Abstract
We consider the simplest possible but nontrivial problem of particle mechanics : on an interval, say [0,1], we consider two particles of the same mass that oscillate. They move about at constant velocity unless there is a collision, either at an endpoint or in encountering each other. The conditions in case of collision are these: when the particle on the left encounters the wall on the left at 0, it rebounds with the same speed and of course in the opposite direction; likewise when the particle on the right rebounds from the wall on the right at the point 1. When they encounter each other (with opposed directions) the condition is what is called an elastic collision, physically one where, after the deformation caused by the collision, the two solids reassume their shapes and retain their combined kinetic energy and momentum. It can be shown that the particles emerge in the opposite directions, but exchange their velocities. The well known and spectacular case is where one is fixed; then the other remains fixed at the point of contact while the first leaves with the same velocity as the particle that hit it. If they encounter each other while going the same direction the result is still the same: the particles exchange their velocities; the particle that was moving faster loses speed to the benefit of the other. The fundamental problem is to describe this simultaneous movement of the two particles over time, but especially when things continue indefinitely or at least for a long period of time. This consideration of infinity is natural in physics when the particles are excited with extremely large velocities and where extremely many collisions occur in a short time interval. In particular, will the motion ultimately be periodic or, to the contrary, will the particles ultimately occupy practically all possible positions?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
[B] Berger, M. (1987, 2009) Geometry I, II. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
[BG] Berger, M., & Gostiaux, B. (1987) Differential Geometry: Manifolds, Curves and Surfaces. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
Anosov, D., & Arnold, V. (Eds.). (1988). Dynamical systems I. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
Arnold, V., & Avez, A. (1967). Problèmes ergodiques de la mécaniqueclassique. Paris: Gauthier-Villars
Arnoux, P. (1988). Ergodicité générique des billards polygonaux, Séminaire Bourbaki 1987–1988. In Astérique 161–162, Société mathématique de France, 203–222
Baryshnikov, Y. (1995). Complexity of trajectories in rectangular billiards. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 174, 43–56
Berger, M. (1991). Les billiards mathématiques. Pour la Science 163, mai 1991, 76–85
Berger, M. (1995). Seules lesquadriques admettent des caustiques. Bulletin de laSociété MathÈmatique de France, 123, 107–116
Berger, M. (1999).Riemannian geometry during the second half of the twentiethcentury. Providence: American Mathematical Society
Berger, M. (2000a). Encounterwith a geometer I, II. Notices of the American MathematicalSociety, 47(2), 47(3), 183–194, 326–340
Berger, M. (2003). Apanoramic introduction to Riemannian geometry. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
Boshernitzan, M., Galperin, G., Krüger, T., & Troubetzkoy, S.(1998). Periodic billiard orbits are dense in rational polygons. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 350, 3523–3535
Cipran, B., Hanson, R., & Kolan, A. (1995). Periodic trajectories in right trianglebilliards. Physical Review, E52(3), 2066–2071
Damour, T., De Buyl, S., Henneaux, M., & Schomblond, C. (2002). Einsteinbilliards and overextensions of finite-dimensional simple Liealgebras. Journal of High Energy Physics, 8, 2002
Dogru, F., &Tabachnikov, S. (2002). On polygonal dual billiards in thehyperbolic plane. Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, 8, 67–82
Douady, R. (1982). Applications du théorème des tores invariants.Thèse Paris VII 1982
Eskin, A., & Masur, H. 2001). Asymptotic formulas on flat surfaces. Ergodic Theory andDynamical Systems, 21, 443–478
Galperin, G. (1983). Non-periodic and not everywhere dense billiard trajectories inconvex polygons and polyhedrons. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, 91, 187–211
Galperin, G., & Zemlyakov, A. (1990). Mathematical billiards (in Russian)
Gardner, M. (1984). Bounding balls in polygons and polyhedrons. In Gardner, M. (Ed.),The sixth book of mathematical games from Scientific American (pp. 29–38, 211–214). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Ghomi, M. (2004). Shortestperiodic billiard trajectories in convex bodies. Geometricand Functional Analysis, 14, 295–302
Gromov, M. (1999a).Metric structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian spaces, J. Lafontaine & P. Pansu (Eds.), Basel: Birkhäuser
Gruber, P. (1990). Convexbilliards. Geometriae Dedicata, 33, 205–226
Gruber, P. (1994). Onlyellipsoids have caustics. Mathematische Annalen, 303, 185–194
Gruber, P., & Wills, J.(Eds.). (1993). Handbook of convex geometry. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Gutkin, E. (1984). Billiardson almost integrable polyhedral surfaces. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 4, 569–584
Gutkin, E. (1996). Billiardsin polygons: survey of recent results. Journal of Statistical Physics, 83, 7–26
Gutkin, E. (2003). Extremaltriangles for a triple of concentric circles. Preprint IHES, M03-46
Gutkin, E., &Tabachnikov, S. (2002). Billiards in Finsler and Minkovskigeometries. Journal of Geometry and Physics, 40, 277–301
Gutkin, E., &Troubetzkoy, S. (1996). Directional flows and strong recurrence for polygonal billiards. International Conference on DynamicalSystems (Montevideo, 1995), Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser., 362, Longman: Harlow, 21–45
Hadamard, J. (1898). Surle billard non-euclidien. Proc. verb. soc. sci. phys. etnat. Bordeaux, 5 mai
Halpern, B. (1977). Strangebilliards tables. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 232, 297–305
Hubert, P. (1995). Complexité des suites définies par des billards rationnels. Bulletin de la Société MathÈmatique de France,123, 257–270
Katok, A. (1987). The growthrate of singular and periodic orbits for a polygonal billiard. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 111, 151–160
Katok, A., &Hasselblatt, B. (1995). Introduction to the modern theory ofdynamical systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Katok, A., & Strelcyn, J.-M. (1986). Invariant manifolds, entropy and billiards, smooth maps with singularities. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
Kerckhoff, S., Masur, H., & Smillie, J. (1986). Ergodicity of billiards flows and quadratic differentials. Annals of Mathematics, 124, 293–311
Lazutkin, V. (1993).KAM theory and semiclassical approximations toeigenfunctions. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
Mané, R. (1987).Ergodic theory and differentiable dynamics. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
Marmi, S. (2000). Chaoticbehavior in the solar system, Séminaire Bourbaki(1998–1999). Astérisque, 266, 113–136
Masur, H. (1990). The growthrate of trajectories of a quadratic differential. ErgodicTheory and Dynamical Systems, 10, 151–176
Masur, H., &Tabachnikov, S. (2002). Rational billiards and flat structures. In H. A. Katok (Ed.), Handbook of dynamical systems (pp. 1015–1089) Amsterdam: Elsevier
Mather, J. (1982). Glancingbilliards. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 2, 397–403
Morse, M., & Hedlund, G.(1940). Symbolic dynamics 2, Sturmian trajectories. AmericanJournal of Mathematics, 62, 1–42
Moser, J. (1978). Is the solarsystem stable? The Mathematical Intelligencer, 1, 65–71
Porter, M., & Lansel, S.(2006). Mushroom Billiards, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 53, 334–337
Sarnak, P. (1995). Arithmetic Quantum Chaos. In The schur lectures (Tel-Aviv 1992), Israel Mathematics Conference Proceedings, 8, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Isral, 183–236
Schwartz, R. (2006a).Near isosceles billiards: scaling limits and fourierseries. http://www.math.brown.edu/∼res/Billiards/index.html
Schwartz, R. (2006b). Obtuse triangle billiards II:100 degrees worth of periodic trajectories. Experimental Mathematics, 18, 137–171
Schwartz, R. (2006c). Obtuse triangle billiards I: near the.2; 3; 6/ triangle. Experimental Mathematics, 15, 161–182
Sinaï, Y. (1976).Introduction to ergodic theory, Math. notes 18. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Sinaï, Y. (Ed.).(1987). Dynamicals systems II, encyclopaedia of mathematicalsciences (Vol. 2). Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
Sinaï, Y. (1990). Hyperbolic billiards. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Kyoto 1990, Springer, 249–260
Stenman, F. (1975). Periodic orbits in a tetrahedral mirror. Commentationes Physico-Mathematicae, 45, 103–110
Tabachnikov, S.(1995). Billiards. Paris: Société mathématiquede France
Tabachnikov, S.(2002). Dual billiards in the hyperbolic plane. Nonlinearity, 15, 1051–1072
Tabachnikov, S. (2005). Geometry and Billiards, AMS Student Mathematical Studies (Vol. 30). Providence: American Mathematical Society
Ulam, S. (1976).Adventures of a mathematician. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons
Veech, W. (1992). The billiardin a regular polygon. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 2, 341–379
Walters, P. (1982).An introduction to ergodic theory. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer
Wojtkowski, M.(1986). Principles for the design of billiards with nonvanishing Lyapunov exponents. Communications in Mathematical Physics,105, 391–414
Zagier, D. (1977). The first 50 millions prime numbers. The Mathematical Intelligencer,0, 7–19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berger, M. (2010). Geometry and dynamics I: billiards. In: Geometry Revealed. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70997-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70997-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70996-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70997-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)