Skip to main content

Semantic Integration of Identity Data Repositories

  • Conference paper
Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS)

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

  • 687 Accesses

Abstract

With the continuously growing number of distributed and heterogeneous IT systems there is the need for structured and efficient identity management (IdM) processes. This implies that new users are created once and then the information is distributed to all applicable software systems same as if changes on existing user objects occur. The central issue is that there is no generally accepted standard for handling this information distribution because each system has its own internal representation of this data. Our approach is to give a semantic definition of the digital user objects’ attributes to ease the mapping process of an abstract user object to the concrete instantiation of each software system. Therefore we created an ontology to define the mapping of users’ attributes as well as an architecture which enables the semantic integration of identity data repositories. Our solution has been tested in an implementation case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 References

  1. Burton Group: Concepts and Definitions (Glossary), Version 2.0, September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phillip J Windley: Digital Identity, O’Reilly Media; 1st edition, August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Kashyap and A. Sheth: Schematic and semantic semilarities between database objects: A context-based approach. The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 5(4):276–304, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien: Issues in Ontology-based Information Integration, IJCAI Seattle / USA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chris Partridge: The Role of Ontology in Semantic Integration, OOPSLA 2002, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Wache, T. Vögele, U. Visser, H. Stuckenschmidt, G. Schuster, H. Neumann and S. Hübner: Ontology-Based Integration of Information-A Survey of Existing Approaches, Intelligent Systems Group, Center for Computing Technologies, University of Bremen, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng Hian Goh. Representing and Reasoning about Semantic Conflicts in Heterogeneous Information Sources, MIT, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3). URL: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2251.txt

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li Ding, Harry Chen, Lalana Kagal, Tim Finin: DAML Person Ontology, 2002. URL: http://daml.umbc.edu/ontofogies/ittalks/person

    Google Scholar 

  10. UMBC Ebiquity Research Group: Person Ontology. URL: http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/ontology/person.owl

    Google Scholar 

  11. Standord University: Knowledge Systems Laboratory Ontology Editor, June 2006. URL: http://www-ksl-svc.stanford.edu:5915/

    Google Scholar 

  12. Homepage of the HR-XML Consortium. URL: http://www.hr-xml.org/

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C Recommendation, February 2004. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sun: Retro Change Log Plug-In. URL: http://docs.sun.com/source/816-6698-10/replicat.html#l5790

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fabian E. Bustamante, Patrick Widener and Karsten Schwan: A Case for Proactivity in Directory Services, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robert Arlein, Juliana Freire, Narain Gehani, Daniel Lieuwen, and Joann Ordille: Making LDAP Active with the LTAP Gateway, in Proceedings Workshop on Databases in Telecommunication, September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Natalya F. Noy and Deborah L. McGuinness: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stanford Medical Informatics: Protege Ontology Editor, 2005. URL: http://protege.stanford.edu

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sean Bechhofer and Raphael Volz: WonderWeb OWL Ontology Validator, 2003. URL: http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator

    Google Scholar 

  20. Racer DIG Reasoner, July 2006. URL: http://www.racer-systems.com/de/index.phtml, http://dig.sourceforge.net/

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiaoshu Wang, Jonas S. Almeida: DLG2-A Graphical Presentation Language for RDF and OWL, 2005. URL: http://charlestoncore.musc.edu/docs/dlg2.html

    Google Scholar 

  22. Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, John Vlissides: Design Patterns, Addison Wesley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hewlett-Packard Development Company: JENA — A Semantic Web Framework for Java, 2005. URL: http://jena.sourceforge.net

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Emig, C., Langer, K., Biermann, J., Abeck, S. (2007). Semantic Integration of Identity Data Repositories. In: Braun, T., Carle, G., Stiller, B. (eds) Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS). Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69962-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics