Skip to main content
  • 42k Accesses

Abstract

The Arthur Andersen auditing firm was founded in 1913 by an accounting professor of the same name. After Mr. Andersen’s death in 1947, the firm found itself on the verge of collapse. But in the end it was saved thanks to the efforts of Leonard Spacek, who convinced partners to remain together despite looming uncertainty. Spacek, who was Andersen’s chief executive from 1947 to 1963, had the reputation of being the “conscience” of the auditing profession (Norris 2002a). He was among the first to warn that the auditing profession’s very existence could be put in danger if it did not show sufficient independence from clients. He also complained whenever the US Accounting Principles Board yielded too quickly to pressure from companies which thought that auditing rules would significantly reduce profits. Spacek always insisted that Andersen provide above all high-quality accounting, in accordance with its corporate motto, “Think straight. Talk straight”.

Published in: Sison, A.: The Moral Capital of Leaders. Why Virtue Matters, Edward Elgar, 2003, pp. 120–129. Copyright @ Edward Elgar. Reprinted by permission of Edward Elgar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen (2002a), ‘Volcker names Independent Oversight Board’, www.andersen.com, 27 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen (2002b), ‘Updated analysis on the Justice indictment of Andersen: The government’s factual and legal errors’, www.andersen.com, 15 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen (2002c), ‘Volcker outlines framework for a ‘New Andersen’ with governing board’, www.andersen.com, 22 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen (2002d), ‘KPMG, Consulting Inc. Sings Letter of Intent to Acquire Andersen’s Global Consulting Practices’, www.andersen.com, 8 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J. (2002), ‘Accounting For Bad Accounting’, Multinational Monitor, January/February, Vol. 23, Numbers 1&2.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2001), ‘Leading the cause’, 3 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002a), ‘Arthur Andersen Is Said to Be Near a Sale to a Rival’, The New York Times, 11 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002b), ‘Andersen Is Said to Rule Out Plea’, The New York Times, 14 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002c), ‘Andersen is Charged With Obstruction in Enron Inquiry’, The New York Times, 15 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002d), ‘Volcker’s Plan for Andersen Is a Long Shot’, The New York Times, 24 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002e), ‘Andersen Chief Says He Resigned to Aid Workers’, The New York Times, 28 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002f), Andersen Dealt Another Setback as Talks Over Civil Case Stall’, The New York Times, 30 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002g), ‘Deferral Talk Reported in Andersen Case’, The New York Times, 2 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002h), ‘A Guilty Plea From Andersen’s Enron Auditor’, The New York Times, 10 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002i), ‘A Handicapper’s Guide to the Trial of Andersen’, The New York Times, 5 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002j), Judge’s Ruling on Andersen Hurts Defense’, The New York Times, 15 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. (2002k), ‘Andersen Guilty in Effort to Block Inquiry on Enron’, The New York Times, 16 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K and A. Ross Sorkin (2002), ‘Andersen Widens Effort to Find Buyer’, The New York Times, 13 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillers, S. (2002), ‘The Flaw in the Andersen Verdict’, The New York Times, 18 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. (2001), ‘As Andersen’s Overseer, Volcker Won’t Settle for Nominal Change’, The New York Times, 26 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. (2002a), ‘No Rich Route for Partners in a Merger by Andersen’, The New York Times, 13 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. (2002b), ‘Longtime Clients Abandon Andersen’, The New York Times, 16 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. (2002c), ‘Former Fed Chief Outlines Proposal to Save Andersen’, The New York Times, 23 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. (2002d), ‘Andersen to Lay Off 7,000 in Sale to Deloitte’, The New York Times, 5 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. (2002e), ‘Half of Jury Began Deliberations Backing Andersen, but Support Gradually Eroded’, The New York Times, 16 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. and M. Brick (2002), ‘If Firm Stands Still, It May Lose Ground’, The New York Times, 15 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glater, J. and J. Schwartz (2002), ‘Andersen Chief Quits in Effort to Rescue Firm’, The New York Times, 27 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. (2002a), ‘Demise of Andersen Would Leave a Dent in the Industry’, The New York Times, 11 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. (2002b), ‘Execution Before Trial for Andersen’, The New York Times, 15 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New York Times (2002), ‘Andersen’s Ex-Partners Sue’, The New York Times, 25 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2002a), ‘Andersen Crew Baffled but Happy for Hugs’, The New York Times, 15 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2002b), ‘Sense of Loyalty Keeps Many at Auditing Firm Focused’, The New York Times, 16 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2002c), ‘Arthur Andersen Employees Circle the Wagons’, The New York Times, 22 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2002d), ‘Andersen’s Retired Partners Fear Benefits May Slip Away’, The New York Times, 3 April.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sison, A. (2007). Andersen. No Fairy Tale Ending. In: Zimmerli, W.C., Holzinger, M., Richter, K. (eds) Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics