Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some Conjectures on the Tie Between Digital Divide and Regional Disparities

  • Chapter
Growth and Innovation of Competitive Regions

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 899 Accesses

In the mid-1980s there was much debate on the impact of information and communication technologies (ICTs) on productivity. The famous words of Robert Solow (1987) summarized the view of most skeptics: “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.” In other words, according to Solow, there was no empirical evidence from the existing data that ICTs were generating productivity gains, but many firms were devoting considerable resources to ICT investment at the same time. This was known in the literature as the Solow paradox or productivity paradox. Many studies showed that ICTs contributed very little to productivity growth in the 1980s and in the early 1990s. Roach (1991) analyzed the productivity of white- and blue-collar workers between the mid-1970s and the mid-1980s. He showed that output per blue-collar worker grew by 16.9% between the mid-1970s and the mid-1980s, while output per white-collar worker, who mainly benefited from strong investment in ICTs, decreased by 6.6%. Loveman (1990) studied the impact of ICTs on the productivity of 60 business units estimating a production function by ordinary least squares. He showed that the contribution of ICT capital to output was approximately zero over the 5 year period studied in almost every subsample he examined. Barua, Kriebel and Mukhopadhyay (1991) found that there is a link between ICTs and intermediate indicators of productivity performance but not between ICTs and productivity. Morrison and Berndt (1990) using data from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis found evidence that every dollar spent on ICT in the manufacturing sector, delivered only about $0.80 of value on the margin, indicating general over-investment in ICT. Cron and Sobol (1983) studied the wholesale sector. They found no ICT impact on productivity even though they show that ICT use increases the variance of the performance, seeming to suggest that ICT adoption favors well-organized firms and damages the others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alderighi M, Biagi F, Riggi M (2005) Growth, information and communication technologies and regional disparities: a review of theory and evidence. mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelsman EJ, Doms M (2000) Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata. J Econ Lit 38:569–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron DP, Myerson RB (1982) Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs. Econometrica 50:911–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua A, Kriebel C, Mukhopadhyay T (1991) Information technology and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Inf Syst Res 6:3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman EM, Feser EJ, Kaufmann A (1999) Lean production systems in regions: conceptual and measurement requirements. Ann Reg Sci 33:389–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj A, Bharadwaj S, Konsynski B (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Manag Sci 45:1008–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bore A (2003) Recommendation, Official Journal of the European Union, 10 April 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Manag Sci 42:541–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J Econ Perspect 14:23–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Computing productivity: firm-level evidence. Rev Econ Stat 85(4):793–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Yang S (2001) Intangible assets and growth accounting: evidence from computer investments. mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Card D, DiNardo JE (2002) Skill biased technological change and rising wage inequalities: some problems and puzzles. NBER working paper, 8769. J Labor Econ 20(4):733–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun H (2003) Information technology and the demand for educated workers: disentangling the impacts of adoption versus use. Rev Econ Stat 85:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colecchia A, Schreyer P (2002) ICT investment and economic growth in the 1990s: is the United States a unique case? Rev Econ Dyn 5:408–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cron WL, Sobol MG (1983) The relationship between computerization and performance: a strategy for maximizing the economic benefits of computerization. J Inf Manag 6:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David P, Wright G (1999) General purpose technologies and surges in productivity: historical reflections on the future of the ICT revolution. mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Enterprise DG (2003) 2003 European innovation Scoreboard: technical paper No 3, Regional innovation performances. Available online at: http://trendchart.cordis.lu/

  • Davis G, Collins R, Eierman M, Nance W (1993) Productivity from information technology investment in knowledge work. In: Barker R, Kauffman R, Mahmood (eds.) Strategic information technology management. IDEA Group, Harrisburg, PA, pp. 327–343

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) Presidency conclusions. Lisbon European Council, March 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Forth J, Mason G (2004) Information and communication technology (ICT) skill gaps and company-level performance: evidence from the ICT professionals survey 2000–01. National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR, London), Discussion Paper No. 236

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratesi U, Riggi M (2007) Does migration reduce regional disparities? The role of skill-selective flows. Rev Urban Region Dev Stud 19:78–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gera S, Gu W, Lee F (1999) Information technology and productivity growth: an empirical analysis for Canada and the United States. Can J Econ 32(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon RJ (2000) Does the new economy measure up to the great inventions of the past? J Econ Perspect 14:49–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Terasvirta T (1993) Modelling nonlinear economic relationships. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood J, Yorokoglu M (1997) 1974. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 46:49–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie R, Laffont JJ (1984) A complete solution to a class of principal-agent problems with an application to the control of a self-managed firm. J Pub Econ 25:329–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Stiroh KJ (1999) Information technology and growth. Am Econ Rev 89:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Stiroh KJ (2000a) U.S. economic growth at the industry level. Am Econ Rev 90:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Stiroh KJ (2000b) Raising the speed limit: U.S. economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2000(1): 125–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn JA, Lim J (1998) Skilled labor-augmenting technical progress in US manufacturing, Q J Econ 113:1281–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien MI, Schwartz NI (1991) Dynamic optimization, the calculus of variations and optimal control in economics and management. North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur R, Rapoport H (2005) Migration selectivity and the evolution of spatial inequality. J Econ Geogr 5(1):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofman F, Lawarrée J (1996) Collusion in hierarchical agency. Econometrica 6:629–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer M (1993) The O-Ring theory of economic development. Q J Econ 108:551–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1993) A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehr W, Lichtenberg F (1999) Information technology and its impact on firm-level productivity: evidence from government and private data sources, 1977–1995. Can J Econ 32(2):335–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveman G (1990) An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA. mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin P (1998) Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe? World Econ 21:757–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin P (1999) Are European regional policies delivering? CERAS-ENPC, Université de lille-1, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehmet J (1998) The information technology productivity paradox. Rev Econ Dyn 1:551–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees J (1971) An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Rev Econ Stud 38:175–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison CJ, Berndt ER (1990) Assessing the productivity of information technology equipment in the U.S. manufacturing industries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3582. RESTAT 79(3):471–481

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony M, Robinson C, Vecchi M (2003) The impact of ICT on the demand for skilled labour: a cross-country comparison. mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003) ICT and Economic Growth, Evidence from OECD countries, industries and firms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliner S, Sichel D, (1994), Computers and output growth revisited: how big is the puzzle?, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomics 25(1994-2):273–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliner S, Sichel D (2000) The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: is information technology the story? J Econ Perspect 14:3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rényi A (1959) A measure of dependence. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 10:441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach SS (1991) Services under siege — The restructuring imperative. Harv Bus Rev 69(5):82–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel D (1994) The impact of technological change on employment and wages: evidence from a firm-level survey of Long Island manufacturers. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review 12:36, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Triplett JE (1999) The Solow productivity paradox: what do computers do to productivity? Can J Econ 32: 309–334

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ark B, Inklaar R, McGuckin RH (2002a) Changing gear: productivity, ICT and services industries: Europe and the United States. The Conference Board, Economics Program, EPWP #02-02

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ark J, Melka BJ, Mulder N, Timmer M, Ypma G (2002b) ICT investments and growth accounts for the European Union, 1980–2000. Groningen Growth and Development Centre, GGDC Research memorandum GD-56

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff EN (1999) The productivity paradox: evidence from indirect indicators of service sector productivity growth. Can J Econ 32:281–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università della Valle d’Aosta, Aosta

    Marco Alderighi (Assistant Professor of Economics)

Authors
  1. Marco Alderighi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milano, Italy

    Ugo Fratesi

  2. Università Bocconi, Via Roentgen, 1, 20136, Milano, Italy

    Lanfranco Senn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alderighi, M. (2009). Some Conjectures on the Tie Between Digital Divide and Regional Disparities. In: Fratesi, U., Senn, L. (eds) Growth and Innovation of Competitive Regions. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70924-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation