Skip to main content

Density Estimation with Genetic Programming for Inverse Problem Solving

  • Conference paper
Genetic Programming (EuroGP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4445))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper addresses the resolution, by Genetic Programming (GP) methods, of ambiguous inverse problems, where for a single input, many outputs can be expected. We propose two approaches to tackle this kind of many-to-one inversion problems, each of them based on the estimation, by a team of predictors, of a probability density of the expected outputs. In the first one, Stochastic Realisation GP, the predictors outputs are considered as the realisations of an unknown random variable which distribution should approach the expected one. The second one, Mixture Density GP, directly models the expected distribution by the mean of a Gaussian mixture model, for which genetic programming has to find the parameters. Encouraging results are obtained on four test problems of different difficulty, exhibiting the interests of such methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bishop, C.M.: Mixture density networks. Technical report, Aston University (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brameier, M., Banzhaf, W.: Evolving teams of predictors with linear genetic programming. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 2(4), 381–407 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chami, M., Robilliard, D.: Inversion of oceanic constituents in case i and case ii waters with genetic programming algorithms. Applied Optics 40(30), 6260–6275 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collet, P., Lutton, E., Raynal, F., Schoenauer, M.: Polar IFS+parisian genetic programming=efficient IFS inverse problem solving. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 1(4), 339–361 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Platel, M.D., Chami, M., Clergue, M., Collard, P.: Teams of genetic predictors for inverse problem solving. In: Keijzer, M., Tettamanzi, A.G.B., Collet, P., van Hemert, J.I., Tomassini, M. (eds.) EuroGP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3447, pp. 341–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jordan, M.I., Rumelhart, D.E.: Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science 16, 307–354 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koza, J.R.: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Morishita, R., Imade, H., Ono, I., Ono, N., Okamoto, M.: Finding multiple solutions based on an evolutionary algorithm for inference of genetic networks by s-system. In: Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC ’03, pp. 615–622 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paris, G., Robilliard, D., Fonlupt, C.: Genetic programming with boosting for ambiguities in regression problems. In: Ryan, C., Soule, T., Keijzer, M., Tsang, E.P.K., Poli, R., Costa, E. (eds.) EuroGP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2610, pp. 183–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Spector, L.: Autoconstructive evolution: Push, pushGP, and pushpop. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO-2001, 7-11 July 2001, pp. 137–146. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Streichert, F., Planatscher, H., Spieth, C., Ulmer, H., Zell, A.: Comparing genetic programming and evolution strategies on inferring gene regulatory networks. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO-2004, Part I, pp. 471–480, Seattle, WA, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tarantola, A.: Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao, X.: Universal approximation by genetic programming. In: Foundations of Genetic Programming, Orlando, Florida, USA, 13 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marc Ebner Michael O’Neill Anikó Ekárt Leonardo Vanneschi Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Defoin Platel, M., Vérel, S., Clergue, M., Chami, M. (2007). Density Estimation with Genetic Programming for Inverse Problem Solving. In: Ebner, M., O’Neill, M., Ekárt, A., Vanneschi, L., Esparcia-Alcázar, A.I. (eds) Genetic Programming. EuroGP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4445. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71605-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71605-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71602-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71605-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics