Investigating a Bottom-up Approach for Extracting Ontologies from Urban Databases

  • Christophe Chaidron
  • Roland Billen
  • Jacques Teller
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 61)


Spatial Database Topological Relationship Object Definition Local Ontology Conceptual Data Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gruber, T. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 19935 (2): pp. 199-220.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morocho, V., L. Pérez-Vidal, and F. Saltor. Semantic integration on spatial databases. in Proceeding of VIII Jornadas de Ingenieria del Software y Bases de Datos. 2003. Alicante. pp. 603-612.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roussey, C., R. Laurini, C. Beaulieu, Y. Tardy and M. Zimmerman. Le projet Towntology. Un retour d’expérience pour la construction d’une ontologie urbaine. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 2004. 14(2): pp. 217-237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van der Vet, P.E. Bottom-up construction of ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Eengineering, 1998. 10(4): pp. 513-526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sowa, J. Top-level ontological categories. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies, 1995. 43(5-6): pp. 669-685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pantazis, D. and J.-P. Donnay. La conception de SIG. Méthode et formalisme. 1996. Paris: Hermes, 339 p.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fonseca, F., M.J. Egenhofer, P. Agouris and G. Câmara. Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS, 2002. 6(3): pp. 231-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruber, T. The role of common ontology in achieving sharable, reusable knowledge bases. in Proceeding of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 1991. Cambridge. pp. 601-602.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clementini, E., P. Di Felice and P. Van Oosterom, A small set of formal topological relationships suitable for end-user interaction. Advances in Spatial Databases LNCS 692, 1993. pp. 277-295.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egenhofer, M. A model for detailed binary topological relationships. Geomatica, 1993. 47(3-4): pp. 261-273.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pasquasy, F., F. Laplanche, Jean-Christophe Sainte and J.-P. Donnay. MECOSIG adapted to the design of distributed GIS. in On the move to Meaningful internet systems 2005, R. Meersman et al. (Eds): OTM Workshops 2005, LNCS 3762, pp. 1117-1126.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fonseca, F., C. Davis, and G. Câmara. Bridging ontologies and conceptua l schemas in geographic information integration. GeoInformatica, 2003. 7(4): pp. 355-378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caron, C., Y. Bédard and P. Gagnon. MODUL-R, un formalisme individuel adapté pour les SIRS. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 1993. 7(3), pp. 283-306.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tryfona, N., D. Pfoser and T. Hatzilacaos. Modelling behavior of geographic objects: an experience with the object modelling technique. at CASE, 1997. Barcelona.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parent, C., S. Spaccapietra, E. Zimányi, E. Donini, C. Plazanet, C. Vangenot, N. Rognon and P.-A. Crausaz. MADS, modèle conceptuel spatio-temporel. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 1997. 7(3-4): pp. 317-352.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bédard, Y. Visual modelling of spatial databases: towards spatial PVL and UML. Geomatica, 1999. 53(2): pp. 169-186.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bishr, Y.A. and W. Kuhn. Ontology-based modelling of geospatial information. presented at Third AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, 2000. Helsinki.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frank, A. Spatial Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, O. Stock, Editor. 1997. Dordrecht: Academic Publisher. pp. 135-153.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith, B. and D. Mark. Ontology and geographic kinds. in Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling., T Poiker and N. Chrisman, Editors. 1998. Burnaby: Simon Fraser University. pp. 308-320.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christophe Chaidron
    • 1
  • Roland Billen
    • 2
  • Jacques Teller
    • 3
  1. 1.Geomatics UnitUniversity of LiegeLiegeBelgium
  2. 2.Geomatics UnitUniversity of LiegeLiegeBelgium
  3. 3.Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, Lab. of Architectural MethodologyLEMA Université de LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations