Advertisement

A UML 2.0 Profile for Architecting B3G Applications

  • Mauro Caporuscio
  • Valerie Issarny
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4401)

Abstract

B3G is an emerging network technology which conceives the convergence of telecommunication and IP-based networks for providing enhanced services able to transfer both voice and non-voice data through wired and wireless networks. Moreover, B3G networks can be no longer considered as “passive” entities which only transport data between end-points, but they must be considered as “active” parties that have their own behavior and provide services. This creates a completely new application domain where applying current software engineering design tools, such as software architectures, fails. In fact, dealing with B3G networks requires to explicit low-level details usually abstracted by the architectural descriptions.

To this extent, we present an ongoing work on investigating B3G-oriented application modeling. In particular, we propose an enhanced UML profile to define and analyze software architectures that explicitly exploit the B3G domain properties.

Keywords

Wireless Local Area Network Software Architecture Short Message Service Service Level Agreement Universal Mobile Telecommunication System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    3rd Generation Partnership Project Technical Specification Group: Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+) - General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) Service Description - Services and System Aspects - Stage 2 (Jan. 2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    3rd Generation Partnership Project Technical Specification Group: Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) - Services and service capabilities (Sept. 2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    3rd Generation Partnership Project Technical Specification Group: Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) - Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) - Quality of Service (QoS) concept and architecture (June 2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balsamo, S., et al.: Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(5), 295–310 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernardo, M., Inverardi, P. (eds.): SFM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2804. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bertolino, A., Inverardi, P.: Architecture-based software testing. In: Joint proceedings of the second international software architecture workshop (ISAW-2) and international workshop on multiple perspectives in software development (Viewpoints ’96) on SIGSOFT ’96 workshops, pp. 62–64. ACM Press, New York (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bluetooth. Bluetooth core specification v2.0, http://www.bluetooth.com
  9. 9.
    Caporuscio, M., Di Marco, A., Inverardi, P.: Model-based system reconfiguration for dynamic performance management. Journal of Systems and Software, to appear (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charmy Project. Charmy web site (February 2004), http://www.di.univaq.it/charmy
  11. 11.
    Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cortellessa, V., et al.: Using uml for sa-based modeling and analysis. In: Proceedings of Int. Workshop on Software Architecture Description & UML, Lisbon, Portugal (Oct. 2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Ruscio, D., et al.: Towards weaving software architecture models. In: Proocedings of the MBD-MOMPES 2006 Workshop, Potsdam, Germany (March 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garlan, D., Shaw, M.: An introduction to software architecture. In: Ambriola, V., Tortora, G. (eds.) Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 1–39. World Scientific, Singapore (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IEEE 802.11 Working Group: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Local Area Networks (WiFi), http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/
  16. 16.
    IEEE 802.3 Working Group: IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD (ETHERNET) based Local Area Networks, http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/
  17. 17.
    Inverardi, P., Muccini, H., Pelliccione, P.: Dually: Putting in synergy UML 2.0 and ADLs. In: Proocedings of Int. 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), Pittsburgh, November 2005, IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ivers, J., et al.: Documenting component and connector views with uml 2.0. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, USA (April 2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Medvidovic, N., et al.: Modeling software architectures in the unified modeling language. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 11(1), 2–57 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering 26(1), 70–93 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moerdijk, A.-J., Klosterman, L.: Opening the Networks with Parlay/OSA: Standards and Aspects Behind the APIs. IEEE Network 17(3), 58–64 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mouly, M., Pautet, M.: Current evolution of the GSM systems. Technical report, IEEE Pers. Commun. (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Network Working Group: The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP). RFC 1661 (July 1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Object Management Group OMG: Unified Modeling Lanauge Specification - UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. OMG Document: formal/05-07-04 (Aug. 2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perry, D.E., Wolf, A.L.: Foundations for the study of software architecture. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 17(4), 40–52 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Plastic Consortium: Providing Lightweight and Adaptable Service Technology for pervasive Information and Communication. IST STREP Project, http://www.ist-plastic.org/
  27. 27.
    Roh, S., Kim, K., Jeon, T.: Architecture modeling language based on uml2.0. In: Proocedings of 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC’04), pp. 663–669 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vieira, M., Richardson, D.: Analyzing dependencies in large component-based systems. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Edinburgh, UK, September 2002, pp. 241–244. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vieira, M., Richardson, D.: The role of dependencies in component-based systems evolution. In: IWPSE ’02: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pp. 62–65. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zahariadis, T., Doshi, B.: Applications and services for the B3G/4G era. IEEE Wireless Communications 11(5) (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauro Caporuscio
    • 1
  • Valerie Issarny
    • 1
  1. 1.INRIA-Rocquencourt, Domaine de Voluceau, 78153 Le ChesnayFrance

Personalised recommendations