK (1976)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carrera, F.: City Knowledge: An Infrastructure for Urban Maintenance, Manage- ment and Planning. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaza, N.: Towards a data model for urban planning: Ontological constructs for representing regulations and guidelines with geography. Master’s thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Allen, J.F., Ferguson, G.: Actions and events in temporal logic. In Stock, O., ed.: Spatial and Temporal Resoning. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA (1997) 205-243CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikhil Kaza
    • 1
  • Lewis D. Hopkins
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Urban & Regional PlanningUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Department of Urban & Regional PlanningUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations