Skip to main content

Measurement of Surgical Performance for Delivery of a Competency-Based Training Curriculum

  • Chapter
Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology
  • 2809 Accesses

Abstract

In order to provide a high quality health care service to the public, it is essential to employ proficient practitioners, using tools to the highest of their abilities. Surgery being a craft speciality, the focus is on an assessment of technical skill within the operating theatre. However, objective and reliable methods to measure technical skill within the operating theatre do not exist. Numerous research groups, including our own, have reported the objectivity, validity and reliability of technical skills assessments in surgical disciplines. The development and application of objective and reliable technical skills assessments of surgeons performing innovative procedures within the operating theatre can allow a judgement to be made with regard to the credentialing of surgeons to integrate novel procedures into their clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK et al (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 327:1032–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM (2003) Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 17:1525–1529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pellegrini CA (2002) Invited commentary: the ACGME “Outcomes Project”. American Council for Graduate Medical Education. Surgery 131:214–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1986) Mind over machine. Free, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Satava RM, Cuschieri A, Hamdorf J (2003) Metrics for objective assessment. Surg Endosc 17:220–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Society of American Gastrointestinal Surgeons (SAGES) (1991) Granting of privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161:324–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aggarwal R, Hance J, Darzi A (2004) Surgical education and training in the new millennium. Surg Endosc 18:1409–1410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K et al (2007) An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room. Ann Surg 245:992–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Francis NK, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2002) The performance of master surgeons on the advanced Dundee endoscopic psycho-motor tester: contrast validity study. Arch Surg 137:841–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eubanks TR, Clements RH, Pohl D et al (1999) An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189:566–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallagher AG, Smith CD, Bowers SP et al (2003) Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197:479–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S et al (2006) Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery 139:140–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Adams S et al (2005) A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre. Ann Surg 242:631–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Forrest D et al (2006) Surgical crisis management skills training and assessment: a simulation[corrected]-based approach to enhancing operating room performance. Ann Surg 244:139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dempere-Marco L, Hu X-P, Yang G-Z (2003) Visual search in chest radiology: definition of reference anatomy for analysing visual search patterns. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IEEE-EMBS Information Technology — Applications in Biomedicine 2003, ITAB 2003, Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leff DR, Aggarwal R, Deligani F et al (2006) Optical mapping of the frontal cortex during a surgical knot-tying task, a feasibility study. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4091:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Poole A (2003) The implications of Modernising Medical Careers for specialist registrars. BMJ 326:s194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aggarwal, R., Darzi, L.A. (2010). Measurement of Surgical Performance for Delivery of a Competency-Based Training Curriculum. In: Athanasiou, T., Debas, H., Darzi, A. (eds) Key Topics in Surgical Research and Methodology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71915-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71915-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics