Abstract
Can the participation of civil society actors improve the planning and management of re-development and regeneration schemes? Can such participation mobilise social capital in ways that complement the provision of political and financial capital to achieve successful outcomes? Or does more civil society participation impede the management and implementation of complex schemes? Before tackling these questions, they have to be contextualised in the much broader socio-political shifts in the triangular interaction of the state, business, and civil societies. Traditional centralised decision making and implementation of urban and local economic planning are being replaced by new schemes of governance spreading from the ‘Anglo-Saxon’ societies of North American and the United Kingdom through Western Europe. It could even be claimed that, in some domains, governance through polyarchy is supplanting either the monopolistic authority of state and local government or, in other cases, narrower, ‘corporatist’/social partnership triads of government, business, and trade unions. The EU is in the process of adding ‘civic partners’ to its conventional reliance upon governance through the social partners of labour and capital (Frazer, 2005). Business involvement in redevelopment is not new but now its role is changing; from that of contractor or adviser to more active funding, planning, and management of schemes. Such business involvement has a much longer pedigree in the United States (Reushcke, 2004). However, since its adoption by the neo-liberal, Thatcherite and ‘third way’, New Labour governments in Britain, it has been augmented by policies for inclusion of ‘communities’ and civil society associations to help reverse the decline of both urban economies and social vitality. A pragmatic, efficient case for the direct involvement of business in financing or management of redevelopment schemes can easily be made. However, the participation of community and civil society groups is more difficult to define and justify.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Borocz, J. (2000). Informality rules. East European Politics and Societies, 14(2), 348–380.
Di Gaetano, A., & Strom, E. (2003). Comparative urban governance: an integrated approach. Urban Affairs Review, 38.
Frazer, H. (2005). Setting the scene Europe-wide, the challenge of poverty and social exclusion. Community Development Journal, 40, 4.
Grimshaw, D. P., Vincent, S., & Wilmot, H. (2002). Going privately: Partnership and outsourcing of public sector services. Public Administration, 80, 3.
Hague, C. (2006). Some reflections on approaches to Urban Regeneration. paper to the CoUrbIT Workshop, Krakow, 15 December 2006.
Hirst, P. (2002). Renewing democracy through associations. Political Quarterly, 73(4), 409–421.
Hodgson, L. (2004). Manufactured civil society: counting the cost. Critical Social Policy, 24(2), 139–164.
Jones, P. S. (2003). ‘Urban regeneration’s poisoned chalice: Is there an impasse in (Community) participation-based policy? Urban Studies, 40, 3.
Kuti, E. (1999). Different Eastern European countries at different crossroads. Voluntas, 10, 1.
Mackintosh, M. (1992). Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation. Local Economy, 7, 210–225.
Pretty, J. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23, 8.
Regéczi, D. (2005). Limited partnership: The lack of sustainable development in relation to participation in Hungarian public-private partnerships. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 205–215.
Rupnik, J. (1999). The post communist divide. Journal of Democracy, 10(1), 57–62.
Vercseg, I. (2003). Central and Eastern Europe in the limelight. Community Development Journal, 40, 4.
Vercseg, I. (2004). The Budapest declaration: Building European civil society through community development. Community Development Journal, 39(4), 423–429.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, B. (2009). Participation and the Socio-Political Foundations of the Management of Urban Redevelopments. In: Globalization and Urban Implosion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70512-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70512-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70511-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70512-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)