Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Questionnaires, Surveys, Scales in Surgical Research: Concepts and Methodology

  • Chapter
Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology

  • 2827 Accesses

Abstract

Appropriate data gathering is the key to a successful study, and the methods employed will invariably influence the results obtained and conclusions eventually drawn. This chapter works through different methods of data gathering techniques, namely, surveys, questionnaires and scales, discussing the concepts behind the development of such tools as well as their relative merits and drawbacks.

Forming an easy-to-understand overview of these main methodologies in use today, the chapter guides the readers on the development of population-based research questions in order to develop their own research tools as well as help them employ established ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Babbie E (2003) The practice of social research, 10th edn. Thomson/Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  2. Booth C (1902) Life and labour of the people in London. Macmillan, London New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowling A (2002) Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T (2004) Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ 328(7451): 1312–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryman A (2001) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campanelli P (1995) Minimising non-response before it happens: what can be done. Survey Meth Bul 37:35–37

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll JB (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawes RM, Smith TL (1985) Attitude and opinion measurement. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds) The handbook of social psychology: the individual in a social context. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Health (2002) Research governance framework for health and social care. Stationary Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frankfort-Nachmias C, Nachmias D (1996) Research methods in the social sciences, 5th edn. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. French C (1990) Computer assisted assessment. In: Beech JR, Harding L (eds) Testing people: a practical guide to psy-chometrics. NFER-Nelson, Windsor, pp 164

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garson GD (2006). Syllabus for PA 765: quantitative research in public administration. Available from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/pa765syl.htm. Accessed 25 October 2007

  14. Gillham B (2000) Developing a questionnaire. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hakim C (1987) Research design: strategies and choices in the design of social research. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hanson DJ (1980) Relationship between methods and judges in attitude behaviour research. Psychology 17:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  17. Howie JG et al. (1998) A comparison of a patient enable-ment instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract 15(2):165–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Howitt D and Cramer D (2000) First steps in research and statistics: a practical workbook for psychology students. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klepacz A (1991) Activity and health survey; possible effects on response of different versions of the same advance letter. Survey Methods Bul 29:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lemon N (1973) Attitudes and their measurement. Batsford, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lohr KN (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11(3):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lord FM, Novick MR (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores, Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mangione TW (1995) Mail surveys: improving the quality. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  24. McNeil BJ et al (1982) On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med 306(21):1259–1262

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan D (1993) Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art. Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moser CA, Kalton G (1985) Survey methods in social investigation, 2nd edn. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  27. NHS Health Survey Advice Centre: Sample Size 1995, Office of Population Censuses and Survey: London 3–5

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH (1957) The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robson C (1994) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rust J, Golombok S (1989) Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment. Routledge, London pp 164–168

    Google Scholar 

  31. Scott WA (1968) Attitude measurement. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds) The handbook of social psychology, vol 1: historical introduction — systematic positions. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp xv; 653 p

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shortell SM (1999) The emergence of qualitative methods in health services research. Health Serv Res 34(5 Pt 2):1083–1090

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sitzia J (1999) How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 11(4):319–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sofaer S (2002) Qualitative research methods. Int J Qual Health Care 14(4):329–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Spies RA et al. (2005) The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  36. Valois P, Godin G (1991) The importance of selecting appropriate adjective pairs for measuring attitude based on the semantic differential method. Qual Quant (25):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Hook, MP, Berkman, B, and Dunkle, R (1996) Assessment tools for general health care settings: PRIME-MD, OARS, and SF-36. Primary care evaluation of mental health disorders. Older Americans Resources and Services Questionnaire; Short Form-36. Health Soc Work 21(3):230–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  1. Attitude measurement scales: Buros mental measurement yearbooks (Buros, 1978) [35]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Health (2002) Research governance framework for health and social care. Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Download AMOS™ (Student Version) for free: (http://amos-development.com/download/)

  4. Office for National Statistics (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/data/harmonisation/default.asp)

  5. Structural equation modelling in AMOS: http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/structur.htm#AMOSmeasure

  6. The Centre for Applied Social Surveys (CASS) (http://qb.soc.surrey.ac.uk/)

  7. Validity and reliablity of scales can be assessed in the methods section of Rust J, Golombok S (1989) Modern psycho-metrics: the science of psychometric assessment. Routledge, London, pp 165–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, 10th Floor, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother (QEQM) Building, London, W2 1NY, UK

    Mohammed Shamim Rahman & Sana Usman

  2. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust at St Mary's Hospital Campus, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK

    Oliver Warren & Thanos Athanasiou

Authors
  1. Mohammed Shamim Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sana Usman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oliver Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thanos Athanasiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Biosurgery & Surgical Technology, Imperial College London St. Mary's Hospital London, 10th floor QEQM Bldg. Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom

    Thanos Athanasiou  & Ara Darzi  & 

  2. UCSF Global Health Sciences, 3333 California Street, Suite 285, San Francisco L, CA, 94143-0443, USA

    Haile Debas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rahman, M.S., Usman, S., Warren, O., Athanasiou, T. (2010). Questionnaires, Surveys, Scales in Surgical Research: Concepts and Methodology. In: Athanasiou, T., Debas, H., Darzi, A. (eds) Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71915-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation