Skip to main content

Case-Sensitivity of Classifiers for WSD: Complex Systems Disambiguate Tough Words Better

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2007)

Abstract

We present a novel method for improving disambiguation accuracy by building an optimal ensemble (OE) of systems where we predict the best available system for target word using a priori case factors (e.g. amount of training per sense). We report promising results of a series of best-system prediction tests (best prediction accuracy is 0.92) and show that complex/simple systems disambiguate tough/easy words better. The method provides the following benefits: (1) higher disambiguation accuracy for virtually any base systems (current best OE yields close to 2% accuracy gain over Senseval-3 state of the art) and (2) economical way of building more effective ensembles of all types (e.g. optimal, weighted voting and cross-validation based). The method is also highly scalable in that it utilizes readily available factors available for any ambiguous word in any language for estimating word difficulty and defines classifier complexity using known properties only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aha, D.W.: Generalizing from case studies: A case study. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aha, D., Kibler, D.: Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning 6, 37–66 (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bay, S.D., Pazzani, M.J.: Characterizing model errors and differences. In: 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edmonds, P., Kilgarriff, A.: Introduction to the Special Issue on evaluating word sense disambiguation programs. Journal of Natural Language Engineering 8(4) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Forman, G., Cohen, I.: Learning from Little: Comparison of Classifiers Given Little Training. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) ECML 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3201, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoste, V., Hendrickx, I., Daelemans, W., van den Bosch, A.: Parameter optimization for machine-learning of word sense disambiguation. Journal of Natural Language Engineering 8(4), 311–327 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. John, G., Langley, P.: Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Legrand, S., Pulido, J.G.R.: A Hybrid Approach to Word Sense Disambiguation: Neural Clustering with Class Labeling. In: Knowledge Discovery and Ontologies workshop at 15th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, F., Khan, L., Bastani, F., Yen, I.-L., Zhou, J.A.: dynamically growing self-organizing tree (DGSOT) for hierarchical clustering gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics 20(16), 2605–2617 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manning, C., Tolga Ilhan, H., Kamvar, S., Klein, D., Toutanova, K.: Combining Heterogeneous Classifiers for Word-Sense Disambiguation. In: Proceedings of SENSEVAL-2, Second International Workshop on Evaluating WSD Systems, pp. 87–90 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T.: YALE: Rapid Prototyping for Complex Data Mining Tasks. In: Proceedings of 12th ACM SIGKDD, ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mihalcea, R.: Word sense disambiguation with pattern learning and automatic feature selection. Journal of Natural Language Engineering 8(4), 343–359 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mihalcea, R., Kilgarriff, A., Chklovski, T.: The SENSEVAL-3 English lexical sample task. In: Proceedings of SENSEVAL-3 Workshop at ACL (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pedersen, T.: Assessing System Agreement and Instance Difficulty in the Lexical Sample Tasks of SENSEVAL-2. In: Proceedings of the SIGLEX/SENSEVAL Workshop on Word Sense Disambiguation (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen, T.: Machine learning with lexical features: The Duluth approach to Senseval. In: Proceedings of the Senseval-2 Workshop (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quinlan, R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saarikoski, H., Legrand, S.: Building an Optimal WSD Ensemble Using Per-Word Selection of Best System. In: Martínez-Trinidad, J.F., Carrasco Ochoa, J.A., Kittler, J. (eds.) CIARP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4225, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seo, H-C., Rim, H-C., Kim, S-H.: KUNLP system in Senseval-3. In: Proceedings of SENSEVAL-2 Workshop, pp. 222–225 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vapnik, V.N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Witten, I., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yarowsky, D., Cucerzan, S., Florian, R., Schafer, C., Wicentowski, R.: The Johns Hopkins SENSEVAL2 System Descriptions. In: Proceedings of SENSEVAL-2 workshop (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yarowsky, D., Florian, R.: Evaluating sense disambiguation across diverse parameter spaces. Journal of Natural Language Engineering 8(4), 293–311 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alexander Gelbukh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saarikoski, H.M.T., Legrand, S., Gelbukh, A. (2007). Case-Sensitivity of Classifiers for WSD: Complex Systems Disambiguate Tough Words Better. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70939-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70939-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70938-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70939-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics