Skip to main content

Abstract

In order to address difficulties in running RCTs, clinicians introduced the concept of a totally objective group of assessors to continually evaluate and review trial results and execution. These groups are known as Data Monitoring Committees (DMC) and have been set up to minimise trial complications while also optimizing trial implementation. Furthermore, as it quickly became apparent that the results of some trials had significant implications for patient care before trials had been completed, the DMCs who are responsible for the continual review of trial data also adopted the power to stop or advise extension of each experiment if deemed scientifically necessary. This chapter delineates the role of these committees, and also clari-fies some of their functions through some surgical trial examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. United States Food and Drug Administration (2001) Guidance for clinical trial sponsors: on the establishment and operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Cber/gdlns/clindatmon.htm

  2. Anon (1988) Organization, review, and administration of cooperative studies (Greenberg Report): a report from the Heart Special Project Committee to the National Advisory Heart Council, May 1967. Control Clin Trials 9:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anon (1973) The coronary drug project. Design, methods, and baseline results. Circulation 47:I1–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Canner PL, Berge KG, Wenger NK et al (1986) Fifteen year mortality in Coronary Drug Project patients: long-term ben-efit with niacin. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:1245–1255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (1998) NIH policy for data and safety monitoring. Available AT: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html

  6. National Cancer Institute (1999) Policy of the national cancer institute for data and safety monitoring of clinical trials. Available at: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/grantspolicies/datasa-fety.htm

  7. National Cancer Institute (2006) Guidelines for monitoring of clinical trials for Cooperative Groups, CCOP research bases, and The Clinical Trials Support Unit (CTSU). Available at: http://ctep.cancer.gov/monitoring/2006_ctmb_ guidelines.pdf

  8. DeMets DL, Fleming TR (2004) The independent statistician for data monitoring committees. Stat Med 23: 1513–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Naylor AR, Bolia A, Abbott RJ et al (1998) Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. J Vasc Surg 28:326–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackisch C, von Minckwitz G, Eidtmann H et al (2002) Dose-dense biweekly doxorubicin/docetaxel versus sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/cyclophos-phamide/docetaxel in operable breast cancer: second interim analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 3:276–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen-Mok M, Bangdiwala SI, Dominik R et al (2003) Termination of a randomized controlled trial of two vasec-tomy techniques. Control Clin Trials 24:78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Veronesi U, Maisonneuve P, Costa A et al (1998) Prevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen: preliminary findings from the Italian randomised trial among hysterectomised women. Italian Tamoxifen Prevention Study. Lancet 352:93–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anon (1994) Clinical advisory: carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 25:2523–2524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anon (1995) Carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. J Neurol Sci 129:76–77

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buchwald H, Matts JP, Hansen BJ et al (1987) Program on surgical control of the hyperlipidemias (POSCH): recruitment experience. Control Clin Trials 8:94S–104S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ashrafian, H., Mayer, E., Athanasiou, T. (2010). Monitoring Trial Effects. In: Athanasiou, T., Debas, H., Darzi, A. (eds) Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71915-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics