Skip to main content

Technological Change, the Labor Market, and Wage Inequality

  • Chapter
The Employment Effects of Technological Change

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 593))

  • 850 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. An introductory survey of search and matching models in Cahuc and Zylberberg (2004), whereas the most detailed one can be found in the book by Pissarides (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Two recent studies by Gautier (2002) and Pierrard and Sneessens (2003) extend this assumption and allow high-skilled workers to apply for low-skilled jobs. As we will show in chapters 5 and 6 below, the assumption of separated labor markets does not stand in the way of the replication of the results of Pierrard and Sneessens (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. As in the literature, the above described decision processes are discussed by solving the respective Bellman equations. A detailed discussion of investment processes under uncertainty by using the Bellman equation can be found, for example, in Dixit and Pindyck (1994), p. 95 f.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The zero-profit conditions follows from the fact that in equilibrium firms exploit all profit opportunities from creating new jobs, which drives the respective rents to zero (cf. Pissarides (2000) p. 11).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Note that this relationship is determined by the assumption that the matching function is linear homogeneous; then the probability a vacant job becomes filled in the next period is given by: \( M_i \left( \cdot \right)/v_i = q_i \left( {\theta _i } \right) = M\left( {\frac{{u_i }} {{v_i }},1} \right) \) . A detailed survey of the matching function can be found, for example, in Petrongolo and Pissarides (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. In general, the analysis outlined in this section could easily be extended to aspects concerning firing costs, employment protection, as, for example, described by Pissarides (2001). The importance of firing costs is, for example, studied by Saint-Paul (1996), chap. 9, or by Kohns (2000). See also chapter 6 for a discussion of labor market policies within a dynamic general equilibrium framework.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See e.g. Heckman, Lochner, and Taber (1998) p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See, Greiner, Rubart, and Semmler (2004) p. 608.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Technological Change, the Labor Market, and Wage Inequality. In: The Employment Effects of Technological Change. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 593. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69956-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics