Skip to main content

The Use of Bayesian Networks in Decision-Making

  • Chapter
Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology

Abstract

Bayesian networks (BNs) are graphical tools of reasoning with uncertainties. In recent years, BNs have been increasingly recognized for their capacity to represent probabilistic dependencies explicitly and intuitively, handle incomplete information, and capture expert judgments along with hard data. In this chapter, we examine the underlying logic of BNs and discuss their applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We constructed all the Bayesian networks in this chapter using Netica® (Norsys Software Corp. http://www.norsys.com/).

  2. 2.

    If the interpretation has a fixed relationship with the actual test, e.g., correct 80% of the time regardless of the test results, then we can keep the original network (Fig. 28.1), and simply provide evidences in probability terms, e.g., P(X-ray result = negative) = 0.80. The expanded network (Fig. 28.2) can handle more complex relationships, such as when the accuracy of the interpretation differs for a positive and a negative test result.

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

BN:

Bayesian network

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PPV:

Positive predictive value

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

References

  1. Bayes T (1763) An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Phil Trans 53:370–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards W (1962) Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Hum Factors 4:59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gevaert O, De Smet F, Kirk E et al (2006) Predicting the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location: Bayesian networks with expert prior information compared to logistic regression. Hum Reprod 21:1824–1831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghahramani Z (1998) Learning dynamic Bayesian networks. In: Giles CL, Gori M (eds) Adaptive processing of sequences and data structures. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, LNAI, vol. 1387. Springer-Verlag, pp 168–197

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henriksen HJ, Barlebo HC (2007) Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management. J Environ Manage 88(4):1025–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard RA, Matheson JE (1984) Influence diagrams. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds) Readings on the principles and applications of decision analysis II. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lauritzen SL, Spiegelhalter DJ (1988) Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B50:157–224

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ledley RS, Lusted LB (1959) Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason. Science 130:9–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neil M, Fenton N, Tailor M (2005) Using Bayesian networks to model expected and unexpected operational losses. Risk Anal 25:963–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pang BC, Kuralmani V, Joshi R et al (2007) Hybrid outcome prediction model for severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 24:136–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo

    Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips LD, Hays WL, Edwards W (1966) Conservatism in complex probabilistic inference. IEEE Trans Hum Fact HFE 7:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ni, Z., Phillips, L.D., Hanna, G.B. (2010). The Use of Bayesian Networks in Decision-Making. In: Athanasiou, T., Debas, H., Darzi, A. (eds) Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71915-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics