Ontology Based Communications Through Model Driven Tools: Feasibility of the MDA Approach in Urban Engineering Projects

  • R. Grangel
  • C. Métral
  • A. F. Cutting-Decelle
  • J. P. Bourey
  • R. I. M. Young
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 61)


Model Transformation Model Drive Object Management Group Enterprise Model Model Drive Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    IEEE: IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elvesæter, B., Hahn, A., Berre, A.J., Neple, T.: Towards an Interoperability Frame- work for Model-Driven Development of Software Systems. In: 1st International Conference on Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications (I-ESA’05). (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    OMG: MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. Object Management Group. Document Number: omg/2003-06-01 edn. (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berre, A., Hahn, A., Akehurst, D., Bezivin, J., Tsalgatidou, A., Vermaut, F., Kutvonen, L., Linington, P.: Deliverable D9.1: State-of-the art for Interoperability architecture approaches, Model driven and dynamic, federated enterprise interop- erability architectures and interoperability for non-functional aspects. Technical report, INTEROP-D9 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    OMG: Model Driven Architecture (MDA), Architecture Board ORMSC. Object Management Group. Document Number: ormsc/2001-07-01 edn. (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaw, M., Garlan, D.: Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice Hall (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleppe , A .G . , Warmer , J . , Bast , W . : MDA Explained : The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Classification of Model Transformation Approaches. In: OOPSLA’03 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture. (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ciocoiu, M., Gruninger, M., Nau, D.: Ontologies for Integrating Engineering Ap- plications. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 1 (2000) 12-22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sowa, J.: Glossary. (2006) Accessed November 2006.
  11. 11.
    Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L., Studer, R., Volz, R.: Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management. Journal IEEE Intelligent Systems 18(2) (2003) 26-33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    CNR-IASI: Deliverable D8.1: State of the art and state of the practice including initial possible research orientations. Technical report, INTEROP-D8 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noy, N., Musen, M.: SMART: Automated Support for Ontology Merging and Alignment. In: Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling, and Management. (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doan, A.H., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to Map Ontologies on the Semantic Web. VLDB journal 12 (4) (2003) 303-319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ashpole, B.: Ontology translation protocol (ontrapro). In Messina, E., Meystel, A., eds.: Proceedings of Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS’04). (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-based Ontology Alignment in OWL-lite. In: Proceedings of the 15th ECAI. (2004) 333-337Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM - Quick Ontology Mapping. In: Proceedings of 3rd ISWC. (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maedche, A., Motik, B., Silva, N., Volz, R.: MAFRA - A MApping FRAmework for Distributed Ontologies. In: EKAW’02: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web. (2002) 235-250Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ehrig, M., Euzenat, J.: Relaxed Precision and Recall for Ontology Matching. In: K-CAP’05, Workshop Integrating Ontologies. (2005) 25-32Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IDEAS: Deliverable D1.1 part C: SotA on Architecture & Platforms. Technical report, IDEAS (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ATHENA: Advanced Technologies for interoperability of Heterogeneous Enterprise Networks and their Applications IP (IST-2001- 507849). (2006)
  22. 22.
    Teller, J., Keita, A., Roussey, C., Laurini, R.: Urban ontologies for an improved communication in urban civil engineering projects. In: SAGEO. (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaza, N.: Towards a data model for urban planning: ontological constructs for rep- resenting regulations an guidelines with geography. Technical report, Departement of Urban & Regional Planning, University of Illinois (2004) Project reportGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Urbana: The Urbana Zoning Ordinance, City of Urbana, IL (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schevers, H., Trinidad, G., Drogemuller, R.: Towards integrated assessments for urban development. ITcon Journal 11 (2006) 225-236Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bourey, J., Grangel, R., Doumeingts, G., Berre, A.: Deliverable DTG2.2: Report on Model Interoperability. Technical report, INTEROP-TG2 (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Doumeingts, G., Berre, A., Bourey, J.P., Grangel, R.: Deliverable DTG2.1: Report on Model establishment. Technical report, INTEROP-TG2 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grangel, R., Bourey, J., Berre, A.: Solving Problems in the Parametrisation of ERPs using a Model-Driven Approach. In: 2nd International Conference on Inter- operability for Enterprise Software and Applications (I-ESA’06). (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schmidt, K., Simone, C.: Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foun- dation of CSCW Systems Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 5 (1996) 155-200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kubicki, S., Bignon, J., Halin, G., Humbert, P.: Assistance to building construction coordination - towards a multi-view cooperative platform. ITcon Journal 11 (2006) 565-586Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sprinkle, J., Ledeczi, A., Karsai, G., Nordstrom, G.: The new metamodeling gen- eration. In: IEEE Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems. (1999)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    OMG: A proposal for an MDA Foundation Model. Object Management Group. Document Number: ormsc/2005-04-01 edn. (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    INTEROP: Interoperability Research for Networked Enterprises Applications and Software NoE (IST-2003-508011). (2006)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Grangel
    • 1
  • C. Métral
    • 2
  • A. F. Cutting-Decelle
    • 3
  • J. P. Bourey
    • 4
  • R. I. M. Young
    • 5
  1. 1.Grupo de Investigación en Integración y Re-Ingeniería de Sistemas (IRIS)Universitat Jaume ICastellóSpain
  2. 2.Institut d'architectureUniversity of GenevaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Industrial Engineering Research LaboratoryEcole Centrale ParisChatenay MalabryFrance
  4. 4.Industrial Engineering TeamEcole Centrale LilleVilleneuve d'AscqFrance
  5. 5.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughLoughborough

Personalised recommendations