Skip to main content

A General Principled Method for Image Similarity Validation

  • Conference paper
Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval: User, Context, and Feedback (AMR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4398))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A novel and general criterion for image similarity validation is introduced using the so-called a contrario decision framework. It is mathematically proved that it is possible to compute a fully automatic detection criterion to decide that two images have a common cause, which can be taken as a definition of similarity. Analytical estimates of the necessary and sufficient number of sample points are also given. An implementation of this criterion is designed exploiting the comparison of grey level gradient direction at randomly sampled points. Similar images are detected a contrario, by rejecting an hypothesis that resemblance is due to randomness, which is far more easy to model than a realistic degradation process. The method proves very robust to noise, transparency and partial occlusion. It is also invariant to contrast change and can accomodate global geometric transformations. It does not require any feature matching step. It can be global or local, only the global version is investigated in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brunelli, R., Mich, O., Modena, C.M.: A survey on the automatic indexing of video data. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 10(2), 78–112 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Desolneux, A., Moisan, L., Morel, J.M.: A grouping principle and four applications. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25(4), 508–513 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, vol. I, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM 24(6), 381–395 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Grimson, W.E.L., Huttenlocher, D.P.: On the sensitivity of the Hough transform for object recognition. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12(3), 255–274 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoeffding, W.: Probability inequalities for sum of bounded random variables. J. of the Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 13–30 (1963)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lisani, J.L., et al.: On the theory of planar shape. SIAM Multiscale Mod. and Sim. 1(1), 1–24 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lisani, J.L., Morel, J.M.: Detection of major changes in satellite images. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, ICIP’03, Barcelona, Sept. 2003, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe, D.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, ICCV’99, Corfu, Sept. 1999, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lowe, D.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikolajczyk, K., et al.: A comparison of affine region detectors. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 65(1-2), 43–72 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Odobez, J.M., Bouthemy, P.: Robust multiresolution estimation of parametric motion models. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 6(4), 348–365 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng, J., Yu, B., Wang, D.: Images similarity detection based on directional gradient angular histogram. In: 16th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, ICPR’02, Quebec (August 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rothwell, C.A.: Object Recognition Through Invariant Indexing. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sivic, J., Zisserman, A.: Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, ICCV’03, Nice, Oct.  2003, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smeulders, A.W.M., et al.: Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(12), 1349–1380 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Venot, A., Lebruchec, J.F., Roucayrol, J.C.: A new class of similarity measures for robust image registration. Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing 28, 176–184 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Veit, T., Cao, F., Bouthemy, P.: Probabilistic parameter-free motion detection. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR’04, Washington D.C, June  2004, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stéphane Marchand-Maillet Eric Bruno Andreas Nürnberger Marcin Detyniecki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cao, F., Bouthemy, P. (2007). A General Principled Method for Image Similarity Validation. In: Marchand-Maillet, S., Bruno, E., Nürnberger, A., Detyniecki, M. (eds) Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval: User, Context, and Feedback. AMR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4398. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71545-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71545-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71544-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71545-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics