Skip to main content

Evaluating Volatility and Correlation Forecasts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Financial Time Series

Abstract

This chapter considers the problems of evaluation and comparison of volatility forecasts, both univariate (variance) and multivariate (covariance matrix and/or correlation). We pay explicit attention to the fact that the object of interest in these applications is unobservable, even ex post, and so the evaluation and comparison of volatility forecasts often rely on the use of a “volatility proxy”, i.e. an observable variable that is related to the latent variable of interest. We focus on methods that are robust to the presence of measurement error in the volatility proxy, and to the conditional distribution of returns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen, T.G. and Bollerslev, T. (1998): Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review 39, 885–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.G., Benzoni, L. and Lund, J. (2002): An empirical investigation of continuous-time equity return models. Journal of Finance 57, 1239–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Labys, P. (2003): Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility. Econometrica 71, 3–29.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T. and Meddahi, N. (2005): Correcting the errors: Volatility forecast evaluation using high-frequency data and realized volatilities. Econometrica 73, 279–296.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Christoffersen, P.F. and Diebold, F.X. (2006a): Volatility and correlation forecasting. In: Elliott G., Granger C., Timmermann A. (Eds.): Handbook of Economic Forecasting. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T. and Diebold, F.X. (2006b): Parametric and nonparametric volatility measurement. In: Hansen L.P., Aït-Sahalia Y. (Eds.): Handbook of Financial Econometrics, forthcoming. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M. (2003): Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E. and Shephard, N. (2004): Econometric analysis of realised covariation: high frequency based covariance, regression and correlation in financial economics. Econometrica 73, 885–925.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D.S. (2003): Empirical option pricing: a retrospection. Journal of Econometrics 116, 387–404.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bierens, H.J. (1990): A consistent conditional moment test of functional form. Econometrica 58, 1443–1458.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bierens, H.J. and Ploberger, W. (1997): Asymptotic theory of integrated conditional moment tests. Econometrica 65, 1129–1152.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. and Wright, J.H. (2001): High-frequency data, frequency domain inference, and volatility forecasting. The Review of Economics and Statistics 83, 596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T., Engle, R.F. and Wooldridge, J.M. (1988): A capital asset pricing model with time-varying covariances. Journal of Political Economy 96, 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., Lo, A.W. and MacKinlay, A.C. (1997): The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chernov, M. (2007): On the role of risk premia in volatility forecasting. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernov, M., Gallant, A.R., Ghysels, E. and Tauchen, G. (2003): Alternative models for stock price dynamics. Journal of Econometrics 116, 225–257.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chib, T. (2008): Multivariate stochastic volatility. In: Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.-P. and Mikosch, T. (Eds.): Handbook of Financial Time Series, 365–400. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K. and Podolskij, M. (2006): Realized range-based estimation of integrated variance. Journal of Econometrics forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis, G.A. and Satchell, S.E. (2004): Forecast evaluation in the presence of unobserved volatility. Econometric Reviews 23, 175–198.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P. (2008): Estimation of value-at-risk. In: Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.-P. and Mikosch, T. (Eds.): Handbook of Financial Time Series, 752–766. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P.F. and Jacobs, K. (2004a): The importance of the loss function in option valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 72, 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P.F. and Jacobs, K. (2004b): Which Garch model for option valuation? Management Science 50, 1204–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F.X. and Mariano, R.S. (1995): Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F. and Colacito, R. (2006): Testing and valuing dynamic correlations for asset allocation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 24, 238–253.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R.F. and Manganelli, S. (2004): Caviar: conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 22, 367–381.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M.A. and Lopez, J.A. (2005): Evaluating interest rate covariance models within a value-at-risk framework. Journal of Financial Econometrics 3, 126–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., Kirby, C. and Ostdiek, B. (2003): The economic value of volatility timing using “realized” volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 67, 473–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., Ghysels, E. and Renault, E. (2008): The econometrics of option pricing. In: Aït-Sahalia Y., Hansen L.P. (Eds.): Handbook of Financial Econometrics, forthcoming. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacomini, R. and White, H. (2006): Tests of conditional predictive ability. Econometrica 74, 1545–1578.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, M.S. and Boyer, B.H. (1997): Evaluating forecasts of correlation using option pricing, board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, S. and Meddahi, N. (2005): Bootstrapping realized volatility, Département de Sciences Économiques, CIREQ and CIRANO Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonźalez-Rivera, G., Lee, T.H. and Mishra, S. (2004): Forecasting volatility: A reality check based on option pricing, utility function, value-at-risk, and predictive likelihood. International Journal of Forecasting 20, 629–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.E. and Oomen, R.C. (2006): Covariance measurement in the presence of non-synchronous trading and market microstructure noise. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R. (2005): A test for superior predictive ability. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 23, 365–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R. and Lunde, A. (2005): A forecast comparison of volatility models: does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)? Journal of Applied Econometrics 20, 873–889.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R. and Lunde, A. (2006a): Consistent ranking of volatility models. Journal of Econometrics 127, 97–121.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R. and Lunde, A. (2006b): Realized variance and market microstructure noise. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 24, 127–218.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R., Lunde, A. and Nason, J.M. (2005): Model confidence sets for forecasting models, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A., Ruiz, E. and Shephard, N. (1994): Multivariate stochastic variance models. Review of Economic Studies 61, 247–264.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, F. (2000): Econometrics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, R.M. (1996): The Bierens test under data dependence. Journal of Econometrics 72, 1–32.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (1995): Predicting volatility in the foreign exchange market. Journal of Finance 50, 507–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, S.J. (2008): Parameter estimation and practical aspects of modelling stochastic volatility. In: Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.-P. and Mikosch, T. (Eds.): Handbook of Financial Time Series, 312–344. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuester, K., Mittnik, S. and Paolella, M.S. (2006): Value-at-Risk Prediction: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies. Journal of Financial Econometrics 4, 53–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, J.A. (2001): Evaluating the predictive accuracy of volatility models. Journal of Forecasting 20, 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J.R. and Neudecker, H. (2002): Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquering, W. and Verbeek, M. (2004): The economic value of predicting stock index returns and volatility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39, 407–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meddahi, N. (2001): A theoretical comparison between integrated and realized volatilities. Manuscript, Département de Sciences Économiques, CIREQ and CIRANO Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. and Zarnowitz, V. (1969): The evaluation of economic forecasts. In: Mincer J. (Ed.): Economic Forecasts and Expectations. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W.K. and West, K.D. (1987): A simple, positive definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55, 703–708.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Noh, J., Engle, R.F. and Kane, A. (1994): Forecasting volatility and option prices of the S&P 500 index. Journal of Derivatives 2, 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, M. (1980): The extreme value method for estimating the variance of the rate of return. The Journal of Business 53, 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, A.J. (2006): Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, Research Paper 175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, K. (2006): Realized covariance and scrambling Univeristy of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvennoinen, A., Teräsvirta, T. (2008): Multivariate Garch models. In: Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.-P. and Mikosch, T. (Eds.): Handbook of Financial Time Series, 201–229. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T. (2008): An introduction to univariate GARCH. In: Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.-P. and Mikosch, T. (Eds.): Handbook of Financial Time Series, 17–42. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1958): Economic Forecasts and Policy. North-Holland, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, Y.K. (2000): A test for constant correlations in a multivariate GARCH model. Journal of Econometrics 98, 107–127.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • West, K.D. (1996): Asymptotic inference about predictive ability. Econometrica 64, 1067–1084.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • West, K.D. (2006): Forecast evaluation. In: Elliott G., Granger C., Timmermann A. (Eds.): Handbook of Economic Forecasting. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, K.D., Edison, H.J. and Cho, D. (1993): A utility-based comparison of some models of exchange rate volatility. Journal of International Economics 35, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980): A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817–838.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1996): Estimation, Inference and Specification Analysis. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (2000): A reality check for data snooping. Econometrica 68, 1097–1126.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zivot, E. (2008): Practical aspects of Garch-modelling. In: Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.-P. and Mikosch, T. (Eds.): Handbook of Financial Time Series, 112–155. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrew J. Patton or Kevin Sheppard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patton, A.J., Sheppard, K. (2009). Evaluating Volatility and Correlation Forecasts. In: Mikosch, T., Kreiß, JP., Davis, R., Andersen, T. (eds) Handbook of Financial Time Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71297-8_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics