Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Technological Aspects of Generative Learning Object Development

  • Conference paper
Book cover Informatics Education - Supporting Computational Thinking (ISSEP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5090))

Abstract

Learning Objects (LOs) are digital resources that can be used (and reused) to support the learning process. Generative Learning Objects (GLOs) are generic and reusable LOs from which the specific LO content can be generated on demand. We discuss the technological aspects required for implementing the GLOs: (1) variability modeling using feature diagrams, (2) multi-dimensional separation of the LO design concerns, (3) multiple languages for implementing a LO specification, (4) an external metalanguage for implementing parameterization, generalization and modification of a LO, and (5) heterogeneous metaprogramming techniques for generating LO instances from the generic LO specifications on demand. An example of a GLO for teaching array sorting algorithms in a programming curriculum is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Learning Technology Standards Committee. IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata. IEEE Standard 1484.12.1. IEEE, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wiley, D.A.: Learning Object Design and Sequencing Theory. PhD Thesis, Department of Instructional Psychology and Technology, Brigham Young University (June 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fournier-Viger, P., Mayers, A., Najjar, M., Nkambou, R.: A Cognitive and Logic Based Model for Building Glass-Box Learning Objects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 2, 77–94 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pankratius, V.: Aspect-Oriented Learning Objects. In: Proc. of the 4th IASTED Int. Conf. on Web-Based Education (WBE 2005), Grindelwald, Switzerland, February 21-23 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berlanga, A., Garcia, F.J.: A Proposal to Define Adaptive Learning Designs. In: Proc. of Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for Educational Adaptive Hypermedia (SW-EL 2004) in AH 2004, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, August 23, 2004, pp. 354–358 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mohan, P., Brooks, C.: Engineering a Future for Web-based Learning Objects. In: Cueva Lovelle, J.M., Rodríguez, B.M.G., Gayo, J.E.L., Ruiz, M.d.P.P., Aguilar, L.J. (eds.) ICWE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2722, pp. 120–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiley, D.A.: Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In: Wiley, D.A. (ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fowler, M.: UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leeder, D., Boyle, T., Morales, R., Wharrad, H., Garrud, P.: To boldly GLO - Towards the Next Generation of Learning Objects. In: World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education, Washington, USA, November 2004, pp. 28–33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morales, R., Leeder, D., Boyle, T.: A Case in the Design of Generative Learning Objects (GLO): Applied Statistical Methods GLOs. In: Proc. of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2005), Montreal, Canada, June 27-July 2, 2005, pp. 302–310 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Merrill, M.D.: Instructional Transaction Theory (ITT): Instructional Design Based on Knowledge Objects. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Štuikys, V., Damaševičius, R.: Scripting Language Open PROMOL and its Processor. Informatica 11(1), 71–86 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coplien, J., Hoffman, D., Weiss, D.: Commonality and Variability in Software Engineering. IEEE Software, 37–45 (November/December 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sametinger, J.: Software Engineering with Reusable Components. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheard, T.: Accomplishments and Research Challenges in MetaProgramming. In: Taha, W. (ed.) SAIG 2001. LNCS, vol. 2196, pp. 2–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Štuikys, V., Damaševičius, R., Montvilas, M.: A Metaprogramming-Based model for Generation of the eLearning-Oriented WEB Pages. In: Boyle, T., Oriogun, P., Pakstas, A. (eds.) Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. on Information Technology: Research and Education (ITRE 2004), London, England, June 28-July 1, 2004, pp. 64–68 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Štuikys, V., Damaševičius, R.: Towards Knowledge-Based Generative Learning Objects. Information Technology and Control 36(2), 202–212 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, S.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (November 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenecker, U.W., Czarnecki, K.: Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kang, K.C., Lee, J., Donohoe, P.: Feature-Oriented Product Line Engineering. IEEE Software 19(4), 58–65 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. MacGregor, J.: Requirements Engineering in Industrial Product Lines. In: Proc. of Int. Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Product Lines REPL 2002, Essen, Germany, pp. 5–11 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Czarnecki, K., Kim, C.H.P., Kalleberg, K.T.: Feature models are views on ontologies. In: Proc. of 10th Int. Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2006), Baltimore, Maryland, USA, August 21-24, 2006, pp. 41–51 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Štuikys, V., Damaševičius, R., Brauklytė, I., Limanauskienė, V.: Exploration of Learning Object Ontologies Using Feature Diagrams. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA), Vienna, Austria, June 30-July 4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guizzardi, G.: On Ontology, ontologies, Conceptualizations, Modeling Languages, and (Meta)Models. In: Vasilecas, O., Edler, J., Čaplinskas, A. (eds.) Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Databases and Information Systems IV. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simos, M., Creps, R., Klingler, C., Lavine, L.: Software Technology for Adaptable Reliable Systems (STARS). Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Guidebook, v. 1.0 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ossher, H., Tarr, P.: Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns and The Hyperspace Approach. In: Aksit, M. (ed.) Software Architectures and Component Technology: The State of the Art in Software Development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kleinjohann, B.: Invited Talk: Multilanguage Design. In: Proc. of Int. IFIP WG 10.3/WG 10.5 Workshop on Distributed and Parallel Embedded Systems (DIPES 1998), Paderborn, Germany, pp. 23–38 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Damaševičius, R., Štuikys, V.: Separation of Concerns in Multi-language Specifications. Informatica 13(3), 255–274 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E.: MetaDesign: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development. In: Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) End User Development - Empowering People to Flexibly Employ Advanced Information and Communication Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Software Engineering Department, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentų 50-415, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Robertas Damaševičius & Vytautas Štuikys

Authors
  1. Robertas Damaševičius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vytautas Štuikys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Roland T. Mittermeir Maciej M. Sysło

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Damaševičius, R., Štuikys, V. (2008). On the Technological Aspects of Generative Learning Object Development. In: Mittermeir, R.T., Sysło, M.M. (eds) Informatics Education - Supporting Computational Thinking. ISSEP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5090. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69923-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69924-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation